1. What role do mobile phones play in society? Discuss the influence of technology on everyday life: relationships, social movements and education. Mobile phones have a major impact on modern society as they are increasingly useful social tools. In 2004, ‘there were almost two billion mobile subscribers world-wide’ Arminen 2007. The majority of worldwide businesses use this technology to communicate. Mobiles have changed the way people organise activities, meetings and social occasions, and generally the way people go about living everyday life. Mobile phones increase contact with peers, so a person can always know what’s going on with those close to them. They help people communicate more efficiently, anywhere on the planet. Mobile phones have developed multi-features they are more than just a phone and can be used for sending text messages, taking photos, surfing the internet, playing music, using a calculator, setting an alarm, playing games, sending email, checking the time, calendar, maps, GPS, banking, radio, business’s such as voice memos, and are capable of an amazing amount of functions and some have many more functions than a computer, have the added bonus of high portability. On the down side however mobile phones can break down personal barriers where a person can find it hard to have any personal time, or participate fully in their present environment without interruptions as the majority of people never turn off their phone, so there is always constant communication. Modern day society has formed a very strong reliance on mobile phones where most individuals cannot leave home without their mobiles and have developed a need to be constantly contacted. Overall mobiles have a very large influence on relationships.
Mobile phones play a huge role specifically in adolescences relationships. Mobile phone technology allows us to communicate with social groups in new ways, and to reaffirm those relationships, regardless of distance. SMS connects...
References: Arminen, I, 2007, ‘Review Essay, Mobile Communication Society?’, Mobile Communication Society?, v.53, no.1 University of Tampere viewed 19 March 2010 http://asj.sagepub.com
Cogmed, 1999 Karolinska Institute, viewed 6 April 2010, http://www.cogmed.com/
Cupples, J & Thompson, L, 2010, 'Heterotextuality and Digital Foreplay ', Feminist Media
Studies, v.10, no.1, pp.1-17, Ebscohost viewed 19 March 2010 http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a919196107
Geser, H, 2004, ‘Towards a Sociological Theory of the Mobile Phone’, ‘Sociology in Switzerland: Sociology of the Mobile Phone’, Google Scholar viewed 16 March 2010 http://socio.ch/mobile/t_geser1.pdf
Horstmanshof, L, & Power, MR, 2005, ‘Mobile phones, SMS, and relationships’, Humanities & Social Sciences papers, v.32, no.1, pp. 33-52, Bond University viewed 16 March 2010 http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/75/
Snooks and Co 2002, Style manual for authors, editors and printers, 6th edn, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Qld. Published 2010
Please join StudyMode to read the full document