(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
Freedom of conscience and religion has initiated a lot of irrational controversy, which is why I strongly believe that it is necessary for everyone to understand the right. In Canada, everybody has the right to possess religious beliefs, and to practice and express said beliefs without risk or fear of punishment. They cannot be forced to act in a way that opposes their beliefs, which is why many people …show more content…
Illogically enough, this right is not compulsory all around the world. For instance, burkinis have been banned in fifteen towns in France, including Cannes and Nice. A burkini is a lightweight swimsuit worn by Islamic women that covers the entire body excluding the hands, face, and feet. Burqas, hijabs, and niqabs, also worn by Islamic women, have been banned in French towns as well. In one incident, just after the finalization of the burkini ban in Nice, a woman was confronted by French police for wearing a tunic. She was peacefully resting on a beach in Nice with her family. The unreasonable officers then forced the woman to humiliate herself by removing some of her clothing. They proceeded to give her a ticket, which unrightfully claimed that she was not “wearing an outfit respecting good morals and secularism.” The only component that is immoral about this situation is the infringement of a woman’s right to wear whatever she wants in public, and the harassment she faced in being coerced, with the threat of pepper spray, to undress. If this attack was actually about protecting secularism, then nuns would not be allowed to wear their religious habits in public, but they are. This ban is an attack on cultural