"What are the charges against socrates as recorded in the apology is he guilty of them why or why not" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates made his defenses against accuses in the dialogue of Apology. In his own way‚ he organizes his statements together in the first two sentences of the dialogue. He expresses his opinions through the sentences; He shows his attitudes towards to the jury men; He also introduced that he would state how the accusers affected the jury men in a negative way. Socrates introduced his first topic by his first sentence‚ “I do not know‚” . Socrates was the wisest man in ancient Greece at that time

    Premium Plato Socrates Apology

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    received a not guilty verdict and was let free. I believe that O.J. Simpson’s verdict should have been guilty because of the evidence on the scene‚ because of his book that was later published‚ and because of his 3 or 4 changes in alibi for the time of the murders. On June 12‚ 1994 Nicole Brown saw the sunrise for the last time. Nicole and Ronald Goldman‚ Nicole’s close friend‚ were killed outside Nicole’s house on 875 South Bundy Drive. Both of them being stabbed to death‚ and

    Premium O. J. Simpson murder case Nicole Brown Simpson Capital punishment

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Socrates Unjust

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires‚ to avoid self indulgence in evil desires‚ and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem. Socrates uses

    Premium

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    the false accusations in the ApologySocrates is imprisoned for being wrongly tried and condemned to death‚ later on he is greeted by Crito his friend who visits in the cell with him. Crito tries to convince him through compelling‚ but at times selfish arguments. Socrates responds against these arguments with selfless reasons to explain the bigger issue of his own principles. Firstly‚ Crito argues minor and major points of logic on why it is right to escape‚ but Socrates does not escape based on his

    Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s the Apology we hear his account of Socrates trial where he is accused with corrupting the youth and not believing in the Gods. The trial accounts open with Socrates claiming that his accusers have spoken persuasively but not truthfully on the matters. He states that he has had no previous experience with speaking in courts of law and asks for patience. Socrates starts with his anecdote on how his friend had gone to the Oracle of Delphi and asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates and the prophet

    Premium Plato Socrates Philosophy

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    be adjusted. Socrates in Plato’s Crito makes it a point that a good citizen follows the government of the place that raised them. His claim on why he fought for his right to go unpunished in Plato’s Apology is that he was hoping to create a change in the government‚ and this is a thoughtful favor for him to do because it is important that the members of a state are involved in politics and the government. Socrates was happy living where he was for about seventy years‚ so why would he be mad at the

    Premium Plato Philosophy Political philosophy

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Friar Lawrence is guilty because he does multiple mistakes that proves him guilty ‚ and here are his three strikes. Friar Lawrence is guilty‚ but in another article I read‚ I do hear a lot of other opinions‚ but this is what I think about the book. The first thing Friar Lawrence did wrong was he trusted Juliet to take the potion‚ plus she was a minor. Juliet was willing to do anyway‚ and he let her know not to sell to a person to her age‚ and he does it anyway for asking for the poison. “She

    Premium Characters in Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet Juliet Capulet

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    everything. If Socrates were here today he would repeat what he said to Athenians 2‚400 years ago‚ that we know nothing. After Socrates encountered the Oracle of Delphi‚ which told him he was the wisest man in Athens‚ he went on a journey to try to disprove the oracle. He did this by asking politicians‚ poets and craftsmen questions. He knew that he didn’t know everything and along the way‚ he realized that the public didn’t know more than he did‚ just that they thought they did. He concluded that he knew

    Premium Mind Plato Thought

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Socrates makes the claim that “a good man cannot be harmed in life or in death‚” he does not mean this literally. Quite simply‚ any living creature on Earth is capable of being harmed‚ physically‚ mentally‚ or emotionally‚ and humans are of no exception to this. Rather‚ Socrates is stating that a man who lives with good‚ true intentions‚ and follows the moral conduct accepted by the greater of society‚ will not have his reputation‚ public image‚ or morality tainted‚ despite any attempt of others

    Premium Plato Philosophy Socrates

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As magistrate for the trial of Augustus‚ I heard many interesting and compelling arguments that challenged my final decision. The case was brought to determine whether Augustus was guilty of murder in the first degree or of high treason against the Roman republic. I assessed the different arguments by looking through my detailed notes. In addition‚ I reflected upon and analyzed the points that were made by the witnesses and questions asked by the lawyers during the trial. In the end‚ the testimonies

    Premium Jury Law Plato

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50