Kathryn Marchessault Physics Lab LR Tuesday 8-9:55 Due 02/26/15 Experiment #1 Free Fall Experiment Abstract In this experiment we studied the motion of an object in free fall‚ that is an object being dropped from a certain height to Earth’s surface. In this experiment we tested the idea that no matter what the size‚ shape‚ color‚ etc. of the object if it would still experience the same constant acceleration throughout its fall (short distance). The constant downward acceleration it experiences
Premium General relativity Gravitation Classical mechanics
In the Tumble Buggy Lab‚ my partners and I used several different methods to calculate the velocity of a Tumble Buggy. The methods we used were a meter stick and a timer‚ a Spark Timer‚ a Photogate‚ and a Motion Sensor. Each method was different but overall‚ our velocities were very similar. Using the meter stick and timer‚ our velocity was 0.22 m/s. With the spark timer‚ our velocity was 0.26 m/s. Next‚ the velocity found with the Photogate was 0.325 m/s. Finally‚ when we used the motion sensor
Premium
Relation between image & object distance of lens & its focal length: lens equation. 1/f=1/do+1/di Law of refraction: n1sin0=n2sin02. Condition for multiple slit interference maximum: dsin0=mlambda Approach to optics treats light as a ray phenomenon: geometric optics Index of refraction for an optical material is- speed in light of vacuum:speed of light in material Relation between the refractive index‚ the two surface curvatures & the focal length of lens: lensmakers equation Snells law results
Premium Refraction Optics Geometrical optics
Experiment 7: Relative Density Laboratory Report Marella Dela Cruz‚ Janrho Dellosa‚ Arran Enriquez‚ Alyssa Estrella‚ Zacharie Fuentes Department of Math and Physics College of Science‚ University of Santo Tomas España‚ Manila Philippines Abstract The experiment was conducted to show the different methods on how to determine an object’s composition through its density and to determine an object’s density by displacement method and the Archimedes Principle. Results show that. The materials
Premium Density
Date preformed: 18/11/14 Lab Report: Pauline Peczar! partners: Meg‚ Polina‚ Jessie ! Verifying Newton”s Second Law of Motion ! ! Purpose: The purpose of this lab was to verify Newton’s second law of motion by determining the proportionality between acceleration and mass‚ and between acceleration and net force.! ! Apparatus:! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Materials: Dynamics cart‚ dynamics track‚ photogate‚ pulley‚ Lab Pro‚ Logger Pro ® ‚ Graphical Analysis ®‚ String‚ four 200g masses.! ! Procedure:
Free Newton's laws of motion Classical mechanics Acceleration
My lab results were similar to my hypothesis. My hypothesis was that the densest object would be the rubber stopper. In the lab results the densest object was the penny and the rubber stopper was second. My hypothesis was switched. My hypothesis was correct when I stated that the macaroni was the third densest object. My hypothesis was also correct for the dice‚ but the bead and the dice share the same density. So they are both the fourth densest item. I was wrong with my hypothesis when I placed
Premium Statistics Standard deviation Statistical hypothesis testing
Abstract :The purpose of the experiment is to explore elastic and inelastic collisions in order to study the conservation of momentum and energy. The guided track‚ carts‚ photogates ‚ 250 g weight and picket fences were the primary components used in the procedural part of the experiment. Each experiment involved the use of the photogates and picket fences to measure the initial and final velocities of both carts when they collide. The data was collected and translated to a graphical model for further
Free Kinetic energy Classical mechanics Introductory physics
LAB # 5 Relationship Between Drop Height and Diameter of Plasticine Sphere PROBLEM: A student suggest that there is a proportional relationship between height at which a plasticine sphere is dropped and the diameter of the flattened part after dropping. Design an experiment to determine if this suggestion is true or not. AIM: To investigate the relationship between the drop height and the flattened part of a plasticine sphere after being dropped. HYPOTHESIS: As the height of the sphere plasticine
Premium Measurement Circle
Physics Review Notes 2007–2008 Tom Strong Science Department Mt Lebanon High School strong@dementia.org June‚ 2008 The most recent version of this can be found at http://www.tomstrong.org/physics/ Chapter 1 — About Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 2 — Linear Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 3 — Projectile Motion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 4 — Newton’s First Law of Motion - Inertia . . . . .
Free Force Classical mechanics Newton's laws of motion
Examining the Refraction of Light in Prisms Questions 1. What is the relationship between the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction? The angle of incidence (formed by the ray of light travelling though air into a slab of rectangular perspex) is not directly proportional to the angle of refraction (angle formed between the ray travelling though perspex and the normal). The graph of the plotted angles of incidence against the angles of refraction is not a straight line and therefore demonstrates
Premium Refraction Total internal reflection Snell's law