Preview

Criminal Acts Abd Choice Theory Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
878 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Acts Abd Choice Theory Paper
Heather Moore: Criminal Acts and Choice Theory Paper

Criminal Acts and Choice Theory Paper

Heather Moore

Abstract

“Choice theories state that the decision to commit (or refrain from) crime is an exercise of free will based on the offender’s efforts to maximize pleasure and minimize pain.” In this paper, I will look at choice theories and the common models in how society determines which acts are considered to be criminal, and how these are impacted by choice theories of crime.

Criminal Acts and Choice Theory Paper

Criminal Acts and Choices Paper Choice theories are perspectives on crime causation that states that criminality is the aftermath of conscious choices. It is also known as the rational choice theory. According to this theory, offenders desire to defy the laws when they believe that the cost of doing so does not outweigh the benefits. Choice Theory posits that there is a central behavior to our existence and that it is genetically driven by five needs: responsibility and freedom, power/competence/significance, fun/learning, love/connecting/belonging, and survival. The choice theory also has ten Axioms that are based on a counseling process that is focused on helping clients learn to make good choices. The ten Axioms of choice theories are: (1) all behaviors are assigned by verbs and name by the part that is recognized the most, (2) all behavior is chosen, but we only posses direct control over thinking components and acting. Our feelings and physiology can be indirectly controlled through how we chose to think and act, (3) our behavior is the only behavior we can control ourselves, (4) information is all we can give someone else, (5) relationship problems stem from long-lasting psychological problems, (6) the relationship we had the most problems with is always a part of our present life, (7) total behavior is all behavior and it is made up of four components- feeling, thinking, acting, and physiology, (8) behave is all we do,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two most common models that are used to determine which acts are considered criminal are the consensus model and the conflict model. The consensus model is a model in which the majority of the people within that society share the same basic values and beliefs. If anyone in that society deviates from the established norms of that society and their behavior threatens the well being of the group, than they must be punished. Consensus means majority, so that means that the majority of the people within that group must agree what is considered right and what is considered wrong in order to determine what is to be deemed criminal or not. So when that society’s…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the original crime prevention efforts of rational choice theory…to make the risks far outweigh the benefits of committing crimes, I feel this is no longer an effective view of crime in today’s world.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Crime is caused by the individual exercise of free will. Human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will coupled with rational choice.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits that might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albeit Rational Choice hypothesis does specify the mental and sociological perspectives that the guilty party brings with them into specific circumstances, it builds these viewpoints in light of figuring whether to carry out the wrongdoing or not, as opposed to what sociological or mental impacts would help towards carrying out the wrongdoing in any case i.e. strain, imbalance, destitution, learned conduct and so forth. Thusly it still does not look to clear up the particular's social circumstances. In this sense as demonstrated by Newburn (2007) it fails to make sufficient note of the structural conditions inside which solitary decision making happens (Newburn, 2007,296) Simply Rational Choice speculation does not elucidate the reasons behind executing wrongdoing regardless. It elucidates the process that happens when there is an open entryway for wrongdoing.…

    • 2658 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arming Law-Abiding Theory

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rational choice theory would suggest that these conditions force the criminal to weigh the probabilities of success in committing crime against the probability…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In society, people always want to point a finger as to who did what and why. For centuries, theorists have come up with ideas to try to identify and explain why people commit crimes. What causes them the break the law, even when they know the repercussions for their actions. Many theories have been brought up, but only a few have surpassed time and are approved by society and law enforcement. These choice theories hypothesize on why how and why people commit crimes, they are also accepted through our society and they affect law enforcement as well as the government.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 7 Assignment

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wishhart, H (2013) Criminal Culpability, Criminal Attempts and the Erosion of the Choice Theory, Journal of Criminal Law 77 (1) doi:10.1350/jcla.2013.77.820…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been recommended by some that humans have the capability of demonstrating free will and mindful choice to be a part of or engage in criminal behaviour. Others have recommended that our behaviour is 'pre-established'. With reference to “AJCSD Criminal Behaviour – Free Will v. Determinism” the document critically analyses the above argument from a phycological perspective with regard to free will and determinism stating that freedom has never been absolute, free will and determinism has been a very important aspect in trying to explain and define causality of criminal behaviour it’s important to note that, free will and determinism polarises psychology and law.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term choice theories better yet known as rational choice theories were developed by DR William Glasser in 1995. In Doctor Glasser’s theories he explains human desire to satisfy their genetic needs one has in order to survive. These desires cause humans to make conscious choices and act upon them in any way they decide to ensure the needed desires are satisfied. These theories relate to criminal activity because criminals feel that crime is their only way of fulfilling these desires. The need to survive is a primal instinct shared by all humans. When a person breaks a law, their offense becomes criminal and this affects society through costly trials, the need for more corrections, and housing; thus impacting the economy in a negative way.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you see the words choice, rational and decision you can put together a definition in itself. Criminals choose to make a decision to act in a certain way, which they see, more benefit than harm. When criminals decided to act out and commit a crime they believe that that is the only rational thing to do, there are no other ways to benefit from a given situation. For example, when criminals steal things to turn around and make money by selling the items on the black market; surely the thought of getting caught has to cross their mind at some point. Maybe whether a security camera might catch their faces, they may leave DNA behind that can be traced back to them or even witness that can place them as the thief. Although they may consider these events, they carry out the crime anyways. Thefts see dollar signs instead of jail time. They see that the chance of getting away with the crime and making all of this money is greater than the chance of getting caught and being punished by law…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The case of Miller v. Alabama (2012) is the result of Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals case No. 10-9646, which involves a 14-year-old named Evan Miller who was convicted of aggravated murder, and sentenced by the Alabama state court to a mandatory term of life in prison without parole. Miller and a friend assaulted Miller 's neighbor, and set fire to his home after spending the evening drinking alcohol and using drugs. As a result of his actions, the neighbor died. Miller was originally charged as an adult; however, his case was removed to adult court, and he was charged with murder and arson. During the trial, the jury found Miller guilty of the crime, and he was sentenced to a punishment of life without parole as statutorily mandated (Supreme Court of the United States, 2011).…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Freeman, C.G. (2013). Supreme court cases of interest. Criminal Justice, 28(1), 46-49. Retrieved August 10, 2014 from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1353616933?accountid=458…

    • 815 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays