Preview

Asx Announcement In Nsklia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
234 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Asx Announcement In Nsklia
This case was operated in 3 different court:
Supreme Court of NSW Decision
The proceedings was brought by ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) to against the director of JHIL for breach of the sections 180 (1) of the corporate act. According to allegations, each of director or officers of a corporation who failed to perform proper care and diligence about to release of announcement to the share market, breached the duties to the company.
The Supreme Court of NSW held that the draft of ASX announcement was approved by the board of JHIL according the evidence provide by the ASIC which is the minutes recorded the tabling and approval of ASX announcement.
The ASX announcement was delivering that there have sufficient funds to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: ABC Nonprofit Legal Toolkit
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Study: ABC Nonprofit Legal Toolkit

    The resolutions below were legally adopted on the above-referenced date of the meeting of the Board…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct 504 Case Study 2
    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Acct 504 Case Study 2

    In a meeting last week, the president of LJB expressed interest of going public in the near future and asked us about the internal control requirements for such action. To become publicly listed, LJB must follow the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which requires all US publicly traded companies to maintain an adequate system of internal control. Under SOX Section 404, a company must report on internal controls over financial reporting in its annual report. Four key elements must be included in this report (Smith, Ledyard;):…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Acct 504 Case Study 2
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Acct 504 Case Study 2

    The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act stresses importance upon guidelines of necessary internal controls for any publicly traded company or corporation. There are several practices LJB Company currently have in place, these will be addressed and should be continued. Finally, steps designed to strengthen the fiscal future of LJB Company and continued growth.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Legt 2741 Assignment
    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Legt 2741 Assignment

    Firstly it must be emphasised that through incorporation J is a separate legal entity from its founder, shareholders and directors as demonstrated in the landmark case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd . Lord Halsbury LC made the judgement that once a company is legally incorporated it must be treated as a separate legal entity. This important legal principle is accounted for in the Corporations Act 2001 s124(1) which states that “a company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual” .…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Acct 200 Week 2 Individual Assignment
    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Acct 200 Week 2 Individual Assignment

    On winding up, the unsecured creditors contended that the company was not having independent existence as Salomon was the Managing Director of the company and the entire company was merely a sham. Their contention was that the limited firm was only a guise to conceal the real identity of the persons who own. However, it was held that Salomon and Co. Ltd. fulfilled all the requirements of the legislature. Further, it was held that the company cannot be equated with the members comprising it. The company was not the agent of Salomon. It was therefore, treated as a company, distinct and independent corporation. The trial judge made the declaration in favor of the company. Salomon then filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judges and dismissed the appeal. Salomon appealed to the house of lord and then the order was ultimately reserved in order of Salomon.…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Youme
    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Youme

    consequences of contravention of the following statutory provisions in this case and its related penalties imposed against Roberta: 1. Disclosure of interest. If a director contravenes the requirement in s 191 to disclose a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of the company, the court can order the director to pay a fine of up to $1100, or be sent to prison for up to three months, or both: see Schedule 3 to the Corporations Act. court can impose these penalties. 2. Improper use of position or information…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2007 Australian Business Law Research Paper
    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2007 Australian Business Law Research Paper

    These materials are designed for use with 2007 Australian Business Law 26th edition by Paul Latimer. They provide a comparative analysis of the Australian legal position with: • • • • • Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Solution ACC2200
    • 1280 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Solution ACC2200

    9. Vickery Roger and Flood Mary Ann, Australian Business Law – compliance and practice, Pearson Publication, 7thed ,2010…

    • 1280 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct 504 - Case Study Ii - Internal Controll Essay Example
    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Acct 504 - Case Study Ii - Internal Controll Essay Example

    Before the LJB Company decides to go public, they will have to review and understand rules and regulations by Security and exchange commission as directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. According to the report by Securities And Exchange Commission LJB Company will have to adapt to rules requiring companies subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, other than registered investment companies, to include in their annual reports a report of management on the company's internal control over financial reporting (Securities and Exchange Commision, 2002). Under reporting rule, regulations require a…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Breaches and Remedies: Common Law, Equitable Principles, Corporations Act 2001
    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Breaches and Remedies: Common Law, Equitable Principles, Corporations Act 2001

    Breaches of s180-184 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and Breaches of Common Law and Equitable Principles…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Accountability Important
    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is Accountability Important

    U.C.M.J. action under article 15. know knowing the severity of the I have realized that is an…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cl Summary
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cl Summary

    This is an appeal which is against the decision upholding the previous appeal. While the legal issue is that whether UDC who is the appellant in this case had fiduciary relationship with Brian who is the first respondent and whether UDC acted in the breach of its fiduciary duty to Brian.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cadia Case Analysis
    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cadia Case Analysis

    Bibliography: Cadia Holdings Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (2010) 242 CLR 195…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pwc Case Study
    • 23293 Words
    • 94 Pages

    Pwc Case Study

    PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was appointed by the National’s Chief Executive Officer which was ratified by the Principal Board. PwC provided status updates to the National’s Principal Board Risk Committee. The terms of reference were to: investigate the sequence of events and trading activities that led to the losses prepare an analysis of the losses and how they occurred, with an initial focus on foreign currency option transactions entered into on or after 1 October 2003 identify key policies, procedures, systems and control failures within the foreign currency options trading business responsible for the losses investigate whether any customer of the National or other third party incurred a direct or indirect loss as a result of the events. During our investigation we provided periodic updates to the National’s Chief General Counsel, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Board and the Principal Board Risk Committee. We also liaised closely with APRA and from time to time with Australian Federal Police and ASIC. We were not asked to establish the amount of the losses. This task was conducted by management and audited by KPMG. We were…

    • 23293 Words
    • 94 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Insider Trading in India - Regulations
    • 8892 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Insider Trading in India - Regulations

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (1[PROHIBITION OF] INSIDER TRADING) REGULATIONS, 1992 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board, with the previous approval of the Central Government, hereby makes the following regulations, namely:— CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title and commencement. 1. (1) These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (2[Prohibition of] Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. (2) These regulations shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official 3Gazette. Definitions. 2. In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires:— (a) “Act” means the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992); (b) “body corporate” means a body corporate as defined in section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (c) “connected person” means any person who— (i) is a director, as defined in clause (13) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), of a company, or is deemed to be a director of that company by virtue of sub-clause (10) of section 307 of that Act; or (ii) occupies the position as an officer or an employee of the company or holds a position involving a professional or business relationship between himself and the company 4[whether temporary or permanent] and who may reasonably be expected to have an access to unpublished price sensitive information in relation to that company. 5 [Explanation :— For the purpose of clause (c), the words “connected person” shall 6[mean] any person who is a connected person six months prior to an act of insider trading;] (d) “dealing in securities” means an act of 7[subscribing,] buying, selling or agreeing to 8 [subscribe,] buy, sell or deal in any securities by any person either as principal or agent;…

    • 8892 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics