Tort Reform XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX University Tort Reform In the past several years‚ the focus surrounding tort law has grown significantly. Why all the attention? Most people say it is because of the increase insurance liability and the recent up rise in ridiculous lawsuits. One of the most recognizable suits out there is the infamous “McDonald’s Hot Coffee” Lawsuit. This well known lawsuit sparked controversy and propelled
Premium Tort Medical malpractice
States justice system‚ a tort is best defined as an injury or loss that was committed deliberately or negligently by a single person or an entity (Crane). The history of tort law can be traced back to the initial trespass of property or person‚ but it was not until the 18th century that the distinction between intentional and unintentional acts was made (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). In recent years‚ tort law has become the center of scrutiny through the increase in tort costs‚ insurance liability
Premium Tort Tort law Common law
Tort reform is a very controversial issue; it is difficult to understand as the opinions are tossed around opposing sides. From the plaintiff’s perspective‚ tort reforms serves to benefit many of the major companies including insurance companies and doctor’s offices and/or hospital. From the defendant’s perspective‚ tort reform serves to harm the big companies as defense form extremely large punitive damage awards. The current is that there is a growing concern among some that there are overconsumptions
Premium Tort Jury trial
Tort Reform: The Destruction of the Civil Court System “If it ain’t broke‚ don’t fix it”. This informal maxim can be applied to countless situations‚ from car maintenance to business practices. It can also be applied to the idea of tort reform and its effect on the civil court system in the United States. ‘Tort reform’ commonly refers to “proposed changes to common law civil justice systems that would place limits or caps on tort litigation or damages to be awarded to a plaintiff” (“Tort Reform
Premium Jury trial Lawsuit Common law
case of Stella Liebeck versus McDonald’s‚ resulting from Ms. Liebeck’s efforts to collect for damages sustained when she spilled extremely hot coffee into her lap in 1992. The issues‚ applicable laws and the conclusion the jury reached will also be covered as well as the subsequent impacts on American tort law following this decision. The facts in the Liebeck case start with the incident description as recounted by Aric Press in the March 20‚ 1995 issue of Newsweek. Ms. Liebeck was a recently
Premium Tort Burn Damages
that led to the lawsuit The name of this case in this report is the Liebeck v. McDonald’s. Restaurants and the court in which the lawsuit was filed was The Second Judicial District Court in Bernalillo County‚ New Mexico. The lawsuit was filed with the original complaint was filed on March 21‚ 1993‚ and the plaintiff only sued P.T.S.‚ Inc.‚ a New Mexico corporation and the local franchise operator. “McDonald’s coffee spill" tort case became a widely known court case in the United States and internationally
Premium Food safety Foodborne illness Coffee
Liebeck v. McDonald’s‚ also known as the McDonald’s Coffee Case‚ is a 1994 product liability lawsuit. This lawsuit became one of the most famous in the US history because after the court’s awarded Stella Liebeck $2.9 million‚ after she was severely burned by the coffee she brought from McDonald‚ there were debates over tort reform in the US. Stella Liebeck‚ a 79-year-old woman was in the passenger seat of her grandson’s car‚ while she ordered a coffee from McDonald’s. Liebeck’s nephew parked
Premium Tort Burn Product liability
in the Field of Torts Induces Efficiency and Fairness 1. Introduction Over the past several years the body of laws governing compensation in tort law has substantially transformed from its common law origins. In the course of what many have advocated in the name of "tort reform‚" more than half of the United States have revised‚ or attempted to revise‚ one or more aspects of tort liability and damage principles to a greater or lesser degree. Tort law is‚ of course
Premium Tort
Argument against a cap on reward of damages The tort system was created to summarize compensation methods and amounts for wrongs and harms committed by one party to another. Tort law‚ in essence‚ aims to offer the damaged party a chance to restore their state back to its point of origin; in other words‚ the point of tort law is to place a financial obligation on an individual who causes harm to another party. The decision to put a cap on damages is not just harmful‚ but also makes it very
Premium Tort Tort law Law
A brief introduction of People’s Republic of China’s Tort Law Student Name: QIAN‚Xin Group: MLM09-01 Student Number:0892439 Table of Contents Background The Tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China (‘Tort Law’) which was passed on December 29‚ 2009‚ came into effect since July 1‚ 2010. It is believed that more and more public affairs could damage civil benefits as a result of the rapid development in china’s economy and society. As the response
Premium Tort Law Common law