Preview

David Milgaard Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Milgaard Analysis
David Milgaard, a boy who was considered a hippie, probably thought that the world has ended, and demolish his last goodness left in his soul, when he was proven guilty for a crime that he didn't commit. David spends twenty-three years in prison, two decades, on May 30th, 1969. Milgaard was a sixteen-year-old boy, who was on recreational drugs with his friends, Ron Wilson and Nichol John., they were going on a road trip from Regina to Vancouver at the time that Gail Miller was killed. The boys stopped to pick up another friend, Albert Cadrain, who lived near the spot where Miller's body was found, which the true killer Larry fisher was living under in Albert Cadrain basement. In Milgaard_ inquiry.html said that “Cadrain originally cast suspicion …show more content…
Milgaard denied the utterance of lies which was wrongfully accused him. They didn’t record the evidence that his friends were given to, by the Polygrapher, Roberts, if they did, they could clearly hear that they were perjuring. They didn’t gather up enough material evidence to match up with verbal communication of the people who came out. For example ‘Where was the murder weapon?’.

Section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms specifies rights upon arrest or detention, including the rights to consult a lawyer and the right to habeas corpus., Malgaard didn’t have someone to defend his honor., In(April 13, 2017), www.aidwyc.org, stated that Joyce devoted her life t0 securing justice for her son, launching her own investigation, telling David’s story
…show more content…
(INNOCENCE CANADA), They ask to reopen the case, when Joyce found out about Larry fisher living under Albert Cadrain. Milgaard was released after twenty-three years in prison. Saskatchewan Crown prosecutors decided against retrying him but he was not released formally, his name was not cleared., this clearly goes against number three at legal rights, the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. It took him officially five years until the results a sperm DNA evidence showed that David was not the proven killer, which took twenty-eight years after he was wrongfully accused, which was suppose to be the one of the evidence which means they violated the rights to be detained or imprisoned without a good cause or full evidence, in this they took upon half confession of teenagers that are going true withdrawal of drugs. In exact print Network inc. (2015) In Canada www.aidwyc.org told the story that had us wondering, “Many years later, Ron explained how he and Nichol ended up falsely incriminating his friend. By the time that he made this false statement, he had been in police custody for two days – which also meant that he was coming down from his habitual high (Postmedia). At that time, Ron was a heavy user of several drugs. In consideration of the foregoing, David Milgaard was wrongly convicted for a crime he did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Darryl Hunt worked at a local news department in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. On April 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was found killed and raped. Deborah Sykes was a co worker of Darryl Hunt’s, he claimed they had never talked really while he had worked there. The man who found her dead, called 911 and introduced himself as Sammy Mitchell, although the man was actually John Gray( Innocent Project). The police questioned John Gray and had him do a line up, to find the man he saw with Deborah Sykes. At first John identified a man who was in jail at the time, which police knew the man could not of done it for he was behind bars.( Innocent Project).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1977, the courts blew a chance to get Hansen off the street for a few years. He had stolen a chain saw, and although psychiatric reports made it clear that he was a danger to society, he served only 1 year of a 5-year sentence. He was ordered to stay on a lithium program to control mood swings from a diagnosed bipolar affective disorder, but that order was never enforced, either in prison or after his release. Just a few weeks after his early release, he killed…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Zevin Analysis

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    Brooklyn defense attorney David Zevin almost made legal history last month by attempting to submit functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data as evidence that a key witness was telling the truth. Zevin was defending Cynette Wilson, who claimed that the temping agency she had worked for stopped giving her work following her complaint of sexual harassment.…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This aboriginal man claimed to have been there the night of the murder and testifies that Tshuanahusset was the one that murdered William Robinson. Yet, he did not firsthand see Tshuanahusset kill William Robinson, nor did he immediately report him for the murder either. It was fifteen months before Sue Tas went to the authorities with information on the murder, and this rose no suspicion for neither the authorities nor the judicial system. The fact that Sue Tas waited this long to inform the authorities rises suspicion that perhaps he was lying because there was belief that Sue Tas was Tshuanahusset killed. Although this suspicion was out in the open, the authorities and judicial system still solely relied on Sue Tas as the only witness and did not look further into these circumstances. This could have simply been that Sue Tas saw the opportunity to pin an open case murder on Tshuanahusset which would explain why he reported him much later from when the murder actually occurred. Also, Sue Tas was threatened by his own tribe and chief after he went to the authorities and reported Tshuanahusset. This information was set aside by all authorities because they simply did not want to complicate the investigation and close it as soon as possible. This information could have meant that Sue Tas did something that was unforgivable by his tribe and this would not be revealing information, but perhaps this could be that he lied about the information to falsely convict Tshuanahusset. Furthermore, the complication of Sue Tas as the only witness should have encouraged authorities and the judicial system to look further into the murder case of William Robinson and not solely rely on one witness, yet through they perfunctory behaviour they closed the case quickly and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The opposing parties appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada are; Ruth Schaeffer, Evelyn Minty, Diane Pinder, and Ian Scot. In this situation, Ruth Schaeffer happens to be the biological mother of Mr. Schaeffer. Diane Pinder is the sister of the now deceased Minty and Evelyn Minty is the biological mother of one of the slain males. (Doug Minty). What both families have in common is a male member from both sides was shot and killed by police and the officers involved consulted lawyers before writing producing notes detailing what had transpired. Minty was a developmentally delayed male and Schaeffer was a schizophrenic. The Director of Special Investigations in this tragic situation, Ian Scott, received…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case had a total of three trials which lasted for about ten years. For the first trial Guy Paul was defended by a famous Toronto lawyer named Clayton Ruby (Guy). He was well known for facing tough criminal cases and his main defense in this trial was that the police did not build up a proper case before arresting his client, Guy Paul was then found not guilty but that trial was appealed and a second trial took place six years later. In the second case he was found guilty where he was against Neil McGuigan and was defended by Jack Kofshy (Guy). Unlike the first trial, Guy Paul was found guilty and was send to a lifetime in prison. Then 18 months into his prison sentence he was bailed out for $40,000 and had a third and final trial (Faryon). In this trial came new DNA evidence which proved that the seamen found on the underwear of Christine Jessop did not match Guy Paul’s DNA. With that in mind he was released of all charges and was let go. It took him 10 years and 3 visits to the court to be proven to not be guilty. It was known by him and his family that he was not guilty and that by the end of it all, the actual killer may not be found. This is a story which showcases a life of a man and his struggles against the Canadian justice system. Then finally after ten years he can live life knowing that he will no longer be judged of being a murderer. That is why his life can inspire people to…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first and the most important cause of Milgaard’s wrongful conviction was the question of Milgaard’s two friends, Ron and Nichol. His friends changed the story from the original one and the true version into something the police wanted to listen to. This is because the two friends were heavy drug users and they were put into custody for about 2-3 days, during this time they did not have access to any drugs, which was painful for them. Thus, to leave early, Ron encouraged Nichol to give the police what they wanted to hear and stabbed Milgaard in the back.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McLachlin, B. (2004, June 7). Judges of the Court. Retrieved from Supreme Court of Canada: www.scc-csc.gc.ca…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A letter was written by a man named Medgar Evans. He was an African American man from Mississippi who entered the WW2 at age 19. Medgar was completely out of his comfort zone when he entered the army especially since his whole patrol unit was led by a white lieutenant. The lieutenant favored Medgar and became a mentor teaching him that intelligence would take him far in life and to always strive for something better. Joining the army opened a whole new world for Medgar who had never stepped foot outside of Mississippi. After living in place where racial discrimination was a part of Evans was surprised that some places racism didn’t even exist. When they landed in France a white family opened there home to Medgar where he even had a…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the majority writer in the case of Rodriguez v. British Columbia, you are well aware that this case has and will become a case that will be infamous with ethics vs. the law. You are well aware of the facts and I need not to reiterate them to you. I write to you in response to the courts final decision that was rendered on September 30, 1993. Sue Rodriguez was denied her appeal that section 241(b) of the criminal code violated sections 7, 12 and 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Rodriguez, 1). It is undoubtedly a verdict that used basic ethical decision making principles and theory to deny Sue Rodriguez her rights.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Reynolds Analysis

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Just as a sculptor chisels away amorphous parts of marble, revealing a distinguishable form, so does David Reynolds sculpt the transformation of America to those unfamiliar with the events leading up to World War II. He whittles away an apparent formless generic history and makes sense of the events by exhuming certain concepts. For instance how President Franklin D. Roosevelt helped change the perspective of a reluctant United States to enter a war until the attack on Pearl Harbor. In addition, Reynolds examines the policies between 1938-1941 that were important for U.S. foreign relations and defense. He shapes a comprehensive history and narrates into a concise story from the Munich Conference in 1938 to the attack on Pearl Harbor on December…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court’s judgment in R. v. Morin (1992) 1 SCR 771, set out “administrative guidelines” regarding claims made involving section 11(b) of the Charter, and how to assess the reasonableness of institutional delay. Some of the factors that the Supreme Court considers in regards to whether a delay is reasonable or not includes reasons for the delay, length of the delay, prejudicial effect on the Appellant and any waiver of time periods. In R v. Morin, on behalf of the majority, Sopinka J. explained that depending on the presence or absence of prejudice, the administrative guidelines for institutional delay could be adjusted. Between committal and trial, an eight to ten months administrative guideline was establish by the Court for Provincial Court cases, and following a preliminary hearing a delay of an additional six to eight months is considered reasonable. In R. v. Jordan case, the judge found 32.5 months institutional delay and a two months total Crown delay. Of the 32.5 months institutional delay, overwhelmingly lack of resources caused 19 months of delay in Provincial Court. After examining the total amount of institutional/Crown delay, the judge concluded that this delay “substantially exceeded” the guidelines set out by Morin, but, on its own, it is not an unreasonable delay. The Appellant submitted an application for a stay of proceedings that was dismissed by the trial judge, because the judge concluded, the prejudice experienced by Jordan resulting from the delay was not substantial. According to the judge, the delays were institutional and the Appellant charges were more serious. Any meaningful prejudice experienced by Jordan was not significant. Also, because of a prior conviction, he was subject to a conditional sentence order; his bail condition did not have any significant impact on him and while on bail he was also able to find employment. Thus, the Appellant…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scott Peterson Case

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There was a good amount of evidence used in the Scott Peterson trial by the prosecution but all of it was circumstantial with not one piece of hard evidence. Five key items of evidence that the prosecution used to sway the jury in convicting Scott Peterson were the defenses major blunder from Dr. Charles March, the missing cement, the affair with Amber Frey, the two tarps used on the fishing trip, and finally the ultimate break down of Petersons fishing alibi. The first key item of evidence and the straw that broke the camels back was the complete break down of the defenses key witness Dr. Charles March. Dr. March was brought to the trail as the defenses…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People settle disputes and seek remedy of justice in courts since it was first established in England. Today in Canada, courts must follow certain laws and legislations to ensure that no case will be sentenced without a trial in court. This is to ensure the due process and the fundamental justice in our CJS. However, all these laws, legislations, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom do not always provide people with fairness and justice. In the case of R. v. Sharpe [2001] 2 S.C.R. 45, Sharpe was charged with two counts of possession of child pornography and erotic stories he wrote fantasizing about young boys, titled “Kiddie Kink Classics”. He was acquitted because of his defence using the Charter of Rights and Freedom, the freedom of expression. He argued that he was not going to distribute them and it’s his freedom of expression. Another example is the case of Wilbur Ventling, also freed by the Charter, argued by his defence lawyer that the case has taken too long to go to trial. Which leads us to another common problem in court, is the lengthy time and process it takes for each individual cases. There are limited numbers of judges throughout Canada and only they can decide on cases. This lack of judges results in lengthy time for most cases to appear in courts and not to mention the process in between, where the defence lawyers may ask for more time or try to get technical, and the time for…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays