Preview

Case Digest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Digest
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-12342
August 3, 1918
A.A. ADDISON, plaintiff-appellant,
Vs.
MARCIANA FELIX and BALBINO TIOCO, defendants-appellees.
FACTS: By a public instrument dated June 11, 1914 plaintiff Addison sold to the defendant Marciana Felix and husband Balbino Tioco, 4 parcels of land. Defendants paid, at the time of the execution of the deed, the sum of P3,000.00 on account of the purchase price, and bound herself to pay the remainder in installments. It was further stipulated that the purchaser was to deliver to the vendor 25 per centum of the value of the products that she might obtain from the 4 parcels “from the moment she takes possession of them until the Torrens certificate of title be issued in her favor.” It was likewise covenanted that “within one year from the date of the certificate of title in favor of Marciana Felix, she may rescind the contract of sale in which she shall be obliged to return to Addison the net value of all the products of the 4 parcels sold, and Addison shall be obliged to return to her all the sums that she may have paid, together with interest at the rate of 10 percent per annum.
However, Addison was able to designate only 2 of the 4 parcels and more than two-thirds of these two were found to be in the possession of one Juan Villafuerte, who claimed to be the owner of the parts so occupied by him.
Addison filed suit in Court of First Instance (CFI) in Manila to compel Felix to make payment of the first installment, in accordance with the terms of the contract and of the interest at the stipulated rate. Defendant answered and alleged that the plaintiff had failed to deliver the lands that were the subject matter of the sale.
ISSUES:
I. Whether or not the delivery had been effected by reason of the issuance of the Torrens Certificate of title, notwithstanding the fact that the thing sold was not subject to the control of the vendor.
II. Whether or not the purchaser can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Carmichael should be allowed to purchase the Rocking M Ranch (ranch). Although the Statute of Frauds (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 26.01 (West 2005)) makes oral contracts for the sale of land unenforceable, an common law exception is carved out for sales in which buyers pay consideration, make improvements, and demonstrate possession of the land. Hooks v. Bridgewater, 111 Tex. 122 (1921). The policy behind the statute itself is to prevent people from fraudulently claiming someone else’s property, but the exception is present in order to protect parties who reasonably believe that an oral sale of land was executed. Carmichael paid consideration and made improvements to the ranch, so only possession is at issue here.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark Realty Inc., a real estate broker, entered into four separate agreements with owner Tilman A. Rogness. Mark Realty was entitled to “exclusive right of sale.” For a stated period of time, this agreement gave the broker the exclusive right of sale for the property for a stated price and on stated terms. During the time provided, Rogness “canceled, revoked, and terminated” the brokerage agreements before the properties sold. The broker sued on account that brokerage commission was never received from the owner. The owner argued that since he canceled the contracts before the properties were sold, the broker never performed their duties and therefor was not entitled to commission. The trial judge ruled that Mark Realty Inc. had entered into a unilateral contract with Rogness which meant that the broker would only receive commission if he performed by “finding a purchaser of the above property.” The trial judge ruled in favor of the owner (University of Phoenix, 2012, Mark realty, Inc. v. Rogness).…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Briefing

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kenneth Rokicki was charged and convicted of a hate crime based on the predicate offense of disorderly conduct. Before the case went to trial, Rokicki moved to dismiss the charges alleging, among other things, that the hate crime statute was unconstitutional. His motion was denied. Upon waving his right to a jury trial, Rokicki’s case proceeded to bench trial where he received a sentence of two years of probation, anger management counseling, and 100 hours of…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff Wendling, who was a farmer and stockman, met Defendant Puls, who was a cattle buyer in July 1973. The two got to talking and Wendling informed Puls that there was a possibility that he would have cattle for sale around mid August. On August 13th, Puls received a call from Wendling letting him know that he had cattle ready to be sold. The two later met, along with Puls’s financial assistance Watson and agreed on a sales price based on the weight of the cattle on August 16th. Puls left a deposit of 1,000 dollars with Wendling for the cattle. On the scheduled date for pick up, Puls requested an additional week for delivery of the cattle. Needless to say, after the week went by there was no sign of Puls. He failed to respond to any of phone calls or messages left by Wendling. When he was finally able to reach Puls on August 27th, he learned that Puls didn’t have a place to store the cattle. Since there were so many issues, Wendling asked Puls for an additional down payment, which was refused by Puls. Puls went on to suggest that maybe he should just sell his cattle to someone else. At that time, Wendling suggested to Puls that he provide him with a written release, which he just ignored. Wendling went on to seek legal advice and was advised to get a written release from Puls before engaging in another sale of the cattle. Wendling tried to reach Puls, but was unsuccessful; however he was able to reach Watson. He asked Watson if they both would meet him at his lawyers’ office, so that he could obtain a release from the contract in order…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fct V Whitfords

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * This is considered to be a process of realizing capital because the land can no longer be used…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    KILARJIAN v. VASTOLA

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On March 18, 2004, plaintiff’s, Carol Kilarjian and Dave de Castro, and defendants, John Vastola and Joan Vastola, entered into a contract for the sale of 136 East Cliff St., Somerville. The final date was scheduled for June 15, 2004. On June 14, 2004, defendant’s real estate attorney wrote plaintiff’s attorney stating that defendants had elected not to proceed to convey title. Plaintiff’s contended that the difference in the financing costs they experience because of the delay should be presented as damages because the breach by defendants will result in a higher financing cost. Also, plaintiffs strongly stress the breach of contract because they suffered costs and attorney’s fees as well as financing costs for the delay in acquiring a second mortgage obligation; Defendant’s delay should be calculated as damages for plaintiffs. On June 15, 2004, plaintiffs' real estate attorney forwarded a time-of-the-essence letter to defendants, setting a closing date of June 25, 2004. Defendants failed to close and are not willing to close on the property. Defendants do not dispute the weight of the contract. However, Mrs. Vastola's spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) began to accelerate. In defense of their position, defendants provided a letter from Mrs. Vastola's doctor, Mark J. Brown, which explained that SMA is a progressive neurological condition that, as a result, disables her from all daily activities because of her arms and legs are weak which results in putting Mrs. Vastola in no condition to sell her house and move. Correspondingly the defendants argue that since the time they signed the contract for the sale of the home, Mrs. Vastola’s conditions become increasingly worse, should excuse the performance in proceeding with the sale of their house. Besides the plaintiffs were well aware of Mrs. Vastola’s condition when…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Briefing

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 216 Cal.App.3d 3888, 264 Cal.Rptr. 779 [1](1990) Court of Appeals of California.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This encroachment may constitute a defect in title as the vendor cannot pass to John the part of the land the subject of the encroachment.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Robert Briggs and his wife purchased a home located at 167 Lower Orchard Drive, Levittown, Pennsylvania. They made a down payment and borrowed the balance on a 30-year mortgage. Six years later, when Mr. and Mrs. Briggs were behind on their mortgage payments, they entered into an oral contract to sell the house to Winfield and Emma Sackett if the Sacketts would pay the three months’ arrearages on the loan and agree to make the future payments on the mortgage. Mrs. Briggs and Mrs. Sackett were sisters. The Sacketts paid the arrearages, moved into the house, and continued to live there. Fifteen years later, Robert Briggs filed an action to void the oral contract as in violation of the Statute of Frauds and evict the Sacketts from the house. Who wins? Briggs v. Sackett, 275 Pa. Super. 13, 418 A.2d 586, Web 1980 Pa.Super. Lexis 2034 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania).…

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * “Defendant seeks vacation of a default judgment, contending that the trial lacked jurisdiction over him. We reversed.” (p.199)…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, Stafford Fontenot, Steve Turner, Mike Montelaro, Joe Sokol, and Doug Brinsmade decided to go to Atlanta, Georgia, the site of the Olympic Games to sell Cajun food. They started the preparations about 6 month before, choosing “Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana” as their name. On May 19, they applied for a license with the designated department in Fulton County, Georgia. Later on, Mr Fontenot and his friends, agreed to buy a mobile kitchen to Ted Norris for the amount of $50,000. After negotiations, they paid $8,000 down payment with a check, using the “Prairie Cajun Seafood Catering of Louisiana’s” checking account and the balance was divided in two promissory notes ($12,000 and $20,000). Stafford Fontenot was the only name listed on the notes, but once Mr Norris’s lawyer agreed to add “doing business as Prairie Cajun Seafood” after Fontenot’s name, he signed the promissory notes dated June 12, 1996. Over a month later, on July 31, the group signed an article of partnership containing specific divisions of profits and losses. Ready to enter into the market, they went to Atlanta, but business did not go well and they couldn’t pay the promissory notes. Consequently, Mr Norris filed a suit against Mr Fontenot to recover the amounts due on the notes. The defendant affirmed they didn’t pay for the notes but that he was only liable for his part of the debt, because he signed the notes on behalf of the partnership. Ted Norris, on the other hand, testified that he did business with Stafford Fontenot and he assumed that the rest of the group was associated with Stafford who, according to Mr Norris believed, owned the company.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contract memorandum

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Joseph A. Cardillo Revocable Trust v. Cardillo, 17 LCR 55 (Mass. Land Ct. 2009), is that Joseph seeks specific performance of the agreement and an order that…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case management

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case management has become the standard method of managing health care delivery systems today. In recent decades, case management has become widespread throughout healthcare areas, professionals, and models in the United States; and it has been extended to a wide range of clients (Park &ump; Huber, 2009). The primary goal of case management is to deliver quality care to patients in the most cost effective approach by managing human and material resources. The focus of this paper is on the concept of case management and how it developed historically, the definition of case management, the components of case management, and how it relates to other nursing care delivery models.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Google Case Digest

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is the nature of network effects in paid search markets? Do you expect Google to sustain its present domination in this market?…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Angela Woodside Case Study

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Facts: Angela Woodside, a resident of New York, inherited ten acres of land in Ohio. She decided to sell the property to Doyle Contactors, Inc. for the sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00). Doyle Contractors entered into a contract with Angela Woodside for the purchase of the above property on June 1, 2007. As part of the contract, Ms. Woodside provided owner financing by accepting a $100,000 down payment from Doyle Contractors and agreeing to receive the remaining $400,000 in monthly installments over a ten (10) year period.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays