How should judges be appointed? Judges in the UK are often upper class‚ white men who have become judges through a good higher education and then a further training in judiciary. Currently‚ there are no black high court judges however the black population in prison is for ever growing. For the purpose of this essay‚ I shall be arguing that judges should be appointed based mostly on life experience and relativity. Of course a standard law degree and a solid understanding of the law is necessary but
Premium Judge Sociology Jury
of a life by trial in law; said person is the judge of the court system. A judge safeguards the law and holds the power of a god. Judges have left their mark throughout history by writing it themselves. The Salem Witch Trials are one of the nation’s most notorious cases of mass hysteria. Upwards of 150 people were accused and sent to trial. A judge would hear these trials and then choose life or death for these men and women. Only an effective judge should be placed in such a position where one can
Premium Crime Law Prison
DO JUDGES MAKE LAW? There are two main sources of English Law- legislation and cases. When interpreting legislation judges must ascertain the intention of Parliament and‚ except insofar as they apply the mischief rule of interpretation‚ they do not make law. Traditionally and due to the doctrine of the separation of powers judicial role is really not properly legislative at all‚ but consist merely in stating what the existing law actually is‚ and interpreting authoritatively doubtful points as
Free Common law Law Case law
such thing as judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable.” Generally‚ the position judges adopted is to interpret the law instead of concerning with the justice of their decisions. In modern tie‚ there is still existence of powerful ideology that denies any creative role to judges. The popular view of the judges is not to give
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
Judge Hathorne * A stubborn and ignorant man‚ John Hathorne is known as a leading judge in the Salem witch trials as well as the only one who did not repent his crimes after. * The judge was a great part of the real-life witch hunt‚ although Miller included other details in his characterizations to represent other judges involved (besides Danforth): ‘…while there were several judges of almost equal authority‚ I have symbolized them all in Hathorne and Danforth.’ * He disregards any opposition
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft
believe‚ as people it is human nature to judge. Whether it is judging food by the look‚ to judging book covers‚ to judging other people. It’s human nature to judge. Being me I have judged things numerous times‚ I do it a lot actually but I want to become better. Growing up I have seen people and have said to myself "that person doesn’t look very nice" or "what’s he wearing?". But I was taught not to judge growing up. Like the famous saying "don’t judge a book by its cover" my parents‚ and my
Premium High school Thought English-language films
Parliamentary sovereignty is the key stone in the British Constitution. If judges were to make law then they would be contradicting this doctrine. The legislative supremacy disqualifies the courts power to review the validity of legislation‚ refer to British Railway Board v Pickin . The objective of judges is to not make law but simply declare what the law had always been. Acts of Parliament are the highest form of authority and the courts hands are tied by it. But through the doctrine of precedent
Premium Common law Law Appeal
Review Questions When should a judge recuse himself or herself from a case? A judge should recuse himself or herself from a case when he or she may be biased towards a certain party. For example if a party might be a company in whom the judge has invested heavily‚ if its a friend or family member or the judge may feel that‚ for personal reasons where she or he may not be able to act impartially in case. What kinds of court cases are heard by federal courts
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States Court
Robart. Judge Robart’s viewpoints are strong and liberal‚ for which he believes that keeping refugees and immigrants away will not prevent the safety of U.S. citizens. President Trump believes that using force will help make the nation better again‚ which makes him more of an aggressive leader. On the other hand‚ Judge Robart believes that immigrants and refugees should not be forced to leave the U.S. unless they
Premium United States President of the United States Immigration to the United States
work group. Topics such as these are important to cover so that each individual has a complete understanding of the pros and cons of systems in the judicial system. What is a courtroom work group? “The professional courtroom actors‚ including judges‚ prosecuting attorneys‚ defense attorneys‚ public defenders‚ and others who earn a living serving the court.” (Pg. 312) By Frank Schmalleger 2011. From my understanding a courtroom work group is anyone who works as an employee of the court systems
Premium Judge Law Bench