Preview

Coca-Cola Company Vs. Seaver Of Grove Press Inc.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coca-Cola Company Vs. Seaver Of Grove Press Inc.
The correspondence of letters between Herbert of the Coca-Cola Company and Seaver of Grove Press Inc. serve to establish which company has the precedent to use the slogan “It’s the Real Thing.” Through satire and irony, Seaver undoubtedly offers the more persuasive case.
Herbert appeals to his sense of logos to persuade Seaver to refrain from using the slogan by offering an accumulation of reasons to support his argument. Seaver’s initial tone is one of business sand politeness; upon further inspection, his scathing tone reveals itself by his rebuttal of each of Herbert’s arguments. “We are writing to ask you to stop…” Herbert directly states that his purpose in writing his letter is to persuade Grove Press from using Coca-Cola’s slogan. Seaver rebuts the letter by denying the confusion of the two products. By feigning seriousness about confusion through mockery of “mistaking a book… for a six-pack of Coca-Cola,” Seaver diminishes Herbert’s argument of confusion between the two products by successfully parodying Herbert’s intimidating tone.
…show more content…
“Games People Play… imitations… Games Children Play, Games Psychiatrists Play, Games Ministers Play.” By claiming that Grove Press has had more serious issues with copyright infringements due to “conscious imitations,” Seaver disregards Herbert’s attempt at a pathos appeal to hinder his true threatening tone. Not only does Seaver imply that his use of the slogan was an “unconscious imitation,” but his use of strong diction (“far more direct and deadly threat”) implies that Coca-Cola’s matter was far less serious than Grove Press’s previous problems. Seaver furthers his argument—“sentiments concerning the First Amendment”—by placing Herbert in a predicament that denying Grove Press’s right to use the slogan would eventually harm Coca-Cola’s rights as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The calculations you perform for this CheckPoint form the basis of your analysis of your capstone project.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a written conversation between Ira C. Herbert, an executive of the Coca-Cola Company, and Richard Seaver, a representative of Grove Press, these men convey their viewpoints on the use of the slogan, “It’s the Real Thing.” This marketing phrase was originally used by Coca-Cola over twenty-seven years ago. However, a controversy began once Grove Press began using the catchphrase in order to advertise their book, “Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher,” by Jim Haskins. Throughout their letters, Herbert and Seaver used rhetorical strategies such as historical examples, tone, and sarcasm in order to achieve their purpose of writing a more persuasive case.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an antitrust case that the defendant- Dentsply international, Inc., is one of a dozen manufactures of artificial teeth for dentures and other restorative device. Dentsply dominates the industry, his market share is greater than 75 percent and is about fifteen times larger than that of its next-closest competitor. The defendant use sells his teeth to dealers of dental products; then the dealers supply the teeth to dental laboratories, which fabricate dentures for sale to dentists. As the hundreds of dealer who compete with each other on the basis of price and service; some other manufactures sell their teeth directly to the laboratories basis of on the price and service; Dentsply prohibits its dealers from marketing competitor’s teeth unless they were selling the teeth before 1993. The plaintiff- the federal government files a suit in a federal district court against Dentsply, alleging, a violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Herbert’s wording would be considered as direct diction because of the way he speaks on behalf of the two companies crossing paths due to them both utilizing, “It’s the real thing” for advertising their products (5). As for when Herbert claims that the author of Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher must, “stop using the theme or slogan” since Coca-Cola believes that they own this specific slogan due to utilizing this slogan before the author of the book (7). This may be portrayed as direct diction due to the way they don’t try to beat around the bush, but says specifically that they feel the author must not use this slogan because people may become confused if Coca-Cola and the book are intertwined. Moreover, Coca-Cola includes…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These are two letters full of different rhetorical strategies, from two dissimilar companies. One from Mr. Ira C Herbert who represents the Coca-Cola Company USA, and the other from Mr. R. W. Seaver, the Executive Vice President of Grove Press Inc. The letter first sent is from the Coca-Col…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1970, Grove Press used the slogan "it 's the real thing" in an advertisement for Diary of a Harlem Schoolteacher by Jim Haskins. The Coca-Cola Company had already been using this slogan and similar slogans for approximately 28 years, and as a result a Coca-Cola Company executive, Mr. Ira C. Herbert and Mr. Richard Seaver, who was a representative of Grove Press, have a two letter correspondence in which the use of this slogan is discussed. Although both letters contain similarities in regards to word choice and the use of details and examples, the overall tone and persuasiveness of each letter varies greatly.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He writes that in order to avoid confusion between the respective products due to the slogan, each "sales personnel [is] to make sure that what the customer wants is the book, rather than a Coke." Thus being quite humorous about the whole situation, Seaver maintains a conscious nativity in response to the authoritative and condescending tone of Herbert's letter. Seaver quite innocently writes that neither him nor anyone in the agency "realized that [the Coca-Cola Company] owned the phrase." It is this sort of underlying sarcasm that allows for a persuasive and entertaining argument. However, though Seaver may use biting humor to drive his point across, he manages to keep the letter on a respectful level, although he fully realizes the almost childlike and absurd nature of the…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are you currently stuck and unsure of what major you want to pursue? Do you find yourself stressed over what will happen in the future and what career path you will take? If that is the case, then you’re not alone. Princeton graduate, Ken Saxon addresses this topic to the 2010 freshmen class of the University California, Santa Barbara. He explains that receiving a degree in one particular area does not necessarily mean anything in the real world. Ken Saxon mentions that college is primarily for discovering who you are and what you’re passionate about. Additionally, Saxon uses himself as the perfect example for his argument. In the article, “What Do You Do with a B.A. in History?”, Ken Saxon uses the strategy of logos by presenting well, thought-out examples and logics to prove that having a degree is just the basic outline of one’s success in the future.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pater Rhetoric

    • 3727 Words
    • 15 Pages

    We believe you will agree that it is undesirable for our companies to make simultaneous use of “the real thing” in connection with our respective products. There will always be likelihood of confusion as to the source or sponsorship of the goods, and the use by such prominent companies would dilute the distinctiveness of the trade slogan and diminish its effectiveness and value as an advertising and merchandising tool.…

    • 3727 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Seaver uses satire at the beginning of his letter when stating "the public might be confused…and mistake a book…for a six pack of Coca-Cola." He speculates whether or not the public has enough common sense to justify the difference between the two. Seaver sarcastically aims to solve the confusion by "notifying bookstores that when a customer comes in…they should request the sales personnel to make sure…the customer wants a book, rather than a Coke." In doing this he hints that the request to stop the use of the slogan because of the confusion it may spark is both ridiculous and meaningless. He then uses…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Visual Rhetoric

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Coca-Cola companies' website portrays a plentiful amount of information and images to its visitors. It seems to have a very calm mood embedded into the site.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the third section of Herbert’s letter, he argues how the Coca-Cola company was the first to create the slogan and advertised by them since the beginning. In order to illustrate the sense of ownership Herbert applies at various of dates,“…first used in 1942...1954...summer of 1960 and it is our main thrust for 1970,” (lines 16-17). Utilizing the tone of condescension in the third section, Herbert’s tactic is to dismay ownership and rightful power to the slogan by emphasising the dates and seniority Coca-Cola has. Herbert’s stern and whiny tone of Coca-Cola being the first ones to have used the slogan does not necessarily provide a persuasive argument, unlike Richard Seaver. Seaver instead of just complaining uses a more sympathizing…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    whatupp

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Herbert initiates the first letter, which demands that Seaver, a representative of Grove Press, immediately terminate the use of the catchphrase “It’s the Real Thing”. He beings and ends the letter with a seemingly polite, professional tone and uses the greeting, “Dear Mr. Seaver”, and concluding with “Sincerely, Ira C. Herbert”. However Herbert’s’ sincerity becomes highly questionable based on his tone and other rhetorical techniques in the duration of his letter. In the opening line of paragraph three, Herbert states that, “We believe you will agree that it is undesirable for our companies to make simultaneous use of “the real thing” in connection with our respective products.” The word choice demonstrates an arrogant tone, as Herbert essentially assumes that Seaver and Grove Press will automatically agree with his point. Coca-Cola is a huge company located in New York and well known throughout the nation while Grove Press is an independent publishing company located in Georgia. Herbert expects Grove Press to be inferior because of the size difference in companies and makes that clear through his presumptuous attitude. Furthermore Herbert goes on to use logos in paragraph three when he says, “There will always be likelihood of confusion as to the…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The onion Rhetorical

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the use of criticism, this press release is used to satirize how advertisement is degrading to Americans, and to mock the ordeal methods used by marketers to sell products to consumers as absurd. By using obvious fictional fads, and somewhat surprisingly effective persuasive writing skills, this article is humorous and completely irrelevant. However with the correct use of persuasive writing techniques, mixed with irrelevant, and unrealistic factual information the authors create a humorous satirical scene.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    criticism of Coca-Cola from a range of campaigns using a variety of media over the…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays