LGST101: Business Law AY 2011-2012‚ Term 1 Group 8 Project Written Analysis Tort of Negligence Prepared for: Professor Melvyn Chew Written By: Jamie Lim Jia Qi (#12) Joel Koh Yong Kiat (#14) Low Hwan Hong (#23) Oh Zhan Yuan (#24) Ong Hui Ming Maria Nicolette (#25) G12 Throughout the course of this report‚ to determine if the plaintiff is owed a duty of care in negligence‚ we will adhere by the Singapore single test of negligence laid out in the case of Spandeck Engineering
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
Tort of negligence Legal obligation on persons to exercise reasonable care not to cause harm to others in specified circumstances. In order to establish liability for the Tort‚ the victim has to show: 1. He is owned a duty of care by the tortfeasor; 2. The tortfeasor has beached that duty of care AND 3. The victim has suffered resulting damage Duty of care: The “Neighbor Principle” to establish whether or not a duty of care is owed in the context of the Tort of negligence. First one has to establish
Premium Contract Tort
Case Study Vicarious Liability Introduction Under the English Common Law‚ Vicarious liability is a principle of the tort laws. The law imposes liability of employees and agents to their employers. Under this law‚ the liability of any tort committed by an employee that falls under the scope of his duties to the employer is transferred to the employer. This includes both the intentional and unintentional torts. The inclusion of the intentional torts came in to effect after the ruling in the case
Premium Management Strategic management Organization
Law of Tort Ian Yeats Paula Giliker Mary Luckham 2005 LLB BSc Accounting with Law / Law with Accounting BSc Management with Law / Law with Management 2660001 2770201 2770201 This subject guide was prepared for the University of London External Programme by: Ian Yeats‚ MA (Aberdeen)‚ BCL‚ MA (Oxford)‚ Barrister‚ Senior Lecturer in Law‚ Queen Mary College‚ University of London. Paula Giliker‚ MA (Oxon)‚ BCL‚ PhD (Cantab)‚ Barrister at Law‚ Fellow and Senior Law Tutor‚ St Hilda’s College
Premium Tort Common law Law
A2 law: tort: Vicarious Liability Question 2-Fairness/Unfairness. Vicarious liability arises when one party is responsible for the tort of another. This situation occurs frequently when an employer is held responsible for the torts committed by an employee. An employer can only be held responsible for the torts of an employee‚ not for an independent contractor. There are also some rules that must be satisfied. First it must be proven that the tortfeaser is an employee. The act the tortfeaser
Premium Employment Tort law Strict liability
land‚ or some right over or in connection with is nuisance (Winfield and Jolowich on tort) examples are noise‚ fumes‚ dust e.t.c. There are 3 different actions in nuisance but the ones of concern are private‚ public and Rylands and Fletcher (strict liability).the objective of nuisance is to protect an individual’s interest in land. The scenario to be analysed below is to advise Banger of his potential liability in tort since the occupier/ controller of the land (country house)‚ and the creator of the
Premium Tort
TORTS – Fall 2006 “G” = something that Goldwasser said in class 01. INTRODUCTION TO TORT LAW (p.2) • set of rules regarding liability and compensation for personal injury‚ death‚ and property damage that one party causes to another - rules for shifting losses from injured victims to the persons and companies causing injuries • grew out of a focus on bodily injury and physical property damage - now extended to include harm to reputation‚ privacy‚ emotional well-being‚ and economic losses
Premium Tort Jury Common law
Torts Outline Exam Analysis Chart out all of the torts that are in the fact pattern. Who are the plaintiffs and defendants? Make the prima facie case. Raise the defenses to the prima facie case. General considerations‚ if any. Vicarious liability Joint tortfeasors Intentional Torts – Attacking the fact pattern Always treat the plaintiff as an average person (no super sensitivities except when D is aware of them.) Everyone is liable for an intentional tort! 1 Torts Outline 1) Introduction
Premium Tort law Tort
the guidance of Dr. Chandrashekhar J. Rawandale Director Symbiosis Law School‚ Noida C E R T I F I C A T E The project entitled “Consumer‚ Medical Profession and Negligence: Analysis“ submitted to the Symbiosis Law School‚ NOIDA for Law of Torts‚ MV Accident and Consumer Protection Laws-II as part of Internal assessment is based on my original work carried out under the guidance of Dr.Chandrashekhar J. Rawandale from December to February. The research work has not been submitted elsewhere
Premium Medicine Negligence Duty of care
Chapter 18: Remedies for Breach of Contract Election to discharge: self-help remedy Types of Judicial Remedies • Common law remedy of damages • Common law remedy of an action for a fixed sum • Equitable remedy of specific performance • Equitable remedy of injunction Limitation Act • Judicial remedies may be barred by lapse of time due to LA • S 6 LA: no action against breach of contract after 6 years have passed (unless party unaware of breach) • LA does not apply to any legal action rooted
Premium Contract Breach of contract Contract law