days of trial‚ now the jury needs to decide whether this eighteen-year-old boy is the murderer of his father. It is a hot afternoon‚ and 12 men are locked in the jury room to discuss the case. In the first vote‚ 11 men think the boy is guilty; only one doesn’t vote guilty simply because he thinks it is too soon to make this decision. The other men get angry about his words and try to show the evidence to persuade him: the noise heard by the old man living under stairs‚ the crime motive‚ the murdering
Premium Jury
Introduction 12 Angry Men is a good example of group and individual behavior. It clearly illustrates the pressure of conformity and groupthink. A group can be defined as two or more individuals‚ interacting and interdependent‚ who come together to achieve a particular objective. In the movie 12 Jurors come together with the sole obligation of concluding if the young man was guilty of murdering his father or not‚ beyond reasonable doubt. This group of 12 men who did not know each other walked
Premium Jury Not proven Critical thinking
Camilla Santandrea Professor Sandra Hurtes Literature in the Modern World 26 November 2012 12 Angry Men directed by Sidney Lumet: Justice System Twelve Angry Men is a movie set in a jury deliberation room where the twelve male members of jury meet to decide upon the innocence or guilt of a young man accused of stabbing his abusive father to death. A unanimous vote is necessary to either convict or acquit the accused. Initially‚ eleven of the jury members decide upon a guilty verdict and
Premium Jury
"12 Angry Men" is a remake of the 1957 Black-and-white film‚ and tells the story of twelve jurors bound by the acceptance of their civic duty and thrust together into a hot‚ humid room to determine the guilt or innocence of a boy accused of killing his father in a moment of rage. Only one juror is not certain‚ beyond a reasonable doubt‚ that the young man is guilty. With the exception of a few moments at the beginning and the end‚ the entire movie takes place in the room. All in all‚ I thought
Premium Jury
It is a matter of life and death and it is all up to twelve people. According to Johnnie Cochran “If it doesn’t make sense‚ you should find for the defense.” If the facts that are presented by the prosecution are not clear then the jury should vote the defendant not guilty. One may disagree with this statement because if the evidence that is presented in court is unclear‚ and then the jury grants the defendant not guilty and the defendant really did commit the crime then there is a criminal on the
Premium Jury
Sidney Lumet‚ director of 12 Angry Men‚ did a phenomenal job expressing the depiction of an adaptation of the theatre production. A 12- man jury are sent into a room to discuss the topics laid out in court‚ referring to a young‚ Puerto Rican‚ man supposedly killing his father. The defendant’s alibi is weak‚ and the murder weapon was found at the scene. Several witnesses have seen the defendant fleeing the scene. On this excruciating hot day‚ the men begin laying down the law‚ and looking at the evidence
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
in twelve angry men are influenced by their past experiences. I think that most of them do but the handfuls of jurors choose to have equality in the way they go through with their thought process. The main characters that show their prejudices are juror 10 and 3 but we also see the little prejudices the other jurors have‚ for example juror 5 and juror 4. There are also some characters in the court room that look to keep things equal and keep their prejudices out of their choice making. Juror 10’s
Premium Jury Not proven Law
Rose has used the actions and motives of the jurors as a method of characterising and thus criticising the practise of McCarthyism. A fine example of this is the 3rd juror. A reckless and unrestrained man‚ he makes accusations against fellow jurors for not siding with his point of view; ‘Listen‚ you voted “guilty”‚ didn’t you? What side are you on?’ – a direct reflection of the actions adopted by senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950’s. The 3rd juror also wrongly accuses the 5th for changing his vote
Premium Jury Law Critical thinking
a murder case. Twelve men were placed as jurors for a young man being accused of stabbing his father to death‚ During a preliminary tally‚ eleven tired men voted guilty‚ while one lone man voted not guilty. That person was Juror #8. A simple man nearing middle age with full dark hair‚ dark mystic eyes‚ and a well-leveled tone‚ who carried himself firmly. Of course‚ the eleven men grew frustrated with this and tried to explain to Juror #8 their reasons the young man was guilty. Juror #8 defended his
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Tyler Streets Dr. Lipson Organizational Behavior 200 01 November 2009 “12 Angry Men” Analysis By the sound of it‚ you would think “12 Angry Men” would be a football game‚ but a lot can be said for a jury proceeding and this movie does a great job of showing that. Twelve different men with twelve different personalities are locked in a room until they can unanimously agree to a verdict‚ a decision whether to put an 18 year old boy to death for a murder charge‚ or let him go free. When they enter
Premium Henry Fonda Psychology Man