Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Your initial post should be at least 150 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. When responding to your classmates‚ consider why the sound deductive argument might be seen by some as being valid but not sound. Pistachios are very addictive‚ Mike eats a lot of pistachio ice cream because
Premium Inductive reasoning Logic Deductive reasoning
Right vs. Wrong In Plato’s Republic‚ Book 1‚ various interlocutors make arguments on the definition of justice. Cephalus proposes the definition of justice as “speaking the truth and paying whatever debts one has incurred” (Plato‚ 331c). I will prove Cephalus’ argument true by analyzing the structure and his use of examples‚ discussing possible errors in his reasoning and finally rebutting those who disagree. Justice is knowing right versus wrong and acting on that understanding. Cephalus begins
Premium Justice Logic Ethics
Analyzing‚ Interpreting‚ and Assessing Visual Art • Describe the artwork in terms of the six elements of visual design: line‚ space‚ light and color‚ texture‚ pattern‚ and time and motion. Focus on the elements that are most relevant to your selected work of art. A line is a path left by a moving point. There are four main functions of a line‚ they are: to outline a shape; to create movement or emphasis; to develop pattern and texture‚ and also to shade and model using techniques such as hatching
Premium Art Color Arts
Recognizing Arguments In this assignment‚ you will apply key concepts covered in the module readings. You will identify the component parts of arguments and differentiate between various types of arguments such as strict‚ loose‚ inductive‚ and deductive. You will then construct specific‚ original arguments. There are two parts to the assignment. Complete both parts. Part 1 1a: Identify Components of Arguments Identify the component parts of the argument‚ premises and conclusion‚ for
Premium Logic Argument Fallacy
Socrates: Creating Elaborate Arguments Socrates in his defense of the accusations brought onto him‚ argues on several different topics that disprove any accusations that Meletus brought to the trial. His approach at defending himself through arguments was a bold move‚ and as we know from reading the text‚ the jury still finds him guilty regardless of this strategy that backfired on him. One argument that stuck out was how he did not corrupt the youth‚ but if he did it was unknowingly‚ which does
Premium Argument Logic
Mapping an Argument The first article chosen was Abortion Is a Form of Genocide by Meredith Eugene Hunt. The issue in this article is “abortion as a form of genocide is accurate by historical and accepted standards of the word’s definition” (Abortion‚ 2010). I highlighted this as the issue because it includes everything the author is trying to prove to the reader. Hunt wants to make it known that she believes abortion is a form of genocide even though the parameters fit loosely. She also points
Premium Logic Deductive reasoning Argument
Fallacious Arguments in the Declaration of Independence The Declaration of Independence is among the most profoundly interpreted and fiercely discussed documents in modern history. Most likely because of its rhetorical style and numerous fallacious arguments that are found. The colonists’ use of persuasion to influence by using repetition to achieve their means. The Declaration of Independence is what 56 colonists saw as a logical course of action. What you must ask yourself is: What was considered
Premium Fallacy United States Declaration of Independence Rhetoric
1. Fallacious Arguments Considering the fallacies discussed in Chapter Four of An Introduction to Logic‚ construct three different arguments that display distinct fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in drawing the conclusion it does. Review your classmates’ examples and see if they‚ in fact‚ commit the fallacy identified. Before getting to examples of different arguments that display distinct fallacies I will define a fallacious argument. In our text fallacy is defined
Premium Critical thinking Logic Argumentation theory
Gibson and walk (1960) investigated depth perception in human infants. The used a piece of equipment called “The visual cliff”. The visual cliff was used to give the impression of depth. Gibson tested 36 babies between the ages of 6 months – 14 months. They placed them individually on one side of the apparatus and got their mothers to encourage them to cross the apparent cliff edge. This was done to see if the infants had an innate awareness of depth. The found that babies would happily crawl across
Premium Cognition Visual perception Psychology
The cosmological arguments are inductive arguments based on an ‘a posteriori’ premise‚ which‚ despite having been introduced many years ago‚ continue to be prevalent today. An early example of the argument is within ‘Timaeus’‚ in which Plato proposed the idea that anything that has been created must be created by a cause. These arguments are intended to prove the existence of the God of Classical Theism by explaining that God must be the first cause of the universe; the being setting the world into
Premium Existence Cosmological argument Metaphysics