Preview

Bargaining with the Devil. When to Negotiate, When to Fight

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bargaining with the Devil. When to Negotiate, When to Fight
Bargaining with the devil. When to negotiate, when to fight
Prof. Robert Mnookin

Should you bargain with the devil?
Not always, but more often than you feel like it, for two reasons: - emotions are getting in the way of clear thinking - being prepared to bargaing means willing to give the pursuit of justice
You should make decisions by looking to the future, you have to analyze the cost and benefits of negotiating versus all other options. You also need to address all the moral and ethical issues involved in deciding whether to negotiate with the devil (an enemy)

Bargain is an atempt to try to resolve a conflicto to negotiation.
The devil can be represented as: - someone who has or may hurt you - someone who you don’t trust - somone who may feel is evil

The main idea it’s what to do if someione does wrong in business, do you ignore them and go straight to warfare or litigation?
That’s the tricky question. If you attempt to make a deal with the other party you are accepting their authority and position.
So what should do it’s to try to resolve all conflicts through negotiation rather than fighting.

You should always be prepared to negotiate, but you also should know when to no negotiate, depending on the circunstancies.

At the conference he offered the example of Wiston Churchill, who decided not to negotiate with the Nazi Germany. Churchill was appointed as prime minister of Britain, it was a matter of time before Britain will be fighting alone against Germany, so many a couple of members of Churchill’s war cabinet suggested to negotiate with Hitler. Churchills disagree, it the worst was going to happen, it was better to go down fighting. Churchill decided to fight and no to negotiate.
Churchill is one of Robert Mnookin heroes, because he fight to the death if necessary, that time negotiating with the devil doesn’t seem heroic.
Another example was Nelson Mandela. He had been in prisión for 23 years, and he had always refused to negotiate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    PROJ410 Mid-Term

    • 2501 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Student Answer: the lead negotiator will, at some point, likely be regarded as hostile by the other party…

    • 2501 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Sluggers Come Home

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both parties want to make the deal. They both know it could benefit both sides to make the negotiation flow, but there’s some differences between that makes a little hard to involve in.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    City of Middlevale

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In negotiations there are key stakeholders. These are usually the parties that have the most to gain or lose in the…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He explains that the alliance did not happen immediately and that it too time to form. He notes that the idea of self-determination was discussed between Churchill and Roosevelt, which shows Churchill's priorities in preserving the British Empire. Roosevelt goal was to put a stop to Hitler's growing power and to end European…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many global companies use different negotiation techniques to maximize profit when bargaining a contract with a new prospect. In this paper, the author will discuss two specific strategies and two negotiation process used in two articles.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the negotiation, I do not think any of us really controlled the situation from the beginning. Nevertheless, not wanting the negotiation to stay focused on the price, I kept making new propositions. I believe it worked well to show my will to find a solution that would work for both of us.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Myti-Pet Case Report

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    While Churchill’s power to inspire, his strategic foresight, his driving passion, and his unstoppable personality were the core qualities that made him an effective leader and statesman, the realization that he too was a “worm” tempered his character and kept him focused. His lifetime spanned not only the two World Wars of the 20th century but other conflicts, historic diplomatic meetings, and the onset of the Cold War. Winston Churchill led the British nation on two separate occasions as prime minister, in peace and in war, and on two separate occasions as First Lord of the Admiralty, both in the office and on the frontline. Yet, he steadfastly refused to take the credit. When cheered at the demise of Nazi Germany, he responded, “I have never accepted what many people have kindly said, namely that I inspired the nation. It was a nation and race dwelling all round that had the lion heart. I had the luck to be called upon to give the…

    • 3594 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Midterm Review Outline

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Brute Force vs. Coercion - Brute force can only do what requires no collaboration. If there is no question as to who would win a military battle – fight, otherwise – bargain.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus vs. Everyman

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bargaining is the third step toward achieving Acceptance. It is very evident in Everyman because Everyman bluntly offers Death riches and fortunes just so he may have a few more days. He will pay Death just to allow him to postpone the trip or hopefully even cancel it. This shows a very clear example of man trying to bargain his way out of fate…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Protecting yourself sometimes becomes a difficult task when you are on the opposite side from the “power”. You get become “panicky” or too accommodating, forgetting that you have something the other party wants, assets. A good way to overcome these issues is to stipulate a bottom line – what you consider the worst acceptable outcome. This is a good tool to resist pressure, especially if you have someone on your side to help reinforce that limit. On the counter side, this “help” can be costly (when it involves brokers, agents…) and, too rigid, limiting our imagination and creativity to invent other solutions that could better respond to both parties’ intentions. To overcome this “incapacitation” and to make the most of the whole negotiation process, you should know your BATNA – Best Alternative To a Negotiation Agreement. By know your BATNA (a measurement tool) that not only gives you better standards but is also more flexible then bottom line solution, it allows you to use imagination and invent other solutions that better satisfy our interests, but it may also be to uncertain, not giving you an actual limit.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Winston Churchill in Ww2

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Winston Churchill was made Prime Minster of Great Britain on May 10, 1940. Historians have analyzed Churchill’s impact on the Second World War, especially from his appointment in 1940 until 1941. This period of the war is seen as being a crucial time for Britain, a time when they had to fight the war alone against Germany. Churchill’s appointment was not well received by everyone, as many people were unsure of his ability. However, for Churchill, he was waiting for this moment. Churchill’s first test was a peace offer from Hitler. Unlike Chamberlain, Churchill wanted absolutely nothing to do with this peace offer. He believed fully in never surrendering and his main war aim was complete victory. This was seen by many to be the wrong choice and that appeasement should be chosen before war. Churchill was adamant and believed, rightfully, that the only way to stop Hitler was by completely beating him at his own game. During the early years of World War II, Winston Churchill was leading Great Britain into a headlong battle against Adolph Hitler and the Germans. In analyzing his leadership during the years 1940-41 it will be found that Churchill would not succumb to peace treaties, but fought Hitler and the Nazis at their own war. He had to make tough decisions and fight for the freedom, liberty and life of the western societies, and in effect was an important aspect in the out come of the war.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Negotiation and New York

    • 472 Words
    • 17 Pages

    2002.271p. Cohen, Herb,You can Negotiate Anything , Bantam Book . New York, N.Y.1982,255p. Donaldson, Michael C., and Donaldson, Mimi, Negotiating for Dummies, Hungry Minds Inc.,New York, N.Y.,1996, 350 p.…

    • 472 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sir Winston Churchill British statesman, orator, and author who was elected prime minister twice in 1940s and 1950s. He is regarded as one of the finest military leaders in history and is credited to rallying the moral of the British people during world war two and leading them from the brink of defeat to victory against the axis powers. How he did this was not only though his leadership but arguably through his speeches as well, one of Churchill’s greatest assets was his words and how he used them to inspire and motivate his people. Despite having a lisp throughout his career He was known for his excellent speaking, the speeches he made throughout his life in particularly dark times for the British were always inspiring, while presented in a way that made them understandable to any person no matter whom they were. Now this was seen particularly in Churchill’s speech “the defence of freedom and peace” which he presented in October 16th 1938 near the start of world war two in an appeal to British and Americna public to prepare for the strong possibility of war against Nazi Germany. In the speech the defence of freedom and peace Churchill uses a variety of persuasive yet simple literary devices such as allusion, rhetorical questions, imagery and Tricolon and wording to arouse, influence and encourage American and British listeners to ready themselves for a possible war against Germany.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Always have options when going into any negotiation table. Also define the threshold of what is tolerable or what concessions you would be willing to give.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays