Preview

discuss two errors in attribution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
discuss two errors in attribution
Discuss two errors in attributions.
Attribution, defined as assigning a quality or character to a person or an object, in the context of Psychology, refers to the classification of factors that affect behaviour. Behaviour is attributed to either or both dispositional factors and situational factors. Dispositional factors refer to the internal causes of an individual’s behaviour, whilst situational factors deal with the external causes of behaviour which can include the social setting and environment. Two common errors of attribution are the Fundamental attribution error (FAE) and Self-serving bias (SSB).
Fundamental attribution error is a term used to refer to a bias to attribute other people’s behaviour to internal causes rather than external circumstances. If people behave kindly towards us with a warm gesture we immediately assume and conclude that they have a kind personality whilst if they behave in ways that seem impolite to us (perhaps not greet us at all) we tend to think of them as rude. Instead of acknowledging the important role played by situational determinants of behaviour, we assume that other people’s behaviour reflects their dispositions.
A study that demonstrates the (FAE) is Jones and Harris (1967). These researchers asked their participants to read essays written by fellow students which were about Fidel Castro’s rule in Cuba and were either supportive or critical of Castro. There were two conditions- the choice condition and the no choice condition. The choice condition was that a group of the participants were told the essayists were given the choice whether to take a positive or negative view of Castro whilst in the no choice condition, another group of the participants were told that the essayist did not have any choice and that the experimenter had assigned them in the pro-Castro or anti-Castro role. As expected, participants in the choice condition assumed that the essays reflected the genuine attitudes of their writers. However,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biases assigned to a person without intention, awareness, effort, or control, often based on subliminal cues…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Attribution theory assumes that people try to determine why people do what they do. When we (the observer) try to understand why another person (the actor) did something, we can either attribute one or more causes to that behaviour, internal/dispositional -the inference that a person is behaving in a certain way because of something about the person, such as attitude, character or personality. Or; external/situational - the inference that a person is…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Normally people attribute positive occurrences to some internal factors or as a result of their actions while negative things are associated with external factors. According to Wood, people are somehow blind in perception of negative things that affect their lives. I have successfully, determined the existence of self-serving bias through a friends behavior and my own actions. In both cases, it is intrinsically hard to associate a negative occurrence with one’s own capacity. I normally find it easy to consider my poor performance in an examination to other factors rather than my own failure to prepare effectively for the exam. On closer look, I realize that…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error focuses generally on how people explain how and why things happen in a social setting. There is a strong tendency for people to explain their own behavior as a function of external situations, but attribute the behavior of others to internal factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Serving Bias

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias are similar in that they both are errors made using perception. Fundamental attribution error deals with wrongly explaining a behavior based on some factors that are internal. It can also be explained as over exaggerating a reason behind a person’s behavior or actions. For example, saying the reason that a person isn’t tying his or her shoe lace is because he or she is lazy. This is wrongly labelling a person with a particular characteristic trait based on limited information.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biases, and more specifically, perceptual biases are a range of humanly inevitable techniques that are used by people to make sense of the behaviours, personalities, and attitudes of other people around them. These various techniques are generally the easy way out when we try to analyze an individual's predisposition. However, because they are the easy way out, they cause us to receive only a limited and possibly inaccurate impression of the individual in question and consequently, formulate a biased perception of the individual in our minds. These biased judgements may lead to great difficulties for individual decision makers as well as the organizations they work for. Some of these erroneous techniques that are used to judge an individual's behaviour and personality include the primacy effect, where more weight is given to the early cues when forming an impression; the recency effect, which is the tendency to rely on recent cues when forming an impression; the halo effect, where an impression about an individual's characteristics are based on a single characteristic; and stereotyping, which is the tendency to make generalizations about an individual on the…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the biases commonly seen in attribution, including the fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer effect. List the factors that may account for these biases.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While figuring out what causes people to behave in the way that they do, we cannot forget the biases that may come along with it. We tend to make snap judgements of people, as the book says we have a “gut feeling.” However, going by these “gut feelings” we tend to choose one attribution over the other and they usually are not very nice attributions. For example, in class when asked to list reasons a person may be rude to you on the road, most of the reasons we came up with were that the person was an asshole or they were annoyed or what not. We tend to blame the person and not the situation. This is part of the Fundamental attribution error. While when talking about other people we often call them annoying or impatient. However, when…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    14. Fundamental attribution error: a bias toward overattributing the behavior of others to internal causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cognitive Dissonance Paper

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attribution theory attempts to explain how we attach meaning to either our behavior or other people’s behavior. As explained by Malle (2011), the attribution theory examines how the social observer uses certain tiding to arrive at contributory clarifications for certain events. Attribution theory, therefore, is keen on examining how information is gathered and shared to shape a causal ruling. The first proponent of this theory, Heider believed that individuals are naïve psychologists who try to make sense out of the world around them. This theory was later taken up by various…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, researchers are more focused on “how people develop their own ideas about other people, that is attribution theory, and the ways these ideas are organized, that is called personal construct theory (Hartley113). The attribution theory, is set to explain how we perceive each other. Once we are able to master the attribution theory, we are able to understand why we perceive each other the way we do; this allows us to analyze what we will say and how we will say something in the future ahead of us, such as in perception checking. Attribution theory determines “how people decide the cause of other people’s actions and vice versa” (Hartley 116). When faced with hard times, it is important that we come to understand that “our perception of other people is inextricably bound up with our perception of the situation that we believe they are in” (Hartley…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays