Centralized Versus Decentralized Control in Manufacturing: Lessons from Social Insects

Topics: Ant, Complex system, Honey bee Pages: 23 (8717 words) Published: October 14, 2012
Carl Anderson and John J. Bartholdi, III (2000). Centralized versus decentralized control in manufacturing: lessons from social insects. Pages 92–105 in “Complexity and Complex Systems in Industry,” Proceedings, University of Warwick, 19th–20th September 2000, (McCarthy, I. P. and Rakotobe-Joel, T., Eds.). The University of Warwick, U.K. 652 pp. [ISBN 0 902683 50 0]

Centralized versus decentralized control in manufacturing: lessons from social insects Carl Anderson† and John J. Bartholdi, III School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0205. USA ABSTRACT In our increasingly competitive world, companies must become more flexible, adaptive and responsive. However, this can be difficult in the face of complexities and uncertainties such as worker absenteeism, machine breakdown, and variation in customer behavior. One group of economies that exhibits such flexibility, even in highly unpredictable environments, is social insects: colonies of ants, bees, wasps, and termites. Because insect societies 1) exhibit the flexible and adaptive behavior desired by industry, 2) achieve this flexibility without any central planning or management, and 3) must coordinate many workers, we posit that they may be an important model system for industrial logistics. We explore some of the strong parallels that exist between industrial and social insect operation supporting our claims with case studies from both areas. We highlight issues and insights from our knowledge of insect society operation that may have real practical implications in industrial logistical operation.

Many authors have noted that in our increasingly competitive world, companies need to become more flexible, adaptive, and responsive to customers’ needs (e.g. Drucker 1988; Hayes & Pisano 1994; Castells 1996; Kelly 1998). A general shift is reported from the more traditional hierarchybased organizational structure to flatter and more market-based economies. Numerous companies are adopting “supply chain” models in which they attempt simultaneously to increase the integration and coordination between their operations and those of their suppliers and customers (e.g. Bowersox 1991; Castells 1996; Nelson 1998; Sweeney 2000). Unfortunately, faced with the complexities and uncertainties of industry and customer behavior, such integration and coordination in an efficient and adaptive manner can be extremely difficult. However, one group of “economies” that has achieved this goal and has proven extremely successful—and has been doing this not just for many years, but many millions of years—are the social insects: ants, bees, wasps, and termites. Insect societies, a term that refers explicitly to the colony level in social insects, are just as much an economy as any factory and importantly face the same logistical challenges. For instance, insect societies must cope with competition for resources and often must deal with a widely changing and unpredictable environment (e.g. Wilson 1971; Seeley 1995). In addition, colonies may be enormous, requiring the coordination of hundreds of thousands, and in some cases, millions, of workers. Contrary to popular belief, the colonies’ activities are generally not coordinated in a centralized manner by the queen(s) but exhibit a very flat organizational structure. Individual workers do not have a global picture of colony operation but act upon local information in real time using simple rules and simple responses (Bonabeau et al. 1997, 1999; Karsai 1999). The result however, of many individuals concurrently acting in such a manner means that a colony is not just a collection of small-brained individuals, but a complex adaptive system (e.g. Seeley 1997; Bonabeau 1998). Because insect societies 1) exhibit the flexible and adaptive behavior desired by industry, 2) achieve this flexibility without any central planning or management, and 3) they must coordinate many workers, we posit...

References: Aarts, E.H.L., Korst, J.H.M. and Laarhoven, P.J.M. van. (1997). Simulated annealing. Pages 91– 120 in: Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization (E.H.L. Aarts, and J.K.L. Lenstra, Eds.) John Wiley & Sons, New York. Anderson, C. and McShea, D.W. Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol. Rev. (Camb), in press. Appleby, S. and Steward, S. (1994). Mobile software agents for control in telecommunications networks. BT Technol. J. 12: 104–113. Bartholdi, J. J., III. (1993) Interactive program to balance assembly lines. Int. J. Prod. Res. 31: 2447–2461. Bartholdi, J.J., III and Eisenstein, D.D. (1996). A production line that balances itself. Oper. Res. 44: 21–34. Bartholdi, J. J., III, Bunimovich, L.A. and Eisenstein, D.D. (1999). Dynamics of two- and threeworker "bucket brigade" production lines. Oper. Res. 47: 488–491. Bartholdi, J. J., III, Eisenstein, D.D. and Foley, R. A. Performance of bucket brigades when work is stochastic. Oper. Res., in press. Beebe, W. (1921). Edge of the Jungle. Henry Holt and Company, New York. Bonabeau, E. (1998). Social insect colonies as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1: 437– 443. Bonabeau, E., and Théraulaz, G. (2000). Swarm smarts. Sci. Am. 282: 72–79. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M. and Théraulaz, G., 1999. Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Santa Fe Institute on the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford University Press, New York. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M. and Théraulaz, G. (2000). Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour. Nature 406: 39–42.
Bonabeau, E., Théraulaz, G., Deneubourg J.L., Aron, S. and Camazine, S. (1997). Selforganization in social insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 188–193. Bonabeau, E., Hénaux, F., Guérin, S., Snyers, D., Kuntz, P. and Théraulaz, G. (1998). Routing in telecommunications networks with smart ant-like agents. Pages 60-71 in: Proceedings of Intelligent Agents for Telecommunication Applications, IATA’98. (S. Albayrak and F.J. Garijo, Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1437. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Bowersox, D.J. (1991). Improving the logistics/marketing/sales interface. Pages 243–255 in: Annual Conference Proceedings, Vol. I, Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL. Camazine, S. (1991). Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honey bee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 61–76. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Mass. Davidow, W.H. and Malone, M.S. (1992). The Virtual Corporation: Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century. Harper Collins, New York. Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. and Verhaeghe, J.C. (1983). Probabilistic behaviour in ants: a strategy of errors? J. Theor. Biol. 105: 259–271. Deneubourg, J.L., Aron, S., Goss, S. and Pasteels, J. M. (1987). Error, communication and learning in ant societies. Europ. J. Oper. Res. 30: 168–172. Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S., Beckers, R. and Sandini, G. (1991). Collectively self-solving problems. Pages 267–278 in: Self-organization, Emerging Properties, and Learning (A. Babloyantz, Ed.). Plenum Press, New York. Drucker, P.F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66(1): 45–53. Franks, N.R. (1989). Army ants: a collective intelligence. Am. Sci. 77: 139–145. Franks, N.R., Gomez, N., Goss, S. and Deneubourg, J.L. (1991). The blind leading the blind in army ant raiding patterns: testing a model of self-organisation (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 4: 583–607. Frazelle, E.H. (1992). Material Handling Systems and Terminology. Lionheart Publishing Inc., Atlanta. Frisch, K. von. (1967). The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Geake, R. (1994). How simple ants can sort out BT 's complex nets. New Scientist 141(1915): 20. Gordon, D.M. (1995). The development of organization in an ant colony. Am. Sci. 83: 50–57. Gordon, D.M. (1999). Ants at Work. Free Press, New York. Gotwald, W.H. (1995). Army Ants: the Biology of Social Predation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Guérin, S. (1997). Optimisation multi-agents en environment dynamique: application au routage dans les Réseaux de Télécommunications. DEA Dissertation, University of Rennes I, France. Hayes, R.H., and Pisano, G.P. (1994). Beyond world-class: the new manufacturing strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 72(1): 77–86. Hubanks, B. (1998). Self-organizing military logistics. Pages 51–57 in: Embracing Complexity: A Colloquium on the Application of Complex Adaptive Systems to Business. The Ernst & Young Center for Business for Business Innovation. Cambridge, Mass. Jenkins, M.J., Sneyd, J., Camazine, S. and Murray, J.D. (1992). On a simplified model for pattern formation in honey bee colonies. J. Math. Biol. 30: 281–306. Karsai, I. (1999). Decentralized control of construction behavior in paper wasps: an overview of the stigmergy approach. Artificial Life 5: 117–136. Kelly, K. (1998). New Rules for the New Economy: 10 Strategies for a Connected World. Viking, New York. Krebs, C.J. (1994). Ecology: the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. Harper Collins, New York. Lewin, R. (1995). Complexity: Life on the Edge of Chaos. Phoenix Paperbacks, London. Lloyd, J.E. (1983). Bioluminescence and communication in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28: 131– 160. Miller, J.G. (1981). Fit production systems to the task. Harvard Bus. Rev. 59(1): 145–154. Morley, R. (1996). Painting trucks at General Motors: the Effectiveness of a complexity-based approach. Pages 53–58 in: Embracing Complexity: A Colloquium on the Application of
Complex Adaptive Systems to Business. The Ernst & Young Center for Business for Business Innovation. Cambridge, Mass. Morley, R., and Ekberg, G. (1998). Cases in chaos: complexity-based approaches to manufacturing. Pages 97–102 in: Embracing Complexity: A Colloquium on the Application of Complex Adaptive Systems to Business. The Ernst & Young Center for Business for Business Innovation. Cambridge, Mass. Nelson, K. (1998). You want it, you got it. Software Strategies Mag. 3(5): 26–30. Oster, G.F. and Wilson, E.O. (1978). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Peters, T. and Austin, N. (1985). A Passion for Excellence: the Leadership Difference. Random House, New York. Pol, J. van der and Akkermans, H.A. (2000). 'No one in the driver seat ': An agent-based modelling study of swarm-like behaviour in industrial supply chain coordination. Pages 621643 in: Pre-Prints 11th Int. Working Seminar on Production Economics, Igls, Vol. 3. Reyes, J.L. and Fernández-Haegar, F. (1999). Sequential co-operative load transport in the seedharvesting ant Messor barbarus. Insectes Soc. 46: 199–125. Schneirla, T.C. (1944). A unique case of circular milling in ants, considered in relation to trail following and the general problem of orientation. Am. Mus. Novitates 1253: 1–26. Schneirla, T.C. (1971). Army Ants: a Study in Social Organization (H.R. Topoff, Ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. Schoonderwoerd, R., Holland, O., Bruten, J. and Rothkrantz, L. (1996). Ant-based load balancing in telecommunications networks. Adpat. Behav. 5: 169–207. Seeley, T.D. (1995). The Wisdom of the Hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Seeley, T.D. (1997). Honey bee colonies are group-level adaptive units. Am. Nat. 150: 22–41. Seeley, T.D. (1998). Thoughts on information and integration in honey bee colonies. Apidologie 29: 67–80. Shaw, J.L., Wilhelm, M.R. and Usher, J.S. (1998). The closest open location assignment rule in AS/RS revisited. 7th IERC Proceedings [on CD-ROM]. Stone, B. (2000). King of the VCs. Newsweek (April 17): 68c–e. Sweeney, R. (2000). “The last 100 yards”: Customer Service and Store Profitability Through eReplenishment. Industri-Matematik International Corp., unpublished white paper [www.im.se]. Tompkins, J.A, Smith, J.D. and Harmelik, D. (1995). Selected Chapters from The Warehouse Management Handbook and The Distribution Management Handbook. McGraw Hill, New York. Useem, J. (1999). Internet defense strategy: cannibalize yourself. Fortune 140 (6 Sep.): 121–134. Valen, L. van. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theor. 1: 1–30. Ward, M. (1998). There 's an ant in my phone. New Scientist 157(2118): 32–35. Weidenmüller, A. and Seeley, T.D. (1999). Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 190–199. Wilhelm, M.R., and Shaw, J.L. (1997). An empirical study of the closest `open location rule’ for AS/RS storage assignments. Pages 639–650 in: Progress in Material Handling Research 1996 (R.J. Graves, L.M. McGinnis, D.L. Medeiros, R.E. Ward, and M.R. Wilhelm, Eds.). Braun-Brumfield Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Wilson, E.O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. Wilson, E.O. (1985). Between caste aversion as a basis for division of labor in the ant Pheidole punctiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 35–37.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Social Insects Essay
  • Social control, discipline and regulation Essay
  • Centralized and decentralized Essay
  • Essay on Social Insects
  • Essay about Centralized and Decentralized Government
  • control Essay
  • Centralized and Decentralized Essay
  • Social Control Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free