Following is an income statement calculated based on the different equity theories of accounting. Entity Theory Proprietary Theory Orthodox Unorthodox Residual Equity Theory Revenues $ 1‚000‚000 $ 1‚000‚000 $ 1‚000‚000 $ 1‚000‚000 Less: Operating Expenses Cost of goods sold $400‚000 $400‚000 $400‚000 $400‚000 Depreciation $100‚000 $100‚000 $100‚000 $100‚000 Salaries and Wages $200‚000 $200‚000 $200‚000 $200‚000
Premium Preferred stock Stock market Revenue
Compare and contrast normative and positive accounting approaches: Definition of PAT: Watts and Zimmerman (1986) defined Pat as a theory that seeks to explain and predicts particular phenomenon. It is concerned with explaining accounting practice. The three basic hypotheses as outlined by Watts and Zimmerman (1978) underlying PAT are: 1. Bonus plan hypothesis: The bonus plan hypothesis is that managers of firms with bonus plans are more likely to use accounting methods that increase current period reported
Premium Scientific method Theory Research
Module 1: Accounting under ideal conditions Ideal conditions; certainty and uncertainty (including differences & similarities)‚ dividend irrelevancy‚ arbitrage‚ accretion of discount‚ abnormal earnings RRA - SFAS69; weaknesses of RRA (relevant but not as reliable) Historical Accounting Revisited mixed measurement model‚ (relatively reliable but lacks relevance)‚ revenue recognition‚ recognition lag Relevance VS Reliability -> tradeoffs (Without ideal conditions‚ complete relevance &
Premium Economics Risk Risk aversion
Faculty of Commerce Faculty of Commerce - Accounting & Finance Working Papers University of Wollongong Year The Critique of Accounting Theory M. Gaffikin University of Wollongong‚ gaffikin@uow.edu.au This working paper was originally published as Gaffikin‚ M‚ The Critique of Accounting Theory‚ Accounting & Finance Working Paper 06/25‚ School of Accounting & Finance‚ University of Wollongong‚ 2006. This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/accfinwp/41 06/25 University
Free Sociology Social sciences
Accounting Standards Board University of Phoenix Accounting Theory and Research Jun 13‚ 2009 Accounting Standards Board To address the increasing challenges of legislating those governs our society today‚ “countries all over the world have begun to outsource rulemaking to bodies consisting of people familiar with the subject. For that reason‚ policymakers rely on private entities to establish financial accounting and reporting standards” (Donald Kieso‚ 2003‚ Intermediate Accounting). The
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Income statement
DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING THEORY IN MALAYSIA LECTURER: DR. ROSMILA SENIK GROUP MEMBERS: AHMAD SABRI IZZAT BIN RAMLI 134918 ROSMALINDA BT ISMAIL 135047 MOHD SHUKRY BIN MD TAIB 134820 ILY IRYANI ISTIHAR 135272 Introduction Studies of accounting development in Malaysia more focus on the politics of
Premium Malaysia Economics Accountant
Summary 1 Introduction 2 Theories of Accounting 2 Public Interest Theory 2 Private Interest Theory 2 Regulatory Capture Theory 3 Is accounting Needed (GPFR)? 3 What does the financial department (accounts) do? 3 Why public disclosure became so serious? 4 Principal Agent Outlook 4 Agency Cost- Critical Reason for accounting frauds 6 Three Essential Accounting Areas 7 Capital Budgeting 7 Investments 9 Capital Structure 11 Trade off theory 12 Conclusion 13 References:
Premium Finance Corporate finance Investment
Accounting Theory Questions 1. what is positive accounting theory? how does it differ from normative accounting theory? what was/were the major dissatisfaction(s) with normative accounting theory which led to the development of a positive theory accounting? 2. Explain the meaning of an efficient market. what is meant by the following terms: weak-form efficiency‚ semistrong-form efficiency‚ strong-form efficiency? which form is the most important to accounting research? why? 3 Explain the important
Premium Scientific method Stock market
Introduction WorldCom was America ’s second largest telecom company in 2000 (The WorldCom Accounting Scandal‚ 2002). Making a modest beginning in the hinterland of Mississippi in 1983 with a meager capital of less than 100‚000 USD it reached the pinnacle of corporate success reporting more than USD 39 billion in revenue and USD 150 million in MCAP (The WorldCom Accounting Scandal‚ 2002). In the process it became 42nd in the Fortune 500 list. Under the leadership of CEO Bernie Ebbers it grew rapidly
Premium Corporate governance Management Accounting scandals
Casey Noble 15 October 2008 Sabo SWOT Analysis WorldCom WorldCom‚ formerly known as the second largest long distance phone service‚ had taken its fall and officially took its final name on April 14‚ 2003. This Company’s mission statement was to “Create a competitive advantage for WorldCom and contribute significantly to WorldCom’s business success by promoting business practices that provide greater opportunity for a diverse supplier base." Throughout WorldCom’s lively years‚ it had great
Premium Corporate governance Verizon Communications