Preview

Docking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9135 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Docking
Homology Modeling of Dopamine D2 and D3 Receptors: Molecular Dynamics Refinement and Docking Evaluation
Chiara Bianca Maria Platania, Salvatore Salomone, Gian Marco Leggio, Filippo Drago, Claudio Bucolo*
Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, Catania University, Catania, Italy

Abstract
Dopamine (DA) receptors, a class of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), have been targeted for drug development for the treatment of neurological, psychiatric and ocular disorders. The lack of structural information about GPCRs and their ligand complexes has prompted the development of homology models of these proteins aimed at structure-based drug design. Crystal structure of human dopamine D3 (hD3) receptor has been recently solved. Based on the hD3 receptor crystal structure we generated dopamine D2 and D3 receptor models and refined them with molecular dynamics (MD) protocol. Refined structures, obtained from the MD simulations in membrane environment, were subsequently used in molecular docking studies in order to investigate potential sites of interaction. The structure of hD3 and hD2L receptors was differentiated by means of MD simulations and D3 selective ligands were discriminated, in terms of binding energy, by docking calculation. Robust correlation of computed and experimental Ki was obtained for hD3 and hD2L receptor ligands. In conclusion, the present computational approach seems suitable to build and refine structure models of homologous dopamine receptors that may be of value for structure-based drug discovery of selective dopaminergic ligands.
Citation: Platania CBM, Salomone S, Leggio GM, Drago F, Bucolo C (2012) Homology Modeling of Dopamine D2 and D3 Receptors: Molecular Dynamics Refinement and Docking Evaluation. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044316 Editor: Yang Zhang, University of Michigan, United States of America Received May 25, 2012; Accepted August 1, 2012; Published September



References: 1. Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR (2011) The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacological reviews 63: 182–217. 2. Lindgren N, Usiello A, Goiny M, Haycock J, Erbs E, et al. (2003) Distinct roles of dopamine D2L and D2S receptor isoforms in the regulation of protein phosphorylation at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 4305–4309. 3. Landwehrmeyer B, Mengod G, Palacios JM (1993) Dopamine D3 receptor mRNA and binding sites in human brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 18: 187– 192. 4. Diaz J, Pilon C, Le Foll B, Gros C, Triller A, et al. (2000) Dopamine D3 receptors expressed by all mesencephalic dopamine neurons. J Neurosci 20: 8677–8684. 5. Chen PC, Lao CL, Chen JC (2009) The D(3) dopamine receptor inhibits dopamine release in PC-12/hD3 cells by autoreceptor signaling via PP-2B, CK1, and Cdk-5. J Neurochem 110: 1180–1190. 6. Ballesteros JA, Shi L, Javitch JA (2001) Structural mimicry in G protein-coupled receptors: implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors. Mol Pharmacol 60: 1–19. 7. Neve KA, Seamans JK, Trantham-Davidson H (2004) Dopamine receptor signaling. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 24: 165–205. 8. Sokoloff P, Diaz J, Le Foll B, Guillin O, Leriche L, et al. (2006) The dopamine D3 receptor: a therapeutic target for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 5: 25–43. 9. Potter DE, Ogidigben MJ, Chu TC (1998) Lisuride acts at multiple sites to induce ocular hypotension and mydriasis. Pharmacology 57: 249–260. 10. Ogidigben M, Chu TC, Potter DE (1993) Ocular hypotensive action of a dopaminergic (DA2) agonist, 2,10,11-trihydroxy-N-n-propylnoraporphine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 267: 822–827. 11. Potter DE, Shumate DJ (1987) Cianergoline lowers intraocular pressure in rabbits and monkeys and inhibits contraction of the cat nictitans by suppressing sympathetic neuronal function. Journal of ocular pharmacology 3: 309–321. 12. Mekki QA, Hassan SM, Turner P (1983) Bromocriptine lowers intraocular pressure without affecting blood pressure. Lancet 1: 1250–1251. 13. Geyer O, Robinson D, Lazar M (1987) Hypotensive effect of bromocriptine in glaucomatous eyes. Journal of ocular pharmacology 3: 291–294. 14. Chu E, Chu TC, Potter DE (2000) Mechanisms and sites of ocular action of 7hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin: a dopamine(3) receptor agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293: 710–716. 15. Bucolo C, Leggio GM, Maltese A, Castorina A, D’Agata V, et al. (2011) Dopamine-3 receptor modulates intraocular pressure: implications for glaucoma. Biochem Pharmacol 83: 680–686. 16. Sibley DR, Monsma FJ Jr (1992) Molecular biology of dopamine receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13: 61–69. 17. Levant B (1997) The D3 dopamine receptor: neurobiology and potential clinical relevance. Pharmacol Rev 49: 231–252. 18. Sokoloff P, Giros B, Martres MP, Bouthenet ML, Schwartz JC (1990) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dopamine receptor (D3) as a target for neuroleptics. Nature 347: 146–151. 19. Shi L, Javitch JA (2002) The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 437–467. 20. Malmberg A, Nordvall G, Johansson AM, Mohell N, Hacksell U (1994) Molecular basis for the binding of 2-aminotetralins to human dopamine D2A and D3 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 46: 299–312. 21. Chumpradit S, Kung MP, Kung HF (1993) Synthesis and optical resolution of (R)- and (S)-trans-7-Hydroxy-2-[N-propyl-N-(39-iodo-29-propenyl)amino]tetralin: a new D3 dopamine receptor ligand. J Med Chem 36: 4308–4312. 22. Chumpradit S, Kung MP, Vessotskie J, Foulon C, Mu M, et al. (1994) Iodinated 2-aminotetralins and 3-amino-1-benzopyrans: ligands for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. J Med Chem 37: 4245–4250. 23. Martin PL, Kelly M, Cusack NJ (1993) (-)-2-(N-propyl-N-2-thienylethylamino)5-hydroxytetralin (N-0923), a selective D2 dopamine receptor agonist demonstrates the presence of D2 dopamine receptors in the mouse vas deferens but not in the rat vas deferens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: 1342–1348. 24. Reynolds NA, Wellington K, Easthope SE (2005) Rotigotine: in Parkinson’s disease. CNS drugs 19: 973–981. 25. Glase SA, Corbin AE, Pugsley TA, Heffner TG, Wise LD (1995) Synthesis and dopaminergic activity of pyridine analogs of 5-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin. J Med Chem 38: 3132–3137. 26. Mierau J, Schneider FJ, Ensinger HA, Chio CL, Lajiness ME, et al. (1995) Pramipexole binding and activation of cloned and expressed dopamine D2, D3 and D4 receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 290: 29–36. 27. Bettinetti L, Schlotter K, Hubner H, Gmeiner P (2002) Interactive SAR studies: rational discovery of super-potent and highly selective dopamine D3 receptor antagonists and partial agonists. J Med Chem 45: 4594–4597. 28. Lopez L, Selent J, Ortega R, Masaguer CF, Dominguez E, et al. (2010) Synthesis, 3D-QSAR, and structural modeling of benzolactam derivatives with binding affinity for the D(2) and D(3) receptors. ChemMedChem 5: 1300–1317. 29. Ortega R, Hubner H, Gmeiner P, Masaguer CF (2011) Aromatic ring functionalization of benzolactam derivatives: new potent dopamine D3 receptor ligands. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 21: 2670–2674. 30. Tschammer N, Elsner J, Goetz A, Ehrlich K, Schuster S, et al. (2011) Highly potent 5-aminotetrahydropyrazolopyridines: enantioselective dopamine D3 receptor binding, functional selectivity, and analysis of receptor-ligand interactions. J Med Chem 54: 2477–2491. 31. Chien EY, Liu W, Zhao Q, Katritch V, Han GW, et al. (2010) Structure of the human dopamine D3 receptor in complex with a D2/D3 selective antagonist. Science 330: 1091–1095. 32. Carlsson J, Coleman RG, Setola V, Irwin JJ, Fan H, et al. (2011) Ligand discovery from a dopamine D3 receptor homology model and crystal structure. Nat Chem Biol 7: 769–778. 33. Obiol-Pardo C, Lopez L, Pastor M, Selent J (2011) Progress in the structural prediction of G protein-coupled receptors: D3 receptor in complex with eticlopride. Proteins 79: 1695–1703. 34. Kortagere S, Cheng SY, Antonio T, Zhen J, Reith ME, et al. (2011) Interaction of novel hybrid compounds with the D3 dopamine receptor: Site-directed mutagenesis and homology modeling studies. Biochemical pharmacology 81: 157–163. 35. Wang Q, Mach RH, Luedtke RR, Reichert DE (2010) Subtype selectivity of dopamine receptor ligands: insights from structure and ligand-based methods. Journal of chemical information and modeling 50: 1970–1985. 36. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195–201. 37. Kiefer F, Arnold K, Kunzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T (2009) The SWISSMODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D387–392. 38. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33–38, 27–38. 39. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781–1802. 40. Darden T YD, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: An N [center-dot] log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98: 10089–10092. 41. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31: 455–461. 42. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Huey R, Olson AJ (1996) Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4. J Comput Aided Mol Des 10: 293–304. 43. Huey R, Morris GM, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS (2007) A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J Comput Chem 28: 1145–1152. 44. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, et al. (2012) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D13–25. 45. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) ZINC–a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45: 177–182. 46. Schuttelkopf AW, van Aalten DM (2004) PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60: 1355–1363. 47. O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, et al. (2011) Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform 3: 33. 48. Ballesteros JA, Jensen AD, Liapakis G, Rasmussen SG, Shi L, et al. (2001) Activation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor involves disruption of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane segments 3 and 6. The Journal of biological chemistry 276: 29171–29177. 49. Okada T, Sugihara M, Bondar AN, Elstner M, Entel P, et al. (2004) The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 A crystal structure. Journal of molecular biology 342: 571–583. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 11 September 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 9 | e44316 D2 and D3 Receptors Modeling 50. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, et al. (2000) Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289: 739– 745. 51. Vogel R, Mahalingam M, Ludeke S, Huber T, Siebert F, et al. (2008) Functional role of the ‘‘ionic lock’’–an interhelical hydrogen-bond network in family A heptahelical receptors. Journal of molecular biology 380: 648–655. 52. Le Guilloux V, Schmidtke P, Tuffery P (2009) Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC bioinformatics 10: 168. 53. Yap BK, Buckle MJ, Doughty SW (2012) Homology modeling of the human 5HT(1A), 5-HT (2A), D1, and D2 receptors: model refinement with molecular dynamics simulations and docking evaluation. Journal of molecular modeling. 54. Lape M, Elam C, Paula S (2010) Comparison of current docking tools for the simulation of inhibitor binding by the transmembrane domain of the sarco/ endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase. Biophys Chem 150: 88–97. 55. Yap BK, Buckle MJ, Doughty SW (2012) Homology modeling of the human 5HT(1A), 5-HT (2A), D1, and D2 receptors: model refinement with molecular dynamics simulations and docking evaluation. J Mol Model. 56. Kuzhikandathil EV, Kortagere S (2012) Identification and Characterization of a Novel Class of Atypical Dopamine Receptor Agonists. Pharmaceutical research. 57. Ghosh B, Antonio T, Zhen J, Kharkar P, Reith ME, et al. (2010) Development of (S)-N6-(2-(4-(isoquinolin-1-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl)-N6-propyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro benzo[d]-thiazole-2,6-diamine and its analogue as a D3 receptor preferring agonist: potent in vivo activity in Parkinson’s disease animal models. J Med Chem 53: 1023–1037. 58. Zhang J, Zhang Y (2010) GPCRRD: G protein-coupled receptor spatial restraint database for 3D structure modeling and function annotation. Bioinformatics 26: 3004–3005. 59. Zhang J, Liang Y, Zhang Y (2011) Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling. Structure 19: 1784–1795. 60. Wang Q, Mach RH, Luedtke RR, Reichert DE (2010) Subtype selectivity of dopamine receptor ligands: insights from structure and ligand-based methods. J Chem Inf Model 50: 1970–1985. 61. Millan MJ, Newman-Tancredi A, Audinot V, Cussac D, Lejeune F, et al. (2000) Agonist and antagonist actions of yohimbine as compared to fluparoxan at alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors (AR)s, serotonin (5-HT)(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(1D) and dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors. Significance for the modulation of frontocortical monoaminergic transmission and depressive states. Synapse 35: 79–95. 62. Millan MJ, Maiofiss L, Cussac D, Audinot V, Boutin JA, et al. (2002) Differential actions of antiparkinson agents at multiple classes of monoaminergic receptor. I. A multivariate analysis of the binding profiles of 14 drugs at 21 native and cloned human receptor subtypes. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 303: 791–804. 63. Scheller D, Ullmer C, Berkels R, Gwarek M, Lubbert H (2009) The in vitro receptor profile of rotigotine: a new agent for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s archives of pharmacology 379: 73–86. 64. Sokoloff P, Andrieux M, Besancon R, Pilon C, Martres MP, et al. (1992) Pharmacology of human dopamine D3 receptor expressed in a mammalian cell line: comparison with D2 receptor. European journal of pharmacology 225: 331–337. 65. Tadori Y, Forbes RA, McQuade RD, Kikuchi T (2011) Functional potencies of dopamine agonists and antagonists at human dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors. European journal of pharmacology 666: 43–52. 66. Scheideler MA, Martin J, Hohlweg R, Rasmussen JS, Naerum L, et al. (1997) The preferential dopamine D3 receptor agonist cis-8-OH-PBZI induces limbic Fos expression in rat brain. European journal of pharmacology 339: 261–270. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 12 September 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 9 | e44316

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Max Response * [D]/(Kd +[D]) Shapes of dose-response curves Significance of Kd ligand dissociation constant half-max binding when [D] = Kd Understand the difference between Potency and Efficacy Know the general mechanism of drug-receptor interaction, and recognize dose-response curves for: Agonists Antagonists Competitive Non-competitive Partial Agonists Inverse Agonists Biochemical Classification of Receptors: Know the general characteristics and mechanism of action for: Membrane-bound receptors G protein-coupled Ligand-regulated ion channels Tyrosine Kinase-linked Guanyl cyclase-linked (Know some specific examples of each type) Cytosolic/nuclear “soluble” receptors…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PCP is a NMDA receptor antagonist with a pretty complex mechanism of action but studies shows that it blocks the receptors proceedings, by inhibiting the uptake of dopamine, 5-HT,and norepinephrine.[1,3,4] By this…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ely Mine

    • 1764 Words
    • 14 Pages

    References: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. (2002). The biotic ligand model: a historical overview. Retrieved from http://elsevier.com/locate/cbpc…

    • 1764 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Szectitiman. H et al (1999) role of dopamine systems in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) – implications from a novel psych stimulant – induced animal model. Polish journal of pharmacology, 51,…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pharmacology

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain: the structure of GABAA receptor complex and location of Benzodiazepine’s and barbiturate’s binding sites on GABAA receptors.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pharmacology Review Sheet

    • 11954 Words
    • 48 Pages

    Nicotine induces P-450 enzymes in the liver. An AIDS patient taking a protease inhibitor drug which is metabolized by these enzymes would experience which of the following if they smoked…

    • 11954 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 3. CNSforum (2002) Distribution of dopamine D1–D5 receptors in normal brain http://www.cnsforum.com/imagebank/item/hrl_rcpt_sys_DA_dist/default.aspx Retrieved: 15th Feb 2011…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Effects of Nicotine on Brain

    • 4120 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Livingstone P.D. et al. 2009. α7 and non-α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors modulate dopamine release in vitro and in vivo in the rat prefrontal cortex. EJN. 29:539-550.…

    • 4120 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that transports signals between nerve endings in the brain. It is thought that the brains of people with schizophrenia produce too much dopamine. Antipsychotic medications, which are used to treat schizophrenia, block dopamine receptors. The medications are designed to bind to dopamine receptors in the brain, and their effects have helped many people cope with symptoms; while drugs that increase levels of dopamine, like amphetamines, often cause psychotic symptoms and a schizophrenic-like paranoid…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Addiction Paradox

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kalivas, P. W., and N. D. Volkow. "New Medications For Drug Addiction Hiding In Glutamatergic Neuroplasticity." Molecular Psychiatry 16.10 (2011): 974-986. EBSCO MegaFILE. Web. 7 Apr. 2014.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * A1 version appears to reduce dopamine receptors leading to high risk of alcohol abuse to compensate for lack of dopamine (+)…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biology with an interest neuroscience is my field of study. Which focuses my general research on the effect of neurotransmitters in the brain. Since there is so much information found about the following, the narrowed down idea of this research is the effect of dopamine has on the brain.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Computer models are available that display human molecular structures which can predict the toxicity of the…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Formaldehyde Case Study

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Understanding protein-protein interactions is becoming a vital study for application in the development of new age pharmaceuticals and utilization in diagnostic models. The overall aim is to gain an insight into the function and role of individual proteins with specific interest on how they react in cells, (Toews et al. 2008). The biopharma industry in Ireland is becoming a booming success for the economy therefore a complete understanding of how proteins interact in vivo is essential to the development of newer and better technologies. Chemical cross-linking of proteins has been a long established technique with the ultimate goal of covalently linking amino acid side chains of a particular protein and inducing an increased stability on the overall structure of the targeted amino acid or protein side chain,(Means & Feeney 1990).…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Molecular Modelling

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Molecular modellers, or computational chemists, are those scientists who are specially trained in the technologies, techniques, and tools of molecular modelling. This field is quickly becoming a new sub-specialty of chemistry, gaining importance alongside sub-disciplines such as organic, inorganic, analytical, physical, and industrial chemistry. Computational chemistry is becoming increasingly recognized as a discipline in its own right. Universities are beginning to offer concentrations and/or majors in computational chemistry.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays