Preview

Analysis Of But No Animal Can Reason Rainsford

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
191 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of But No Animal Can Reason Rainsford
“But no animal can reason.” This one sentence was made by Rainsford and his opinion animals. Rainford’s opinion is saying that animals don’t matter, therefore they don't have emotion, this is opinion since this is what he thinks. Of course, however some other people could think that the sentence can be false. Some people may think, “animals can have a sense, some may some don’t, but training could also fix them.” Untrained animals can attack when they need to or want to, unless of course, they are trained and told to.
Some animals can also tell if there is any danger around them, however Rainsford doesn’t think that. “Those that were trained were at least smart enough to be trained.” Some can’t be trained some people think. Therefore It’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “How Smart are Animals?” the author Dorothy Patent, is informing us about the smart abilities animals really have. Animals are smarter than we think. In the first few paragraphs she tells us that a dog, named Villa saved a young girl, named Andrea, from a massive blizzard the dog rushed to her side and got her to safety. This just tells us that animals really can think and process what’s going on. The story explains the perfections and flaws animals have when it comes to training. In the story a part of it tells us that when animals are performing kind of like dolphins they act as if they are in a play or movie like humans do. Dorothy Patent is basically giving us all the information we need to decide on our own whether not animals…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    polThe author’s argument does not make a cogent case for the relationship between the birth order and the hormone cortisol on rhesus monkeys and humans. While his ideas seem to make sense at first glance, there are various assumptions that weaken the argument. The following paragraphs describe three of the most important issues.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rainsford is uncompassionate, this is seen when he’s talking to Whitney. “‘Don’t talk rot, Whitney.’ Said Rainsford. ‘You’re a big game hunter not a philosopher. Who cares how a jaguar feels’ ”.This shows how he’s uncompassionate because he takes no account for how the animals feel. It’s all about the sport. He is also a very proud person. This is seen when he boasts about his sport, hunting, and how it’s the best sport in the word. Rainsford is also courageous. This is seen when he is not deterred by the superstition that surrounds Ship Trap Island. He could also be perceived as strong when he swims to the shore after he is thrown off the boat. This is…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, Whitney says, “I’d rather think they fear one thing- Fear, the fear of pain, and the fear of death.” At this time in the story Whitney is explaining to Rainsford how animals feel when they are being hunted. Rainsford doubts him and insists animals do not have feelings. He is being very naive about fear and does not think hunting is wrong. His view on fear and hunting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Is Rainsford Clever

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell there is a young hunter named Rainsford who is well known in the hunting community. He falls off a yacht and ends up on an island. There he meets a man with a heart colder than his own, where Rainford becomes the hunted. He undergoes a great internal change on the perspective of human and animal life.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can animals really think? Can they make decisions based on information? For years, scientists have debated these questions. Now many of them believe that some animals have the brain power to understand new situations, make decisions, and plan ahead. many animals adapt their behavior to the challenges they face either under natural conditions or in laboratory experiments. For example, on other parts of Africa chimpanzees select suitable branches from which they break ofg twigs to produce a slender probe, which they carry some distance to poke it into a termite nest and eat the termites clinging to it as it is withdrawn. Apes have also learned to use artificial communication systems to ask for objects and activities they want and to answer simple…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article on September 1st of the Los Angeles Times, Jeremy Rifkin claims animals have the same understanding and concept of emotions we humans have, and that we should treat them as our equals. This idea of his is absurd, and if you really look at it you can see, he is just another animal rights activist trying to get his voice heard.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are aware of what goes on around them and what is occurring to them. In the A Change of Heart about Animals Rifkin states “At the Washington National Zoo, Orangutans given mirrors explore part of their bodies they can't otherwise see, showing a sense of self.” Rifkin addresses an animal is capable of knowing what it's doing. Furthermore Rifkin states “It's commonly believed that other animals have no sense of their mortality and are unable to comprehend the concept of their own death. Animals, it appears, experience grief.” This deals with letting the reader know that no matter the situation an animal is self aware of what is going on around them. Lastly T Casey Brenham states “poor animals, how jealously they guard their bodies, for to us is merely an evening’s meal, but to them it's life itself”. T Casey Brennan pointed out how self aware an animal is to try and protect their own…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, A Change of Heart about Animals, written by Jeremy Rifkin is about how animals are very similar to human beings. Some animals are capable of having emotions and the mental ability to complete tasks as humans can. Rifkin emphasizes how animals should have better treatment due to the lack of compassion and acknowledgment among animals. He uses distinctive types of rhetorical techniques to persuade his audience to agree and feel his pain for these creatures. For instance, Rifkin uses pathos in his writing to get emotional feedback from the reader; he makes the reader feel some sort of guilt or pity for the animals. He also uses examples that have a great deal of credibility; such as using animals that are almost as intelligent as humans and including studies from universities and educational references. Rifkin also makes sure to include companies that supports animal rights that one would never imagine supporting. Lastly, Rifkin uses another technique that would leave the reader questioning their own concerns relating to animal rights.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    rodeo cruelty

    • 1847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    reality the animals only show this behavior because they are terrorized and want to escape the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emotions are not just for humans. Animals have emotions too yet do we dub them human? No, we don’t, even though they too feel anger, sadness, and pain…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are we civilized as people? Or do we think or act like we are civilized? Evidence from the story shows that zaroff considers himself civilized, Rainsford considers Zaroff civilized and Rainsford considers himself civilized.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Nonhuman Animals

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people associate feelings and emotion with only human beings, not with nonhuman animals. Less than 41% of people believe that nonhuman animals have emotions and are capable of displaying and acting on them, similar as to what humans would do (Livescience). There are many signs pointing towards the conclusion that nonhuman animals are also sentient beings. Specifically, scientists said that all vertebrates are in some way sentient beings, ranging from birds to fish, and reptiles to mammals. Animals are able to express their varying emotions through audible sounds, body gestures, and animal-specific stereotypical behaviors.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Mind

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Do animals think? This question has been debated for centuries and no clear answer has yet to be decided. By looking at television, comic books, and children’s literature it would seem that animals do think and act intelligently. The fictional characters are given human movements, behavior, and language. In contrast, science, philosophy, and many other academic fields do not believe animals to think, feel, or behave intelligently. Animals are merely machines that have neither feelings nor conscious thought (Schultz & Schultz, 2008).…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays