Preview

Abortion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
752 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abortion
Abortion

I strongly believe a fetus is not a human until the day he/she is born. Therefore abortion should be legal for the purpose that the mother has all control over the dependent being inside her. The fetus is a parasitic being which is living off the mother so Thomson is right when he says we have no obligation towards the fetus. Although I do not think the fetus is a person, Thomson for argument sake says the fetus is a person. Thomson has this claim to conclude that humans have no duty to keep another human alive, such as in the kidnapping case. Also I agree with the ruling of Roe vs. Wade that the matter is a private issue which the mother has all control over her body and anything inside it. Abortion should be legal solely for the reason that a fetus has the “potential” to be a human therefore not a human yet. This issue is one of the most controversial arguments in the world especially in the Catholic religion. Catholics believe that all life is sacred from conception until natural death, and the taking of innocent human life, whether born or unborn, is morally wrong. Catholics believe that at conception a human is created and if at conception a human is created abortion therefore should be illegal. The church says killing innocent humans is not acceptable or moral in our society today. Also the actuality/potentiality issue works both ways where conception starts the inevitable process where a human will be born. Also the church believes abortion is wrong for the fetus has not committed any crime or has done anything to be killed. The biggest argument for anti-abortion is the fact that it is murder. Why is if a murderer kills a pregnant women he/she is charged with a double murder? If the criminal is charged with a double murder clearly that shows the law considers the fetus a human and abortion should be illegal. Also the fetus is a separate being and abortion allows the mother to act for the fetus. People who say abortion should be legal for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    abortion

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The analysis for experiment four: Stoi 903was conducted by Me (name) and my partner (name). They analysis performed for experiment four: Stoi 903 took place at Texas State University- San Marcos in room 117 of the chemistry building. The concentrations used in the experiment were both .5 M sodium hypochlorite and sodium thiosulfate. The concentrations of the solutions found in the dumpster were calculated to be .806 M (both sodium hypochlorite and sodium thiosulfate as well). This was found by taking the 6.0% (by mass) sodium hypochlorite and multiplying it by 1 gram of solution, 1000 mL and 1 mol NaClO. This result was then divided by the result of 100g of solvent, multiplied by 1 mL of solution and 1L which equals 60g NaClO. 60g was then divided by the molar mass of NaClO (74.44) which equals .806 mol NaClO. The same can be done for sodium thiosulfate which results in the same molarity.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson Handout 1

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The standard argument that Thomson is making I that a fetus is a human from the moment it is conceived. That people say to view how humans are made in which includes the process of conception that is said to be human then it must be true.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomson begins her argument by questioning the validity of the argument proposed by anti-abortion activists. Thomson explains that "most opposition to abortion relies on the premise that the fetus is a human being….from the moment of conception" (153). Thomson thinks this is a premise that is strongly argued for, although she also feels it is argued for "not well" (153). According to Thomson, anti-abortion proponents argue that fetuses are persons, and since all persons have a right to life, fetuses also posses a right to life. Regardless, Thomson argues that one can grant that the fetus is a person from the moment of conception, with a right to life, and still prove that abortion can be morally justified. In order to prove this argument Thomson proposes the example of "the sick violinist."…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, she argues that the fetus are not human beings therefore, we should not worry about if we should be able to kill them. She states that the fetus is genetically human, but she claims that research has shown that a fetus is not morally a human. Genetically human is known as a member of the homo sapiens species and being morally human can be summed up by saying one that gives us traits that make us have moral rights. She compiles a list of attributes that make a human morally human: consciousness, reason, self-motivated activity, communication, and self-awareness (not necessarily all of them). She concludes that because the fetus is not morally a human until around the third trimester, so the fetus is not a human until that point, which makes an abortion acceptable any time before the third trimester, or around twenty or so weeks. However, she doesn’t agree with allowing the individual to have an abortion done after reaching the state where the fetus is morally…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the title makes plain, Thomson asserts that abortion is not impermissible. More exactly, she argues for the conclusion that at times, abortion is permissible; she asserts that there are scenarios in which getting an abortion would be immoral. What is especially innovative is the way in which her argument is constructed by Thomson. She starts the essay by pointing out the argument over abortion seems to numerous individuals to hinge on whether the fetus is a man. Most feel that if we could simply discover the response to that puzzle, the consequences for abortion would be clear; namely, that if fetuses are not individuals then, and that if fetuses are persons afterward abortions should be impermissible abortions must be allowable (Thomson, 1984).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article Thomson starts off by giving antiabortionists the benefit of the doubt that fetuses are human persons. She adds that all persons have the right to life and that it is wrong to kill any person. Also she states that someone's right to life is stronger than another person's autonomy and that the only conflict with a fetuses right to life is a mother's right to autonomy. Thus the premises make abortion impermissible. Then Thomson precedes to attacks the premise that one's right to autonomy can be more important to another's right to life in certain situations. She uses quite an imaginative story to display her point of view. Basically there is a hypothetical situation in which a very famous violinist is dying. Apparently the only way for the violinist to survive is to be "plugged" into a particular woman, in which he could use her kidneys to continue living. The catch is that the Society of Music Lovers kidnapped this woman in the middle of the night in order to obtain the use of her kidneys. She then woke up and found herself connected to an unconscious violinist. This obviously very closely resembles an unwanted pregnancy. It is assumed that the woman unplugging herself is permissible even though it would kill the…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Thomson’s paper “A defense of Abortion,” she argues that abortion is morally permissible in some cases. Within the subject of abortion is the circular argument of if a fetus should be classified, and therefor given the same rights, as a person. One of the common opinions among lawmakers is that a fetus’s classification as a person begins at its viability. Others argue that a fetus is a person at the first sign of brain activity. There is no way to definitive answer so Thomson side steps this by assuming for the sake of argument that a fetus is a person and even such, there are cases where abortion should still be considered morally permissible. Thomson effectively argued or the moral permissibility…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion

    • 7048 Words
    • 29 Pages

    The Wake County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council (JCPC), in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities as set forth in the General Statutes of the State of North Carolina, has completed the activities required to develop this County Plan for FY 2008/2009. The JCPC has identified issues and factors that have an influence and impact upon delinquent youth, atrisk youth, and their families in Wake County. Further, the JCPC has identified strategies and services most likely to reduce/prevent delinquent behavior. JCPC Action Plan: An Action Plan to impact delinquent behavior (included in this document) has been developed. With the goals, measurable objectives and corresponding outcomes, the JCPC proposes to prevent or reduce delinquent behavior in Wake County youth. Priorities for Funding: Through a risk & needs assessment and a resource assessment, the JCPC has determined that the following services are needed to reduce/prevent delinquency in Wake County: Major service gaps identified by the Wake County JCPC…

    • 7048 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Why Is Abortion Wrong

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arguments arise about how morally wrong abortion is. A posted ethics guide on the BBC site debates that killing people is wrong and human life begins at conception therefore the foetus is an innocent human being and killing this foetus is wrong which makes abortion wrong. Whereas, people who support abortion argues that the foetus is not necessarily a ‘person’ with the right to live basing it in relation to a collection of human cells does not have the right to live just because it is of the human species otherwise amputating of a limb is a murder. Another argument is that a pregnant woman has moral rights too which includes the right to ownership of her own body; the right to decide her own future; the right to make decisions without moral or legal intervention by others and the right to life where not aborting the foetus would put the mother’s life or health in danger giving her the moral right to abort the…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Canada has a history with the controversial issue of abortion. The two sides to this topic have strong opinions about the right and wrong decisions when it comes to abortion. One might believe that abortion should not exist in Canadian society. These people are most likely known as pro-life; who believe abortion is equal to murder. Others believe that abortion is a good thing, and has had a strong impact on Canadian society. These people are pro-choice, they believe abortion is a way to help an individual's life for the better. The R.v. Morgentaler case was about two men, including Morgentaler who were licensed physicians, they set up a private clinic providing abortion services to women who did not have the necessary approval and they were criminally charged. The R.v. Morgentaler case made a significant impact on Canadian society; more broadly this case impacted the women of Canada by granting women greater equality rights, giving them a healthier along with a safe lifestyle, and it got rid of illegal acts made by doctors.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every single human life is entitled to human rights. If a foetus is life then it is entitled to its rights also. John Locke (1632 – 1704) held that individuals have certain rights because they are inherent in our nature. The foetus has the right to stay alive and become a baby. However, it is using the mother’s body to grow. Because it is the mother’s body she should have the right to decide what she wants to do with it. If she doesn’t want a human life to be growing inside of her then she shouldn’t have to. It would be against…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a) Compare the ways in which Natural law and Utilitarianism might be applied to abortion. (25 marks)…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Catholic Church Abortion

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To begin with, pro-choice supporters have a different stance on whether an unborn baby is in fact a human. In the article “Should Abortion Be Legal?” it states, “Embryos and fetuses are not independent, self-determining beings, and abortion is the termination of a pregnancy, not a baby. A person's age is calculated from birth date, not conception, and fetuses are not counted in the US Census.” (“Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 8). Contrary to what Catholics believe, those in favour of abortion have the outlook that abortion does not kill a human as they need to further develop. Still dependent on their mother for survival, a fetus is not their own person, rather an embryo in a woman’s womb. With these facts in mind, abortion is not the taking of a human life; therefore, it is not morally wrong. In the eyes of a pro-life activist, one can make the argument that killing an unborn baby is the same as killing a regular human according to God’s teachings. Which can lead them to believe if killing a fetus is acceptable, what is the difference between killing a fully developed person? Furthermore, living in a society where abortion is illegal would ultimately be stripping a woman of their human rights. The article suggests that “The 7-2 decision stated that the Constitution gives ‘a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,’ and that ‘This right of privacy... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.’”( “Should Abortion Be Legal?,” 2017, para. 4). Pro-choice supporters believe that not allowing a woman to choose to conceive or not is in violation of her rights and freedom. If a woman cannot choose how she wants to treat her own body, then she is not in control over herself. Catholic Church followers can argue the point that the unborn baby will not even be able…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion

    • 37160 Words
    • 149 Pages

    Attempts to obtain an abortion are much more difficult for minors than for their adult counterparts due in part to laws and restrictions that regulate the consent and notification of a minor's parents. Thirty-four states require some form of parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion. The laws are intended to foster parent-child relationships, protect the rights of parents, and deter young women from obtaining abortions or becoming pregnant in the first place, but research casts doubt on whether the laws have their intended effect, and Supreme Court rulings allow minors some privacy rights regarding obtaining an abortion.…

    • 37160 Words
    • 149 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title is somewhat misleading because it's not a complete defense of Abortion it's more of a minimal defense. In Thomson's essay, she states that Abortion is not necessarily morally impermissible which means that there are times when it is permissible and there are times when it is not. She begins the essay by pointing out that people debate on whether or not a fetus is a person. Many people feel that If we had an answer to that then that would make things a whole lot simpler and we would know that if a fetus was a person then it would be morally impermissible to go forth with an abortion and if the fetus wasn't a person that it would be morally permissible to have an abortion. For the sake of argument, she goes on to say that a fetus is a person and even though that may be the case there are still many scenarios in which abortion is morally permissible.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics