Preview

Case Study: Martin Manufacturing Company

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Martin Manufacturing Company
A. Martin Manufacturing Company Historical and Industry Average ratios Ratio | Actual 2004 | Actual 2005 | Actual 2006 | Industry average 2006 | Current ratio | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.5 | Quick ratio | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.2 | Inventory turnover (times) | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.3 | 10.2 | Average collection period | 50.7 days | 55.8 days | 58 days | 46 days | Total asset turnover(times) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | Debt ratio | 45.8% | 54.3% | 57% | 24.5% | Times interest earned ratio | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 2.5 | Gross profit margin | 27.5% | 28.0% | 27% | 26.0% | Net profit margin | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 1.2% | Return on total assets (ROA) | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 2.4% | Return on common equity (ROE) | 3.1% | 3.3% | 2.6% | 3.2% | Price/ earnings (P/E) ratio | 33.5 | 38.7 | 34.48% | 43.4 | Market/ book (M/B) ratio | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.88 | 1.2 |

B.
Liquidity
Current ratio in 2004 is 1.7 and in 2005 1.8 . In 2006, the current ratio is increasing in trend and there is a big difference between 2005 and 2006 years. This may be caused by increase in current assets and decrease in current liabilities. It means that the company is not defending much on loans and credits advances to finance its operations. Also company is very liquid. But a very liquid condition means sometimes low profitability.
The firm has normal quick ratio. In 2005 it is decreasing but in 2006 it’s increasing. It is because of decrease in the company’s current liabilities in 2006. The company has ability to meet its current liabilities using its most liquid assets. It is recommended to have a quick ratio of 1.0. Comparing to the situation of the industry, the company is in quite a good position. As for the time-series analysis, it remains stable during these three years.

Activity
Martin Manufacturing Company’s Inventory management seems to be stable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fnt Task 1

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Current Ratio” measures the ability to pay current liabilities with current assets. The current assets divided by current liabilities. In 2011 the current ratio was 1.86. By 2012, it decreased to 1.79 rating in the lower second quartile group in the industry. Company G’s ability to repay its debt is consistent with showing a weakness from year to year based on the industry’s quartiles of 3.1 with a strong ability to cover liabilities 2.1median to 1.4 stating an weakness.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fsa Ch.5

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Current ratio is an indicator of a company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. A decrease in current ratio may not a be a good sign.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strength of Mark X as a company is its fixed assets turnover ratio, which rose from 1990 to 1992. This tells us Mark X 's ability to generate net sales from each addition of a fixed asset. Sales generated from the fixed assets are greater than the costs of the fixed assets, which imply that the fixed assets that were purchased are good investments for the company. This is really the only positive ratio they have at the moment. Weaknesses we found in Mark X were its debt ratio, which increased from 40.47% in 1990 to 46.33% in 1991 and from 46.33% to 59.80% in 1992. This shows us Mark X 's amount of debt relative to its assets is increasing and that its debt is equal to more than half of its assets by 1992. The current ratio and quick ratio has also indicated negative change, both decreasing between 1990 and 1992. The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company 's ability to pay short term obligations, while the quick ratio shows a company 's ability to pay its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Both ratios are steadily decreasing, indicating to us the position of the company has become less and less favorable.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Its 2012 current ratio and quick ratio are 1.93 and 0.75 respectively. Its 2013 current ratio and quick ratio are 1.75 and 0.69 respectively. This suggests the company is still healthy in terms of carrying cash and cash equivalents, even though its current liabilities have increased in 2013.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladbrokes Vs Hill

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most companies use current ratio in order to estimate their financial position. This ratio compares liquid assets with short term liabilities. A current ratio, higher or equal 1.0, informs that current assets should cover current obligations in case of bankruptcy. Quick ratio is more accurate ratio of liquidity rather than current ratio, because it contains solely the most liquid assets and eliminates the inventory that might be difficult to convert into…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xacc/280 Final

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Low current ratios values imply that a company could have trouble meeting current obligation but a very high current ratio could imply that the company is not managing its resources well.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current ratio for the company has been on a steady decline over the last three years. From the standpoint of a creditor, the reduction of the company's current ratio is not good as the company's short term liabilities is outgrowing its current assets. However, when you look at the company's balance sheets, you see that cash was depleted to be invested in long term assets (property, plant & equipment). The cash depletion along with the increase in Notes Payable attributed to the decline in the current ratio which indicates the company has used cash and short term notes payable to increase their capital assets. From the standpoint of an investor, this is good as the company took an idol asset (cash) and used it to help build capacity to increase sales.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing the year 2010 to 2011, the ratio has decreased which means that the dollar amount of current assets per dollar of liability is lower (Birt et al. 2010). According to Birt et al. (2010), having a high current ratio means that the business has excess investments to unprofitable assets – cash, receivables, and inventory. The decrease in ratio means now that they are trying to make use of these unprofitable assets by increasing their liability, though their ability to meet short term financial debt is met (above 1) which means that their liquidity is in a good position.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bp Accounting Ratios

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The current ratio has increased by 0.0534 from 0.9900 to 1.434. As the current ratio is a measure of liquidity and ability to meet short-term debt requirements, BP was more able to meet their short term debt obligations in 2005 than 2004. From 2001 to 2003 the current ratios were 1.0767, 0.9733, and 0.9600 respectively. In 2001, 2002, and 2004, BP?s current liabilities were greater than current assets, indicating that BP may have faced some difficulty in meeting short-term debt obligations during these years. In 2003 and 2005 the current ratios were greater than 1, representing that BP?s current assets were greater then its current liabilities for the year. BP?s current ratios are less than the industry average, which simply means that there are other companies that are more successful at meeting short term debt obligations than BP for the industry. The industry median for the current ratio is 1.26.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Beer Company

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The current ratio is a test of short-term debt-paying ability. In 2005 the current ratio for the company was 3.1 and in 2006 it was 2.94. I believe that the decline in the ratio could be due to eliminating slow selling products and other stagnant current assets along with an improvement in the financial situation. Generally, a current ratio is suppose to be around 2 on average, but the adequacy of a current ratio depends a lot on the make-up of the assets. It seems like The Boston Beer Co. is on the right track…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke vs. Pepsi

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The two companies are difficult to distinguish as both companies have made investments however the method in which they have made those investments differ. Coke has approximately 45% of its total assets through investments made in the bottling industry. Pepsi has consolidated financial statements taking into account Frito Lay as a subsidiary. It would appear that Pepsi is the larger company because their total amount of assets is greater due to the consolidation of Pepsi and Frito Lay. However this in turn leads to Pepsi carrying significantly more debt in its financial structure compared to Coke ($4,028 vs. $687)…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Ratio

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. For this reason, the ratio excludes inventories from current assets…

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Evaluate the economics of Gulf's exploration and development program in net present value terms. How do Gulf's outlay for exploration and development compare to cash returns Gulf generates from these activities.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Current Ratio – is an indication of a company 's ability to meet the company’s short-term debt obligations.…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Herman Miller Strategy

    • 7245 Words
    • 29 Pages

    In the case of Herman Miller Inc., their current ratio showed some slight increase of about 1 percent from 2008 to 2009. However, a drop of about 21 percent was experienced in 2010 but they were still able to maintain a current ratio of greater than 1. In the year 2011 and 2012, there had been a tremendous increase in their current ratio to 1.76 and 1.81 respectively. This current ratio of greater than 1 provides additional cushion against unforeseeable contingencies that may arise in the short term. In the case of HNI, their current ratio showed a moderate increase of about 7 percent from 2008 to 2009. However, for the subsequent years, HNI experienced a decrease in their current ratio of approximately 10 percent from 2010 all the way to 2012. Nonetheless, they were able to maintain a current ratio of at least 1 to ensure that the value of their current assets covers at least the amount of their short term obligations. As for Steelcase, their current ratio showed a moderate increase of about 8 percent from 2008 to 2010. On the other hand, the company experienced a decrease of roughly 8 percent in the year 2011 but they were still able to maintain a current ratio of greater than 1. However, Steelcase managed to have an increase in their current ratio from 1.37 in 2011 to 1.52 in…

    • 7245 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays