Hamiltons Economic plan- - believed in the torries
-lead to more support from
-assumption of all the debts of the states
-national bank/ excise tax
Results of the war of 1812
- Nationalism (anthem)
-New Respect from other nations
-Nationalism
-Growth of Factories in the U.S
- It ended the Federalist party
-Threatened Succession
Missouri Compromise
-Main becomes free state/ Missouri becomes slave state
- Draw line at the 36th parallel (north of this line slavery would be prohibited) this was a temporary solution
XYZ affair
-France demanded a bribe from U.S in order to speak with the Minister
-Federalists clamored for war
Debate over national bank-
-Jeffersonian’s and Democratic republicans opposed it because they were strict constructionists ( they followed the constitution very strictly)
-Hamilton supported it because he was a loose constructionist
- Washington used the elastic clause as a reason to approve the bank
Elastic clause
“ if it is necessary and proper for a government to carry out its delegated powers then it is allowed”
Washington’s Farewell Address
-Warned against political powers
-Warns against permanent alliance
Alien and Sedition acts
-Raised residency requirements from 4 years- 14 years
- made it a crime to speak out against government
Why were the acts passed? -The federalists wanted to reduce the power of the democratic republicans
What was the vice president under Washington? - John Adams
What was the vice president under Adams? - Thomas Jefferson
What was the vice president under Jefferson? - Aarron Burr
Louisiana Purchase?
Was the Louisiana territory purchased from France for 15 million
-Doubled the size of the united states
- as a strict constructionist Jefferson had reservations
- used the treaty making powers of a president to justify his decision
Causes of war of 1812
1) British impressment of sailors + seizing American ships
-British were selling arms to Indians
- War Hawks wanted expansion and to take Canada
Battle of New Orleans
-Andrew Jackson leads Americans to victory and becomes war hero
- 2 weeks after war of 1812 ended
-Restored the honor of the US
- Nationalism Increased
Clays American System
-wanted a protective tariff on imports
-wants revenue/ renew the national bank
- plans to spend money on roads, canals and infrastructure
GOAL: to boost national economy
Monroe Doctrine
-Declares an end to colonization in western hemisphere
- Promises that United Sates wont to interfere on European conflicts
McCulloch vs. Maryland
-Maryland was suing Marshall because he would let Maryland tax the national bank
-Marshall ruled that the tax was not constitutional
-Also ruled that the bank was constitutional
-> National/ federal laws are higher then state laws and states cant interfere with national laws
Hartford Convention
-Where federalists met and discussed succession ( they opposed the war)
-They demanded compensation since their economy relied on trade the war had hurt their economy
Marbury v.s Madison
- 1st judicial review is used, the supreme court determines weather or not a law is constitutional
-judicial act (declared it unconstitutional )
Federalist polices
-wanted a strong national government
-wanted a loose interpretation of the constitution
- favor British and the wealthy/educated
Republican Policies
-wanted a strong state government
-wanted a strict interpretation of the government
-were Pro French
-supported farmers and common people
Assumption of debts
- In Hamilton’s economic plan all the debts of the states on the US were assumed and paid off
Rush Bagot Agreement
- happened in 1817 Monroe’s 1s t year in office
- the US and Great Britain agreed to limit naval ships on the great lakes
-the first time that Great Britain
Pinckney’s Treaty
-established intentions of friendship between the United States and Spain.
- It also defined the boundaries of the United States with the Spanish colonies and guaranteed the United States navigation rights on the Mississippi River.
Jay’s Treaty
-The British agreed to vacate the six western forts by June 1796
- also agreed to compensate American ship owners
-In return, the United States gave most favored nation trading status to Britain
Whiskey Rebellion (1794)
-Excise tax hurt the whiskey farmers on the frontier since they distilled the rye into whiskey
-farmers in western Pennsylvania refused to pay the tax
-they raised the cry “ no taxation without representation”
-They would tar/revenue the officers
What was done to stop it?
-Washington and Hamilton lead an army of 13,000 men and the rebels either dispersed or were captured only 3 were killed What did the rebellion lead to?
It led to increased respect for the national government
Strict construction- written in text is followed and interpreted very strictly, Once the court has a clear meaning of the text, no further investigation is required
Embargo Act
-forbade export of U.S goods
-resulted in economic depression and smuggling
-TJ supported seizing cargo without warrant
-repealed in 1809 + replaced with Non intercourse Act = reopened trade, except with Britain and France
- led to the opening of more factories
Gibbons vs. Ogden
-NY state granted monopoly to Robert Fulton
-Gibbons was operating the steamboat what a federal license
-Ogden was operating his steamboat with a state license
Decision
1)Marshall declared that any government had the right to regulate interstate commerce
Impact
1) Increased power of National Government
2) Any commerce that crosses state lines is controlled by national government
Treaty of Ghent (1814)
1) Both sides were eager for peace
2)Armistice- both sides agreed to stop fighting and the war ended in a draw
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The bill was closed to amendments and most Republicans supported the bill. However, it was not clear if there would be enough votes to ensure passage of the bill.…
- 460 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase is seen as a loose construction conclusion. Since the constitution does not state that the president can buy foreign land, Jefferson was not following the constitution when he made this decision. Jefferson submitted the agreement with France to the senate and after the republican majority ratified the purchase, the Louisiana territory was officially the United States. Jefferson's decision to buy the Louisiana Purchase benefitted the United States…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Why was the United States Navy able to have success in the fight for Canada?…
- 415 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This was considered broad constructionalism because normally Jeffersonians would try to limit military spending and expansion of their military, yet the decision to go to war was not changed. Most did not agree with the war, but it was most unpopular in New England where citizens were extremely dependent on trade.The Constitution stated that 2/3 must support the war before it can be declared but Jefferson believed he had the final decision (E). Federalists complained that the Consitution did not state anything about enforcing a draft, and that it would be similar to creating a dictator (D). Another way in which Federalists began to exhibit strict behaviors was by setting up the Hartford Convention. This showed that they were trying to secede from the war against Britain, but began the downfall of the Federalist party due to their disloyalty. All of these things show how each party gradually switched their views on the Constitutions…
- 570 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There was a definite divide between supporters and opponents. The opponents did not reject the Articles. Many opponents feared that the Constitution is undemocratic and that it could be very oppressive overall. There were controversies about the Constitution and how it failed to address…
- 390 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Following the making of the Constitution, James Madison brought forth the warning of political factions or parties as we know today in one of his many inputs into the Federalist Papers. As the Constitution was offered among the states to be ratified, two groups rose in effect of differing opinions on the document, and these two groups were known as the supporters, Federalists, and the opposition, Antifederalists. After eventual political compromise and the beginning of a new government, these parties did not disappear, yet instead became much stronger. In one corner stood the Federalists who believed in broad constructionism of the Constitution and used it to enlarge the size of the national government and its’ powers. In the other corner stood the Antifederalists who soon became the Democratic-Republicans, and in opposition to the Federalist believed in a strict constructionism of the Constitution and often supporting the power of the state and its’ independence.…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Since raising revenue in the United States was one of the first economic issues the Federalists were up against, a solution to national debt had to be found and agreed upon. During the Federalist’s struggle, James Madison was a federalist who was also known for being Hamilton’s close ally. He imposed taxes to control the government and to simultaneously raise revenues. At first, the taxing started off rather small, but then quickly grew into more expensive taxes. Madison believed that raising revenues would be better for the economy. The amount of taxes developed depended on the basis of a ship. If the Americans built the ship then they would pay a small amount; if foreign companies built the ship, then they would pay a greater tax than the Americans. The federalists also believed that the idea of a national bank could be plausible because of a line in the Constitution stating that anything that would benefit the country could be formed by the central government. However, since the national bank was still up for debate, the Federalists saw the Constitution as guidelines as a way of enforcing their idea. Although the Republicans only saw a national bank as a way of giving too much power to the central government, the idea of a national bank was to make the states less dependent on imported manufactured goods.…
- 803 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This decade was internal crisis. The Federalist disagreed with the Republicans ideas to attach with France. The leader of the Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, thought that the United States should model our government after Britain's government, as stated in document D. Thomas Jefferson disagree with this idea because he believed that Britain was not Republican in if we used your form a government we would lose our republican believe (document E).…
- 316 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
the tax. Resistance came to a climax in July 1794, when a U.S. marshal arrived in western…
- 995 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Through the development and drafting of the constitution, two political parties were born. One labeled as strict constructionists, the Jeffersonian Republicans, and the other labeled as broad constructionists, the Federalists. The Democratic-Republicans such as Thomas Jefferson, were first labeled as anti-federalists and believed the states should have the most power in the government and most vowed not to sign the constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. They believed that if a power was not specifically stated in the constitution, then it could not be acted upon. The Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that they could exercise whichever powers on the basis that, even if a power was not physically stated, it could be interpreted from the specified powers. During the presidencies of Washington and Adams these characterizations of the two parties remained evident, but during the presidencies of Republicans, such as Jefferson and Madison, the line between strict and broad constructionism became a little more unclear. After the election of 1800 both the Federalist and Democratic-Republican party began to back down on their views of constructionism when faced with the task of deciding what would benefit the nation most.…
- 1427 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
While the Federalist were in favor of ratifying the Constitution because they wanted a strong central…
- 261 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
government, it has been said, are delegated by the states, who alone are truly sovereign”…
- 952 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…
- 1062 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…
- 1711 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays