Preview

Clean water act

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clean water act
The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law in the United States governing water pollution. Passed in 1972, the act established the goals of eliminating releases of high amounts of toxic substances into water, eliminating additional water pollution by 1985, and ensuring that surface waters would meet standards necessary for human sports and recreation by 1983. Pollutants regulated under the CWA include "priority" pollutants, including various toxic pollutants; "conventional" pollutants, such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), fecal coliform, oil and grease, and pH; and "non-conventional" pollutants, including any pollutant not identified as either conventional or priority. The CWA regulates both direct and indirect discharges. In order to carry out the purpose of this Act, any water quality standard applicable to interstate waters which was adopted by any State and submitted to, and approved by, or is awaiting approval by, the Administrator pursuant to this Act as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, shall remain in effect unless the Administrator determined that such standard is not consistent with the applicable requirements of this Act as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. If the Administrator makes such a determination he shall, within three months after the date of enactment of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, notify the State and specify the changes needed to meet such requirements. If such changes are not adopted by the State within ninety days after the date of such notification, the Administrator shall promulgate such changes in accordance with subsection of this section. Despite public indifference and worry about the threat that new environmental regulations pose to a struggling economy, Democrats in D.C. are charging ahead.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The clean water act was made to make all water fishable and swimmable. The federal government took over the responsibility after individual states failed to do so. They wanted to make the water healthy for people to drink and enjoy.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1950s And 1960s Society

    • 544 Words
    • 1 Page

    ● clean air act­ United States federal law designed to control air pollution on a national…

    • 544 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Waxman Report

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In 1963, the 88th Congress of the United States introduced the Clear Air Act. In this original form was the first law to implement the idea of pollution control. The statue established a federal program within the U.S. Public Health Service and authorized research into techniques for monitoring and controlling air pollution. These techniques were only presented to Congress for further assessment and were not implemented. Thus, Congress enacted the Clear Air Act of 1970 to help enforce imposed regulations. This legislation authorized the development of comprehensive federal and state regulations to limit emissions from both industrial and mobile sources. Moreover, a year later President Nixon gave an executive order establishing the EPA, or Environmental Protection Agency. The agency would provide means to help implement the four major requirements affecting these sources found within the legislation. Seven years later Congress amended the legislation pertaining to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The 1977 Amendments primarily concerned provisions for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of air quality in areas attaining the N.A.A.Q.S. Furthermore, the 1977 Amendments…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Answer: The Clean Water Act (CWA) establishes the structure for regulating the discharge of pollutants into the water within the United States. It also regulates the quality standards for our United States surface waters. The Clean Water Act has made it unlawful to discharge any form of pollutant from any point source into the navigable waters, unless you obtain a permit. With this said; any business is unable to dispose of any pollutants their business may need to discharge in the waters of the United States.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administrative agency

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The propose change is to focus on redefining waters of the United states. The waters of the United States including the regional oceans, yet it doesn't characterize the term waters of the United States. To fill this hole, the EPA and the Corps have promuglated generously indistinguishable regulations characterizing that…

    • 632 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Study Guide

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The federal water pollution control act has two goals: to make U.S. waters clean enough for swimming and wildlife and to end pollution of the nations waterways.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lake Erie Research Paper

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The cleanup was addressed in this paragraph. In 1972 congress passed a clean water act, they tightened dumping regulation. The same year Canada and the United States signed the great lakes to prevent pollution getting in the waterways of the great lakes. The city improved its sewer system and monitor water quality.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes. Section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act clearly provides that the EPA Administrator shall promulgate standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines that, in the Administrator’s judgment, may reasonably endanger the public health or welfare. The EPA argues that carbon dioxide, the basis of greenhouse gas emissions, is not an “air pollutant” within the meaning of the CAA. However, the definition of “air pollutant” is broad enough to encompass any air pollutant, including “any physical, chemical…substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air….” 42 U.S.C. § 7602(g). The EPA further claims it should not be required to issue…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sci207: Week 3 - Outline

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Many of our water resources also lack basic protections, making them vulnerable to pollution from factory farms, industrial plants, and activities like fracking (www.nrdc.org). This can lead to drinking water contamination, habitat degradation and beach closures. NRDC is working to protect our water from pollution by:…

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPA Controversy

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overall, the EPA has been shown, especially through this act, that they have acted irresponsibly and with too much leisure to a major situation. This is problematic for the future because it brings up the question about how they are going to react to other major crises that may appear in the future. If the EPA is seen to maintain this amount of leisure that they displayed in regard to Flint, there is a strong possibility that the crisis will be hyped up by the media and the area itself, just to bring and maintain awareness that something needs to be…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our economy is dependent on good clean water. Unfortunately, we have not always been the best stewards of our resources. The water is no exception. Recently Flint, Michigan has been in the news. The inhabitants of that city were forced to drink bottled water when the city’s water was found to contain large quantities of lead in it. As part of an effort to reduce, spending the city started using water from the Flint River. The Flint River was contaminated long before the switch came. In an article dated 02/26/2016 by theverge.com, Tim Carmody stated “Before processing, the water itself is polluted from four sources: natural biological waste; treated industrial and human waste; untreated waste intentionally or accidentally dumped into the river; and contaminates washed into the river by rain or snow”. Three years later the residents of Flint are still drinking bottled water and are dealing with the consequences of decisions made in the past. According to mich.gov, women and small children should be careful when they eat fish. They have published booklets in several languages to explain the hazards of eating too…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are familiar with the reports of water contamination at some fracking sites and people often claim that such polluted water cannot be used for anything. Citizens in Pennsylvania and other States disappointingly said that they have stopped using the tap water because of the gas coming out of it, making the families sick, and they attribute it to fracking in the locality.[1] There are also environmentalists and general public who are concerned about the billions of liters of water being used in this process. They contest that fracking, more than being merely an environmental issue, is a public health issue and that it needs to be addressed in a comprehensive way.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communities in the rural areas of the United States have been majorly impacted and continue to have health problems and loose animals due to this issue, even when the companies say they “fixed the problem” by adding water filters for clean water tanks. With these so called “fixes” people are still having issues with the water being contaminated. The filter solution took a great deal of time to be an option because oil and gas companies have been slow to respond to consumers with complaints.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since 1970, the Clean Air Act alone has caused the six most common air pollutants, particles, ozone, lead, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, to decrease by 70 percent.9 This has led to a dramatic difference in the quality of air we breathe. There is less ecosystem damage, and crop and timber yields are improved. The Clean Water Act has gone through a similar amelioration. Water pollution has drastically decreased due to the fact that disposing of pollutants in water is not permitted.10 Bodies of water that fish and marine animals live in have more oxygen, allowing more to inhabit one…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clean Water In Texas

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This in turn filtered faster through the ground water of San Antonio and actually helped sustain the local populace (Siedenburg 699). As less limestone “clogging” and other pollutants didn’t inhibit the production of more clean groundwater. The Clean Water Act of 1970 is also at risk, due to corporations demanding it to be unconstitutional, as it inhibited their right to dump in public water systems (Siedenburg 699). It also has been obstructed by the Federal Government by receding information to the public. This is a problem as San Antonio and most Texans are growing increasingly dependent on aquifers and groundwater. With the lack of information and a possible referendum of the bill, there may be a possible water shortage.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays