cease the sales which the merchandiser rejected. The trial court made a verdict in favor of the defendant‚ stating that the court does not have the personal jurisdiction over the defendant to sustain the case itself for trial‚ which resulted in this appeal in question. 2. ISSUE: Local or regional court has the jurisdiction over a commercial entity like an internet merchandiser
Premium United States Civil procedure Appeal
THIRD DIVISION [G.R. No. 126620. April 17‚ 2002] PRODUCERS BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES‚ petitioner‚ vs. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS‚ ASIA TRUST DEVELOPMENT BANK‚ RAINELDA A. ANDREWS‚ SAMSON FLORES‚ ALFONSO LEONG‚ JR.‚ RHODORA D. LANDRITO‚ JOSEPH CHUA‚ RAMON YU‚ EDUARDO G. ESCOBAR‚ MILAGROS B. NAYVE‚ ELIZABETH C. GARCIA‚ ALBERTO LIMJOCO‚ SR.‚ GLORIA E. MENPIN and ESPERANZA FLORENDO‚ respondents. D E C I S I O N CARPIO‚ J.: The Case In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the
Premium Appellate court Appeal Court
A unique and interesting problem arose when one company‚ a monopoly within the business-to-business (B2B) sensor market‚ split into six companies with identical products and equal footing within the market. As Director of Finance for Chester Company‚ one of the newly formed entities‚ it is important for me to identify a strategy that will enable the company to remain viable and be successful in the future. An in-depth analysis of the industry situation report provided good metrics to project future
Premium Marketing Term Appeal
TOPIC 5 MODERN COURT STRUCTURE IN USP COUNTRIES Topic 5: Concept Map Topic 5: Modern Court Structure in USP Countries 5.2 Topic Overview In the previous topic 4‚ we examined the concept of ‘court structures’ and identified the three basic tiers of courts‚ namely‚ ‘appellate’‚ ‘superior’ and ‘subordinate courts’. We explained that the courts in any legal system basically fall within these categories or within the other category that we called ‘special’ courts. We explained these
Premium Appeal Judge Appellate court
CIVIL PROCEDURE II Lecture 1 ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS The place and mode of trial is usually determined by type of trial and proceedings. If you make an application by summons‚ then you will be heard in Chambers. Procedure 1 – where defendant elects not to call evidence The Plaintiff or advocate makes an opening speech referred to sometimes as an opening statement. After that the plaintiff witnesses are called‚ examined cross examined and re-examined. After that the plaintiff or
Premium Appeal Appellate court Trial court
The poetry of Elizabeth Bishop appeals to Modern readers for many reasons There are many reasons why the poetry of Elizabeth Bishop would appeal to the modern reader. I would consider Bishops concern with everyday objects to be one of the most appealing attributes of her poetry. Bishop takes objects that everybody can relate to and understand‚ and through poems like ‘The Fish’ and ‘The Filling Station’ she gives these objects a wonderful and powerful significance. This technique allows the
Premium Poetry Appeal
the laws. Adopted in 1849‚ Article VI of the California Constitution states that the “judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court‚ Courts of Appeal‚ and Superior Courts‚ all if which are courts of record.” (California Secretary of State‚ 1849). There are approximately three levels to the California state court system: Superior Courts‚ Courts of Appeal‚ and the Supreme Court. In addition to these three
Premium United States Law Appeal
Hierarchy of courts in Nigerian Superior courts of Nigeria are courts which are listed in the Nigeria constitution of section 6 (5) which are namely: Supreme court Court of appeal The court of co-ordinate Jurisdiction Federal high court State high court Sharia court of appeal Customary court of appeal National industrial court Another superior courts added as amended by the 3rd alteration Act of 2010 is the NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT With regards to this court mentioned above
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Court
and friends have shipped him books that he sold through ebay and made around $1.2 million in revenue. In 2008‚ John Wilet & Sons‚ Inc‚ files suit against Supap for copyright infringement and won in two lower courts plus The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ban on importation of copyrighted works without the authority of the U.S. copyright owner. Kirtseeng had appealed to the Supreme Court‚ arguing the first-sale doctrine. a clause in the United States copyright which enables residents of
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
Johnson‚ No. CCR 84-46013-J (Crim. Ct. No. 7‚ Dallas Cnty. Tex. Dec. 13‚ 1984). He then appealed his case to the Texas Court of Appeals‚ Fifth District; however‚ the Court disagreed with Johnson and affirmed his conviction. Johnson v. State‚ 706 S.W.2d 120 (Tex. App. – Dallas 1986). Johnson once again appealed his case‚ this time to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Johnson v. State‚ 755 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). 5. Texas v. Johnson‚ 491 U.S. 397 (1989) 6. The Supreme Court held
Premium United States Law First Amendment to the United States Constitution