Fazio appealed the case because he claims that Cypress committed misrepresentation by silence and his case also falls into “the category of claims for which an action for fraudulent inducement lies”. When cypress promised to provide buyer with all information in its passion‚ which was in the LOI (letter of internet)
Premium
Another case that addresses drug testing is Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette Parish (1998). In this case we are looking at the Fourth Amendment rights of employees. Aubrey was a custodian at an elementary school. In December 1992 the board adopted an Employee Drug Testing Policy stating all "safety sensitive" employees are subject to random selection and drug testing each year. In August of 1993‚ Aubrey attended and in-service where the y policy was dispersed and reviewed. On September 28
Premium High school Education Supreme Court of the United States
Introduction: The case before us is interesting on several aspects. One‚ the patient is a minor who was treated for 3 days‚ successfully‚ before his parents could be contacted. Most importantly‚ this case is interesting because the causative agent was ultimately found to be a toothpick‚ identification of which was very difficult because a toothpick does not show on standard diagnostic imaging techniques such as MRI and CT scans. The patient’s family has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against
Premium Medical imaging Medical malpractice Blood
have the same property rights and if those rights are failed to be enforced that can be a reason for them to sue in court. This court case ended up having the court judge in favor of the Boys Scouts and both the Superior Court of New Jersey and the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled in favor of Dale in 1995. Later in 2000 the Boys Scouts sued Dale and took the case back to court. The Boys Scouts were suing back because they felt that the First Amendment was being violated. They said that their freedom
Premium Homosexuality Sexual orientation LGBT
It seems like an awfully difficult task to calculate lost profits to Main Line Pictures in this case. Kim Basinger‚ a well-known and very reputable actress‚ walked away from a movie deal causing Main Line Pictures to lose money. The amount of Main Line’s loss can never be determined with pinpoint accuracy‚ and Main Line would not have made the profit that they indicate they would have. However‚ is the plaintiff correct and are the claims the plaintiff is bringing forward reasonable? First‚ Main
Premium Maxima and minima English-language films American films
legally challenged her termination from Countrywide/Bank of America in 2008 and the Department of Labor ruled in her favor. As a government investigator for this case‚ offer objective observations to either support or criticize the Department of Labor’s decision in this case. The first impression when reading into the Eileen Foster case was that she was not wrongfully dismissed because it appeared that her actions were slightly overboard for an organization that was already aware of potential issues
Premium Employment Ethics Business ethics
According to the case of the three doctors‚ the ethical issue that has been going on with them is a big issue. There is no ethical side of the Dr. Black‚ in the situation of him changing his personality and become an irresponsible person of neglecting the patient has not only effected the job‚ but also how the patients look at the partnership of all the doctors. The trust the Dr. Black had in the clinic has been abused if the other two doctors did find what they think is cocaine. Yet Dr. Black had
Premium Drug addiction Medicine Employment
In this case‚ we know little about Kevin Ertle save for the fact that he is Bryce’s director of information technology. We are not advised of his experience level‚ his specific resources‚ or his department’s current level of responsibility. Similarly‚ we do not know very much about Bryce Power Tool Company‚ its management style‚ or how the project managers plan to proceed (e.g.‚ time‚ funding‚ etc). As we learned in chapter #9 (section 9.2)‚ many projects focus primarily on "time" rather than
Premium English-language films Learning Knowledge
that Uriah works weekends as an exotic dancer at a local nightclub. Unfortunately Mr. Heep‚ he was fired for “engaging in activities that could discredit the City.” He then took the action and liberty of sueing to get his job back. This is a complex case with several laws and exceptions that need to be analyzed. Should the plantiff Uriah Heep sue and get his job back or was it the right action for the City of Boca Grande to terminate his accounting position? The plaintiff Uriah Heep has several different
Premium Management Employment Ethics
The case is about an employee by the name Michael Hinske who has been employed at St. Charles University in Calgary‚ to help with the Student Learning and Writing Services (SLWS) program. However‚ after being hired Hinske‚ does not perform according to the expectations and his job description. His interrelationship skills with other workers seem to be very poor. Hinske puts Tracy Chan‚ the managing director of SLWS at the University‚ in a difficult situation. After months in his work‚ Hinske emails
Premium Employment Recruitment Performance