Preview

Cognitive Psych Study Guide

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cognitive Psych Study Guide
Review Questions
Introduction to Psychology

Social Psychology;

Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?

Personal attributions- also know as internal or dispositional attributions, are explanations that refer to things within people, such as abilities, traits, moods, or efforts.

Situational attributions- external attributions, refer to outside events, such as the weather, accidents, or people’s actions

Fundamental attribution error- we tend to overemphasize the importance of personality traits and underestimate the importance or enviromental reasons of situation. Ex. Women fighting to board train

Explain and give examples of causes of interpersonal attraction, including proximity, familiarity, similarity, reciprocity, arousal, reactance, and physical attractiveness.

Interpersonal attraction-feeling drawn to another person

Proximity-we tend to like people that are close to us

Familiarity- we like mirrored images, and the more we are familiar with a person the more we like them

Similarity- birds of feather flock together, more similar person’s attitudes are to our own, the more we like the person. We need social validation of our beliefs and characteristics.

Reciprocity- we like those who like us

Arousal- when we are aroused, we are more likely to be attracted to someone Ex. Dutton and Aron bridge experiment or Horror Movies if your date doesn’t like horror movies and you take her to one then she is less likely to like you

Reactance- Romeo and Juliet effect. If someone like your parents tells you that they don’t like or don’t want you to be around your girlfriend, the more you will love them because we don’t like limits put on our freedom.

Physical Attractiveness- we like to find people that have similar physical attractiveness to us. Beautiful people are seen to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several studies in the 1960s presented the zeitgeist of social psychology research into attraction. Walster et al. (1966) did a study testing the matching hypothesis (where you’re most likely attracted to someone who is on a similar level of attractiveness to one’s self) where he advertised a ‘computer dance’ for students during fresher’s week at college. The first 376 males and 376 female volunteers were allowed in at £1.00 each. When the students arrived to sign up for the dance, four independent judges assessed each student’s…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Greeks used a formula that is often found in nature called the Golden Ratio, to…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Instead of taking into account various factors similarity as done by Leonard, our study will focus strictly on comparing the levels of attractiveness among mates. According to the matching hypothesis in social psychology men and women of a similar level of attractiveness will be drawn to each other as…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Define the concept of attribution. What is the difference between an internal and an external attribution?…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Griffitt and Guay (1969), participants were evaluated on a creative task by an experimenter and then asked to rate how much they liked the experimenter. The rating was highest when the experimenter had positively evaluated the participant’s performance on the task. This study supports the claim that we like people who are associated with pleasant events. This provides strong support that similarity is important in attraction, but also highlights reciprocal liking also is factor in the formation of relationships; however this may not be the only factor influencing this. The experiment was only of an imaginary…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    14. Fundamental attribution error: a bias toward overattributing the behavior of others to internal causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pet Peeve Speech

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages

    as well. We tend to look at someone and think that their looks tie in with their personality…

    • 712 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cognitive Dissonance Paper

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attribution theory attempts to explain how we attach meaning to either our behavior or other people’s behavior. As explained by Malle (2011), the attribution theory examines how the social observer uses certain tiding to arrive at contributory clarifications for certain events. Attribution theory, therefore, is keen on examining how information is gathered and shared to shape a causal ruling. The first proponent of this theory, Heider believed that individuals are naïve psychologists who try to make sense out of the world around them. This theory was later taken up by various…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What I believe attract us to one another is the physical appearance, what we see when we first meet a person, although there’s often more to that. The reason I say this is some people can meet someone who they physically like, but can be easily turned off by their personality or it can be the opposite where the person overlooks how less attractive the other person may be but their personality is what may have captured them. All other things being equal, we prefer highly attractive individuals as dates, as friends, and to interact with in a general situation. This so happens to be true in today’s society, women my age tend to want to hang around attractive or pretty girls oppose to someone who is less attractive. It makes them and their whole circle of friends look good. While individuals might desire a relationship with an attractive person, they might not desire a relationship with the not so attractive individual. For example, most people tend to date those who they feel they are more attractive too or have the same type of similarities and personalities from those who are less attractive but may not have the same similarities. I often wonder does it matter if the person you’re attractive to don’t share the same qualities. Even though opposites can attract whether their attractive or not?!…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are six factors that describe attraction. The mere exposure happens when we are around someone or something so much, we grow fond of it. For example, you go to training classes for your new positions for the next 4 weeks. When you are hired you are more likely to hang around the people who sat closest to you during your weeks of training. We are more attracted to individuals who are attractive. In a study that evaluated attraction bias and the effect it had on hiring managers, 112 managers were given four potential candidates resume and pictures to go over. The managers chose candidates who were more attractive (Marlowe, Schneider,& Nelson, 1996). We are attracted to individuals that we can relate to. For example, advocates for PETA and a person who works on a slaughter farm are less likely to be associated with each other. Along with being attracted to those we relate to, we are also attracted to individuals we look like. For example, in a room full of Hispanics and Blacks, Hispanics are more likely to mingle with Hispanics; the same with black individuals. We are less likely to befriend someone of another culture because of the factor, we are more attracted to individuals we look like. Feenstra also suggest we like individuals who are had to get because “they are selective in their social choices” (Feenstra, 2011, Ch. 13.1, “We like Those Who Are Hard to Get”). If we can form a bond with this individual, it can…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fundamental attribution error plays a role in this because, the error is made by people in which they attribute someone else 's behavior more to their personality and characteristic then to the situation in which they have been placed. In reality, someone 's behavior is actually more likely to be caused by the environment and situation that they have been placed in as opposed to their…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attractiveness: we tend to develop relationships with people who are approximately as attractive as we are (tendency is called the matching hypothesis)…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays