The MV Lilian S 1 1 Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd 5 Court of Appeal‚ at Mombasa Nyarangi‚ Masime & Kwach JJ A November 17‚ 1989 Civil Appeal No 50 of 1989 (Appeal from an order of the High Court at Mombasa‚ Bosire J‚ in Admiralty Cause No 29 of 1988 dated 28th February‚ 1989) Admiralty Law – admirality jurisdiction of the High Court Kenya – circumstances in which the jurisdiction can be invoked – Judicature Act (Cap 8)‚ section 4 – Supreme Court Act‚ 1981 sections
Premium Appeal Court Supreme court
The Benetton supply chain One of the best known examples of how an organization can use its supply chain to achieve a competitive advantage is the Benetton Group. Founded by the Benetton family in the 1960s‚ the company is now one of the largest garment retailers‚ with stores which bear its name located in almost all parts of the world. Part of the reason for its success has been the way it has organized both the supply side and the demand side of its supply chain. Although Benetton does manufacture
Premium
PRICING AND LOGISTICS In the mid-1990s Benetton adopted a strategy of price-reduction worldwide. The strategy was designed to enable the company to guarantee its clients an ever more suitable and competitive supply of products. Simultaneously‚ Benetton decreased production costs. This combination of price and cost reductions resulted in an 8 percent increase in both items produced and sold in 1994. Benetton also has an extensive system of outlet stores in which to sell clothing at significant discounts
Premium Cost Logistics Marketing
List of Swiss Companies in India - 2008 Company Name CEO/Contact Person Address/ Tel/Fax/E-mail/ Website Business Activities/ Sector Swiss Partner / Parent Company Date of Commence ment of Operations in India 1949 Staff Strength (Approx.) ABB Limited Mr. Biplab Majumder Country Manager & Managing Director 2nd Floor‚ East Wing Khanija Bhavan 49‚ Race Course Road Bangalore 560 001 Tel : 080 22949101 Fax : 080 22949148 biplab.majumder@in.abb.com www.abb.com/in 522‚Udyog Vihar‚ Phase -V‚ Gurgaon
Premium Board of directors Managing director Mumbai
The courts enforce a liquidated damages clause even if the final result of a case seem to be not fair for any of the parties. This is because of the set out they have agreed on in a contract. However‚ the courts will not enforce a bargain that leads to a penalty. The liability of proving that a clause is a penalty is dependent on the person trying to deny the liquidated damages application. Therefore‚ there are indicators and teste for a penalty in law. The test for penalty is known as the Dunlop
Premium
in recent years. The high accidental rates might be lead by the human errors‚ which are including the person approach and the system approach(Reason‚ 2000). However‚ there are some causation models‚ such as James Reason’s model‚ which known as the Swiss Cheese Model‚ provides ascent to quite distinct philosophies of error management(Reason‚ 2000). Besides‚ there are some assets are found by the comparison among the Reason model and other models and has brought out overzealous implementations(School
Premium Human factors Human factors Failure
Bàitập 1 – Chương 1 HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders
Premium Corporation
Zeno Ltd [1964] 30 MLJ 314. Initially‚ Zeno Ltd‚ the respondent company entered into an agreement with a contractor named Ahmad‚ who had also secured contracts from the Petaling Jaya Authority for the construction of culverts. Under the contract‚ Zeno Ltd was the supplier of construction materials to Ahmad. They bought the materials and delivered to the construction site. Afterward‚ Ahmad’s contracts with Petaling Jaya Authority were cancelled due to the conflicts between them. Zeno Ltd informed
Premium Ownership Ownership Property
position or put the substitute things instead of the previous one. QUESTION 2(ii) Infinity & Co had sought our advice as to how it should respond to the major leak on the rooftop and the whole roof needs replacing. Case Law The case is refer to Riverside Property Investments Ltd. v Blackhawk Automotive [2004].The landlord‚ Riverside‚ claimed £87‚500 for replacement of the roof of a light industrial unit‚ plus £36‚200 for fees and costs incurred with the works from the tenant‚ Blackhawk. The works
Premium
company in the world‚ but other groups also chose it‚ so we had to change. We researched about successful cases in enterprise management and uniqueness. Finally we found a company‚ Benetton‚ which fits our requirements. Benetton is well known as a big company in fashion‚ but its beginning was very shabby and unique in character‚ and history. Benetton is a typical family business. Four Benetton brothers and sisters established this company. Maybe it is similar with Korea’s many old companies in terms
Premium Treviso Advertising Spirit