Preview

Dax Cowart: A Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
247 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dax Cowart: A Case Study
I do think people have the right to refuse treatment if and only if that person has the "capacity to deliberate a plan of action" and has the "capacity to put the plan into action" (Shannon & Kockler 47). Denying a competent person the ability to decide for his or herself would being denying their autonomy. I think the idea of providing appropriate treatment to a person in need describes our understanding of beneficence because we as humans want to help other humans. We feel an obligation to help others, and that shows by our want to provide treatment.

I don't think I could justify treating someone against their will because it violates their autonomy. An example of a person denying medical treatment is the case of Dax Cowart. Dax was severely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first legal issue in this case is patient consent. To perform any medical intervention or move ahead with a given treatment doctors need the authorization of the patient or his legal guardian. If doctors perform the treatment without this consent they could be charged for battery or negligence. In this case, Mr. Jones verbalized he do not want any intervention and that he wants his body intact then doctors cannot undertake the proposed treatment. However, Mr. Jones daughter disagrees.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The removal of Terri Schiavo’s PEG tube went against the non-malfeasance principle. The ethical principle of non-malfeasance is the avoidance of harm on a patient (ANA, n.d.). “Judges who would not halt the removal of Schiavo’s PEG tube were ‘guilty not only of judicial malfeasance — but of the cold-blooded, cold-hearted extermination of an innocent human life’” (Bishop, 2008). The same could be said about the healthcare provider that removed the PEG tube. Physicians and nurses take oaths and pledges that state they will do no harm to patients in their care. When the PEG tube was removed it took away her means of hydration. The symptoms of extreme dehydration are extremely painful. The other side of the ethical dilemma could be that the family wanted to end her suffering. Although by doing so wouldn’t that open the doors to ending people’s lives in the future that are cognitively disabled being euthanized in the same…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with your statement that we can cause harm as a result of not acknowledging autonomy. I think that assisting patients to a position of maximum autonomy involves providing them with unbiased information about their health status and pros/cons of their treatment regimen. According to Canther (2001), providing value-free information includes staff being ready to engage in debates that include awareness of the interpretation which their own values and beliefs unavoidably impose on the evidence (Canter, 2001). Furthermore, Brinchmann (2002), explains that nurses must be ready to work collaboratively with patients and within the multidisciplinary team to enable patients to express their own point of view, commensurate with their desired…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Dax's Case

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page

    I think that the respect of patient's autonomy in today's policy and values is sufficient enough. In Dax's case, there were less respect of patient's autonomy relative to today's world where people say "do what you do" is more common and more respected. I think that there will always be a clash between family members, doctors, and the patients themselves. I, a person who has an Asian background, probably had the typical problem with dying family, specifically my grandfather. My grandfather was in hospital for months and the hospital bill just keeps mounting. So, my grandfather decided to go home and just take the necessary medications until he died soon after he got out of the hospital. But, my grandmother and mother did not want him to go…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsm 542 week 2 you decide

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The morals involved here is the patient’s right to refuse care if she chooses and also the right to die. The moral principles of ethics involved also in this case are: Beneficence- act of doing good, demonstrating kindness, showing compassion, and helping others; Non-maleficence- avoiding the infliction of harm; Justice- the duty to be fair in the distribution of risks and benefits, and; Autonomy- recognizing an individual’s right to make his or her own decisions.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doe V. Delie Case Study

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, there are instances where the governmental interests that might outweigh the incarcerated individual’s right to refuse medical treatment: preservation of life;…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An analysis of Robert Schwartz “Autonomy, Futility, and the Limits of Medicine” reveals that physicians are not required to give patients treatment that has been proven to be effective, and they are not morally obligated to provide treatment that is not in-line with practice of medicine. Schwartz explains although our autonomy is respected, there are limitations on our request.…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. Does the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment? Why or why not? Yes the patient in this case have a right to refuse treatment because he has the choice to make the decision himself and on top of that he does not believe in modern day cancer treatments.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recent cases have drawn attention to the issue of individual autonomy, and what is sometimes referred to as ‘the right to die’. Adult patients who are mentally competent have the right to refuse medical treatment even when that refusal can lead to worsening ill health and even death. This refusal of treatment may only be ignored when statutory law provides for treatment without consent, or a judge makes an order that overrides the patient’s consent. While this is largely accepted when patients are physically and mentally competent, it becomes a complex issue when a person is mentally competent, but due to physical incapacity are in care because they are unable to care for themselves. A person may be mentally competent but due to being a quadriplegic…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hscd Level 2 Unit 204

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dilemmas may arise between duty of care and an individual’s rights if a service user refuses medication or personal care. An individual may want to do something that is dangerous or risky. They have the right to have the choice to do this and I must respect their rights but I also have a duty to keep them safe.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As adults and human beings we have certain inalienable rights to make decisions regardless of whether they are deemed as poor or inappropriate by others. One must take into consideration the level of understanding and competence a patient possesses to assure they are informed of all options and repercussions; the other must be whether the individual is harming anyone other than themselves by making said decision. Once those issues have been taken into consideration there must be an allowance for an individual to make their own well-informed choice, even though as a practitioner, we may feel it is not in their best interest.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arising conflicts should be resolved as quickly as possible in a most satisfactory matter for both sides. The Human Rights Acts states that every person has the right to decide about own life, they can refuse the treatments and medication they recieve. It is essential to explain why they need that particular care and make them aware of pros and cons.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each patient has the right to know what services they are seeking and to make their decisions based on their situation. In some cases, the Social Worker or Counselor must decide what’s best for the client, if they are not capable of making decisions on own. For an example, they may show signs of psychological trauma. A patient’ rights should always be considered first. These practices should never be determined by someone else neither values nor opinions.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Autonomy is demonstrated in the ability I have to control my actions. Situations have arisen where I do not agree with a choice my patient has made. My first instinct would be…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Healthcare Ethics

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rise in autonomy can be seen as a social reaction to a “paternalistic” tradition within healthcare. Never-the-less there are conflicts between autonomy and beneficence when patients disagree with the recommendations that health care professionals believe are in the patients best interest. In the case of a patients interest conflicting with the patients welfare, many different societies would handle in a variety of ways ( Brody, 1988). For example, western medicine generally defers to the wishes of a mentally competent patient to make his own decisions, even in most cases where the medical team believes that he or she is not acting in his own best interests. However, many other societies prioritize beneficence over autonomy. An example would be when a patient such as June in this case…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays