Preview

Dbq Revolution, Confederation, Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
527 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Revolution, Confederation, Constitution
Unit 2: Revolution, Confederation, Constitution
DBQ 3: Causes of the Revolutionary War
Document 1: Why did Whately ( and probably most other English officials) fell that the American colonists should be willing to pay higher taxes to Parliament?
Because the American colonists have received a lot of Advantages from Britain. They were receiving food, money, cloth, weapons and almost everything, from Britain.
Document 2: According to Dickinson, what taxes was Parliament justified in imposing on the colonies?
The Parliament was levying taxes from the American by lying that they will regulate the trade, but they never did, and the tax money was going to Britain’s pocket.
Why did he object to the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts?
The Stamp Act met great resistance in the colonies. The colonies sent no representatives to Parliament, and therefore had no influence over what taxes were raised, how they were levied, or how they would be spent. The Townshend Acts were also meeting with resistance in the colonies, they didn’t know what was going on whatsoever.
Document 3: How does the engraving tell a different story from the above description of the Boston Massacre?
From this excerpt, we can see how Britain didn’t mean to make a “massacre”. A crowd of Boston boys and men surrounded a number of British soldiers and began taunting and cursing them while pelting them with snowballs. This was the reason of the Boston “massacre”.
Where do you suppose the term “massacre” to describe this event came from?
I think that the reason of using the term “massacre” is to show that a lot of people died and were wounded. It can also be described to the American colonies as a “massacre” because it could be the reason of their revolution against Britain.
Document 4: Who did Cresswell blame for the growing antagonism between the British and the American colonists?
He mainly blamed the committee which were appointed to inspect into the character and conduct of every tradesman, to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the French and Indian war Britain had a lot. To help repay this debt they started taxing the colonists. In 1765 Britain passed the stamp act. The stamp act taxed many written and paper documents. The stamp act taxed so many documents that the colonists were paying a lot more money for things they buy everyday, like newspapers. If they wanted to buy some land they also had to pay a tax. The british did not let the colonist have a say with this act. The stamp act was against the law. The king was betraying his country. Document 1.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Why did the colonists object to taxation by the British Parliament? Who did they believe had the right to tax them in their colonies?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston massacre was the first battle of the american revolution. Paul Revere wanted to get more people to be on their side so that they could go to war with Britain to gain their freedom. So that they didn’t have to by the tea that went along with the tea act passed by parliament.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    e. To set new tax rates in the colonies in response to a request from Parliament…

    • 1761 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Third, the payment of high taxes by the British government was due to more than reasons. Two reasons are that they wanted to show the colonists that they were in control and because of their money problems. Due to their big debt after the war Britain thought the colonists should help pay of some of their debt. The colonist might have agreed but they were upset that the King and Parliament had taxed them without their consent. They wanted to vote about their own taxes like the people in Britian. However, the colonies were not allowed to send representatives to parliament to speak for them.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hum Quiz

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages

    11. Why did the British feel entitled to tax the colonists following the Seven Years' War?…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, a group of brave colonists gathered around a British Soldier at a local tax office. They hurled insults at the soldier, and with the confusion that ranged gunshots were heard; Five men were found wounded on the ground. Although the Boston Massacre seemed to be the colonists' fault since they started off by hurling insults, we must remember how the British Soldiers treated the colonists before. For example, the Quartering Act forced families to have open their homes to British Soldiers in order to shelter and feed them. Nevertheless, the news about the Boston Massacre spread quickly throughout the colonies.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and in return for all they did for them in the French and Indian War. According to Document 1, Thomas Whately, an advisor to the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Grenville, believed that the Americans should contribute to the government in preserving and maintaining all the advantages they’ve received. They thought the colonists should be willing to pay higher taxes without a doubt but in the eyes of the American colonists, the new taxes that the British created were viewed to be for the purpose of increasing the revenue. In Document 2 Dickinson writes, “Never did the British Parliament, [until the passage of the Stamp Act] think of imposing duties in America for the purpose of raising a revenue.” In addition, the fact that Britain didn’t even bother to ask about their opinions before putting these new taxes, made the colonists feel as if they were threatened with no rights. This is when the American colonists decide to justify in waging war and break away from…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was a crucial event that occurred on March 5th, 1770. At this point in history, tension was high between the British forces and angry colonists. People of the 13 colonies began to become outraged at Britain for passing unfair laws, such as taxes on goods like tea and paper. A group of men whom had lost their jobs and blamed the British gathered around the Customs House in a riot. Eight British soldiers stood their ground in front of the protesters, both sides becoming more and more outraged at each other. The event quickly escalated after young Edward Garrick is hit with the back of a soldier’s firearm. Private Hugh Montgomery is hit with a club and is the first to fire at the colonists, despite Captain Thomas Preston’s command not to shoot. More men are killed as people began to back away from the scene. The Boston Massacre ends with 5 patriots dead and 6 wounded. As the Independence Hall Association says, “The Boston Massacre was a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War.” The colonists were fed up with Britain and acted on their anger without thinking about what could’ve and did happen. The soldiers ignored their orders not to shoot and turned a riot into a massacre that led to the Revolutionary War. Had both sides controlled their rage and not acted without considering the consequences, the death of 5 people would have been…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patrick Henry Dbq

    • 2948 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Townshend customs commissioners there had been at risk as targets of public anger, but this anger now transferred itself onto the at times high-handed Redcoats, who were seen as the military arm of British encroachment. On March 5th, 1770, the Boston Massacre, the culmination of a series of clashes, saw eight British soldiers, pelted with ice and stones, open fire and kill five Bostonians. Though Parliament was subsequently quiet for 3 years, the mood in the American towns had changed to one of tension and imminent confrontation, and this soon spread to the countryside.…

    • 2948 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “What is this but taxing us at a certain sum and leaving us only the manner of raising it?” Dickinson puts up a major argument questioning the British manner of taxing the colonists on things that there shouldn’t be taxes on and then having the audacity to raise them just leaving the colonist in the same state of being when there was no tax at all. He expresses his thoughts on the stamp act and how raising the tax on printed goods would serve as any value to the colonist which goes along with his main argument of not seeing any true purpose to the raised prices. Dickinson’s dislike of the British’s conduct toward the Americans is well noted as he clarifies all the wrongs the British are doing to prevent freedom and in efforts to raise money for themselves by plainly taking it from the Englishman in…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonists despised the unlimited power of the parliament and their authority to levy taxes to raise revenue. The colonist had to fight against the tyranny. The parliament passed many unjustified laws that were unconstitutional and destructive to the liberty to the colonies. The parliament believed they had the authority to make laws to regulate the trade of all the colonies. The British made it known that the parliament had “the right to make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever” as stated in Document 5. The colonists felt it was unfair for the British to have unlimited power over them. {Document 2 & Document 5}…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason it was called a MASSACRE was for all the colonist to rise up against the British.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most fundamental reason for the American Revolution was the colonist’s outrage over taxation which led to a tax revolt launched by people who were tired of the burden of paying unfair taxes. The king placed taxes known as Townsend Acts, on the colonist’s tea, paper, paint, lead, glass, and many other items that were used daily and the colonists were against this taxing. The purpose of the Townsend Acts was to help pay the cost of government in America. Lawyer James Otis and other colonist rebels referred to King George as a tyrant. As stated by James Otis in The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved (1763), . . . “The very act of taxing exercised over those who are not represented appears to me to be depriving them of one of their most essential rights as freemen, and if continued seems to be in effect and entire…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays