their portraits of a nation when they had no relation at all in time or culuture. This phenomenon in present in Tacitus’ Germania and Sima Qian’s Account of the Xiongnu. The former a senator and historian of the early Roman Empire‚ and the latter the “father of Chinese historiography” during the Han dynasty. Although there are obvious differences in style‚ these two historians
Premium Historiography Primary source Roman Empire
The Germania by Tacitus thoroughly examined Germany as a whole as well as individual Germanic tribes. In doing so‚ Tacitus emphasized three central characteristics: politics‚ religion‚ and the role of warfare. Politically‚ Germany The Germanic government was described as a rough democracy‚ with filtered input from the people and a subjective administration of justice. Kings were chosen at birth and continued the dynastic line of nobility‚ but even their power was not absolute or arbitrary. Leaders
Premium Germany German Empire Prussia
and one by Tacitus (the second-century historian)‚ and discuss their historical validity. 1)“At the age of nineteen on my own responsibiliy and at my own expense I raised an army‚...I transferred the republic from my power to the dominion of the senate and people of Rome.” -Augustus‚Res Gestae Divi Augusti 2)”One view of Augustus went like this: filial duty and national crisis had been merely pretexts...After that‚ there had certainly been peace‚ but it was a bloodstained peace”-Tacitus‚ Annals
Premium Augustus Roman Empire Roman Republic
individuals who were often more interested in their current political situations than the actual facts . Such is undoubtedly the case with the authors of the only primary texts recording the events surrounding Boudicca’s rebellion: Tacitus and Cassius Dio. Tacitus‚ for example‚ was more interested in his political agenda when writing the Agricola than when writing the Annals . Writing 40-50 years after the rebellion‚ he likely had detailed knowledge of the facts since his father in law was a soldier
Premium Woman Gender Roman Empire
senate‚ which Tacitus voiced in his Agricola and Germania. However‚ the structure of Roman government was brilliant and due to her value for liberty she set the foundation for other nations. Men of Rome natural crave philosophy and were able to use this branch of knowledge to their advantage. Tacitus mentions specific examples of men gaining political power with the help of philosophy. However‚ Tacitus denied the significant influence the Greek philosophers had in Rome‚ such as Plato. Tacitus recognized
Premium Roman Empire Ancient Rome
Roman presence. It is here that an ancient text will be utilized: Agricola by Tacitus. In review of this writing‚ it can be inferred that the British felt not only aggrieved‚ but also threatened‚ and vengeful. These feelings culminate when the natives of Caledonia turn to armed resistance against the Roman rulers2. Before to discussing the British reaction to Roman presence‚ it is very important to comprehend why Tacitus writes the way he does in Agricola. It is mentioned on the cover of the book
Premium Roman Empire Ancient Rome
Agricola and the Germania: As written by Tacitus The Agricola and the Germania were written by Tacitus in around 97A.D. The Agricola is an account of the life of Tacitus’ father-in-law Gnaeus Julius Agricola. The Germania is a description of the geography and culture of Germanic tribes. Agricola and the Germania give insight into Roman history. When Tacitus was writing this work‚ he was campaigning for office. He wanted these works to show his “expertise” and insight into the inner workings of
Free Roman Empire Ancient Rome
effective relationship with the Senate Source A “Tiberius remarked…that‚ although he did not feel himself capable of the whole burden of government‚ he was nevertheless prepared to take on any branch of it that might be entrusted to him.” (Tacitus The Annals p 40) Tiberius was the second emperor of Rome who succeeded Augustus in 14AD (Bradley‚ 1990). Throughout his reign as Emperor‚ Tiberius made numerous attempts to try and achieve an effective relationship with the Senate. Primarily seen
Premium Roman Empire Augustus
largely recounted by two of the most influential Roman historians of the ancient world‚ Cornelius Tacitus and Cassius Dio‚ the British were successfully presented to be of a barbaric nature; leaving behind a legacy of destruction and massacre that resulted in military failure and brought forth little success. But despite the obvious Roman agenda that has been intertwined within the recounts of Tacitus and Dio‚ they remain to be the only credible primary sources of information and provide the most
Premium Roman Empire Ancient Rome Augustus
that Agricola was of short term significance in military and cultural terms‚ but the degree of his significance comes into question according to each individual historian opinion. Most of the knowledge we have on Agricola comes from his son in law Tacitus. Leading to the inference that this would affect the general opinion on Agricola‚ as the only substantial information we have on him is faultlessly positive. It could be suggested that this unblemished depiction of Agricola would somehow influence
Premium Roman Empire Augustus