Preview

Duxiu's Ideals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1950 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Duxiu's Ideals
The tedious workday and the harsh living conditions of a peasant eventually gave way to social unrest and revolution in Russia. Peasants had a harsh life since the beginning, but they never blamed the tsar for their rough living conditions. Approximately 90 percent of Russia were peasants, with the average peasant living to only 35 years old. Many lived in damp and musty homes, which they shared with all types of farm animals. [1] They were part of a larger community where the community and family were more important than the individual, and many of them did not have sufficient education until the 1910s, when the literacy rate rose to 40 percent. [8] At the time, the peasants were not content but tolerable with their current lives. The peasants’ …show more content…
Chen Duxiu, a leading intellectual of the May Fourth movement, wants nothing to do with the traditions and “the desires of dignitaries and influential elders.” He wants to build a constitutional republic, where the power is not held by one party or group, but held by the majority of the people. [1] Compared to Duxiu’s goals for a future China, Liang Shuming’s vision is more neutral towards China. However, he gives India as an example not to follow, not because there is anything against the Indians, but because the British once colonized India. Shuming does not believe that China should not be under rule of any other nation, for it shows weakness and gives strength to the controlling nation. He also sees that China lacks “the conquest of nature on the material side of Western culture...the scientific method on the intellectual side of Western culture… [and the] democracy on the social side of Western culture.” [6] Duxiu’s way of creating a constitutional republic is nearly the opposite of the way Sun Yat-sen planned future China: in Yat-sen’s ideal China, the government takes control first, not the people get their freedom right away. Sun Yat-sen has his “three stages of revolution”: everything is to be destroyed by the revolutionary army in the period of destruction, the transitional period is when the people are taught the …show more content…
In the Meiji Constitution, Articles XI through XVI state that the emperor has full control of the army and navy and is able to declare war whenever felt necessary. The emperor is completely prepared to launch an attack on another nation if necessary since he is in charge of the military aspects of the nation. Article XX states that all the Japanese subjects have to be prepared in case their service is needed in the army and navy. In Article XXXII, all the provisions in the articles of the second chapter apply to the army and navy, but they specifically cannot go against the laws, rules, and discipline of the army and navy. Because the emperor is able to control when and where the army and navy fight, choose the people who fight in the army or navy, pull everyone into paying taxes, and make the people support the decisions of the emperor and encourage the army and navy, the emperor is able to declare war anytime he feels like doing so no matter the cost but without losing any time, since the military is always prepared. [1] This militarism can lead to events like the Nanking Massacre, where many Chinese were killed using brutal methods such as “mass execution, burning, burying alive, beheading, and biting by dogs.” [9] Different

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, there was increasing criticism of the institution of serfdom. The Russian empire had, since the reign of Ivan III, been a largely serf based rural nation. 85% of the populations at this time were peasants and most of those, serfs. A serf was someone who was owned by the Land lord, usually a member of the nobility, the serf would work there land until there death, with very little freedoms and certainly no education.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2: The peasant problem in Russia was when Russia needed people to work in factories so they abolished serfdom and put people to work.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Ap Euro Peasents

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The peasants suffered from numerous economic injustices. In Twelve Articles of the Swabian Peasants, peasant leaders bemoaned that the lords forced them to preform services without compensation (Doc2). From any perspective, many would conclude this practice to be forceful slavery, which strips the peasants from what little freedom they already possessed. Also, in the Articles of Peasants of Memmingen, the peasants indict the nobles of turning them into serfs (Doc 3). Serfdom restricts the peasants’ freedom to travel and settle where they so choose. Also, it exchanges a stable income for free housing and protection, as long as the individual remains on the noble’s property and works for free, which would be the antithesis to a peasants ideal life. Given that peasant leaders wrote both documents 2 and 3, it can be assumed that these articles were created with passion and are biased to bolster the extent of oppression delivered by their leaders (Pov 1 and 2). The peasants had a reason to feel exploited. In fact, they were forced to pay feudal dues, church…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huge changes came to Russia when the tsar Alexander II came to power. His reforms freed the serfs and industrialized the nation’s economy. In the past, Russian serfs were tied to the land and worked on the land for the land owners and received no pay. While they were permitted to have farms of their own, serfs had to work the lord’s land whenever called upon, even during times of harvest when their own crops need harvesting or tending. Due to Alexander II’s reforms, these serfs were freed. Once these serfs were freed, they either went into the city to look for work or out to the country to find land. Many also fled to surrounding societies to escape the Russian hardships of being a serf. Russian labor was also changed through Industrialization, also influenced by Alexander II’s reforms. Factories and railroads expanded and industries like coal, steel, and petroleum boomed. Serfs who were emancipated found easy work in factories that were booming. With new industries creating new jobs and plenty of freed serfs to take them, the Russian labor system greatly changed between 1750 and 1914.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some small change came under war communism in 1918. The town houses of the rich were taken over and the living space divided amongst poor families, which meant that the select few benefited from the Bolshevik rule. This aspect can be seen as an improvement when looking at the living conditions endured under the Tsarist period. Because there had been little workers before Witte’s industrialisation, the population of cities dramatically expanded. This expansion had not been organised or supervised, meaning that the facilities accommodating the influx of workers were inadequate. Between 1881 and 1914, workers were overcrowded in insanitary wooden tenements with poor health services and this continued in World War One. Disruption of supplies meant little fuel and a shortage of food. These living conditions can be seen as a change compared to Tsarist Russia as the urban proletariat had barely developed in this era, so they would have not endured overcrowding. In 1917, this series of bad working conditions were set to continue. Sanitary conditions were appalling and fuel for heating was again short. Less than a third of diet came from state provided rations and food prices rocketed in 1919, this resulted in a large scale desertion of towns in favour of the country side. Under Stalin, there was a large degree of continuity for working conditions. Stalin, however, would disagree: ‘Life has become…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite being emancipated, the serfs were still not completely free citizens, which is one of the ways that the Russian state had not improved. It was made difficult for the peasants to get passports, restricting movement around the country. This was done as an attempt to keep the peasants tied to the land, so that Russia’s main industry, agriculture, wouldn’t suffer. Also, it was to keep the nobility happy, because they thought they would lose their workforce, and it was their support that kept the tsar in power.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This period of time ensured many changes, positive and negative regarding the labor system. It is evident that serfdom congealed from about 1750 onwards, meaning that the peasants were required to provide free labor for a particular number of days a year or a specific amount of money to their lords. The time of labor depended on when it was needed. For example, during harvesting or sowing. The job had to be done, regardless, the peasants own farming responsibilities. Subsequent to the emancipation of serfs in 19th century, they had to buy their own freedom, as they were granted land they also had to pay for working on it. Eventually, such strict limitations caused farmers and peasants to leave their farming business and seek more opportunities in large urban areas. That lead to Russia’s rapid industrialization during the 18th. However, prior to Russia's industrialization workers set up guilds to protect their interests. Such guilds were often set up in areas where workers migrated to work - such as logging camps, and were often communal. Although, as the industrialization finally occurred in 19th century, people traveled to cities seeking more opportunities, causing the population to extremely swell. Such overpopulation ensued in dangerous working conditions, very poor sanitation and exploitation of the workers. Such circumstances were very hard to fight off as Russia didn’t have a very strong reformist movement to address such problematic aspects of the society. Unsuccessful attempts to reform the working class troubles, resulted in growing unrest and discontent among all. Eventually, public announcement of opinions was strictly forbidden and punished by a trip to Siberia, which was later widely expanded by the…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serfdom and peasant conditions constituted burning issues in nineteenth century Russia because? The size of peasantry meant that economic change depended on new flexibility in rural life…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia Change over Time

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1700, serfdom had been what Eastern European society was based on in Russia. Serfs were tied to the land as a limited form of slavery. While forms of democracy was spreading across the globe in the late 1700s, Russia was behind and barely affected by the new ways of nationalism inspired by the French Revolution. However, Alexander II had serfdom abolished in the 1861 because he did not believe a country could compete in the modern world if it was based on slavery. However, although serfdom had ended, the status of the peasants did not as remnants of the class structure remained and the liberated serfs remained at the bottom of the social ladder. By the 1860s, when Russia was industrializing, the role the lower class played in society would shift as the liberated serfs moved to the cities to seek work in the factories. This change exists because of the severe hardships in the rural population due to increased taxes on the land. The…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peasants in Russia

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Assess the view that the condition of the peasantry in Russia was transformed in the period from 1855 to 1964.”…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Semyonova’s bleak account of Russian peasantry stands in stark contrast to the romanticized view so common among upper-class Russians. Peasant villages were places of brutal violence, death, sickness, and hard labor. Yet this is the view we need to see and understand. At the time Semyonova performed her research, Russia was barely twenty years away from the most significant period of change in its history – and a revolution that would change the world. By virtue of their numbers, the peasants (and those who claimed to speak for them) would come to play a major role in the decades of turmoil…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays