GUANZON‚ Aldrin James L. PA 122 REGALA‚ Marc Daniel d. J. Hilda G. Diokno Lademora‚ Carl C. vs. CSC‚ Feb‚ 05‚ 2007 Facts: On February 3‚ 2006 petitioner‚ the duly elected Mayor of San Francisco‚ Agusan Del Sur‚ filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the invalidation of the approval of the temporary appointment of Daligdig with the CSC-CARAGA‚ where the case contains the following relevant portions: a) On July 5‚ 2005 Mayor Lademora appointed‚ Gil A. Daligdig as Municipal
Premium Municipality Mexico City Local government
Facts: Respondent is a Master Sergeant of the Phil. Air Force and the petitioners‚ Redentor Complate‚ employee of co-petitioner Elpidio Abaiad. Albayda was on his way to the office to report for duty‚ riding a bicycle ‚ the taxi driven by Completo bumped and sideswiped him‚ causing serious physical injuries. The Office of the City Prosecutor issued a resolution as Albayda said in his filling complaint‚ recommending the filing of an information for reckless imprudence resulting physical injuries
Premium Tort Law Jury
Common Carrier De Guzman vs Court of Appeals G.R. No. L-47822‚ December 22‚ 1988 Ponente : Feliciano‚ J.: Facts: Ernesto Cendana was engaged in buying up used bottles and scrap metal in Pangasinan and upon gathering sufficient quantities of such scrap material‚ respondent would bring such material to Manila for resale. On the return trip to Pangasinan‚ respondent would load his vehicles with cargo which various merchants wanted delivered to differing establishments in Pangasinan. For that
Premium Cargo Legal terms Transport
Thornton vs. Thornton‚ G.R. No. 154598 August 16‚ 2004‚ J. Corona Facts: Petitioner‚ an American‚ and respondent‚ a Filipino‚ were married in Manila. A year later‚ respondent gave birth to a baby girl. However‚ after three years‚ respondent grew restless and bored as a plain housewife. She wanted to return to her old job as a "guest relations officer" in a nightclub‚ with the freedom to go out with her friends. Whenever petitioner was out of the country‚ respondent was also often out with her friends
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Habeas corpus Court
Aznar vs. Garcia Facts: Edward Christensen was born in new York but migrated to California where he resided for a period of 9 years. In 1913‚ he came to the Philippines where he became a domiciliary until his death. In his will‚ he instituted an acknowledged natural daughter‚. Maria lucy Christensen (legitimate)‚ as his only heir‚ but left a legacy sum of money in favor‚ of Helen Christensen Garcia (illigetimate). Counsel for Helen claims that under article 16‚ paragraph 2 of the civil code‚ California
Premium Marriage Family law Law
1. Ladera v. Hodges G.R. No. 8027-R‚ September 23‚ 1952‚ Vol. 48‚ No. 12‚ Official Gazette 5374Reyes‚J.B.L.‚ J. FACTS: Paz G. Ladera entered into a contract with C.N. Hodges. Hodges promised to sell a lot with an area of 278square meters to Ladera‚ subject to certain terms and conditions. The agreement called for a downpayment of P 800.00 and monthly installments of P 5.00 each with interest of 1% per month‚ until P2‚085 is paid in full. Incase of failure of the purchaser to make any monthly
Premium Real property Property Personal property
Palmas Case (US v. Netherlands) Permanent Court of Arbitration (1928) 2 U.N. Rep. Int’l Arbitral Awards 829 Facts The Island of Palmas is about halfway between the Philippines (formerly under Spanish control) and the Nanusa Island group (formerly of the Dutch East Indies class). In the Treaty of Paris (1898)‚ the island lied within the boundaries of the Philippines ceded by Spain to the US. Arguments US: As the successor of Spain‚ who was the first to discover the island‚ the US has
Premium Netherlands Spanish language Dutch Empire
Cyruz P. Tuppal 2011-0134 Case Title: STARLITE VS NLRC G.R. No.: G.R. No. 78491 Date: March 16‚ 1989 Petitioner: Starlite Plastic Industrial Corporation Respondent: National Labor Relations Commission and Edgar Gomez Ponente: J. Cortes Facts: Private respondent GOMEZ was employed as a factory worker by STARLITE sometime in March 1981. On 22 June 1984‚ STARLITE dismissed him on the ground that he was caught attempting to steal one ballast costing P80.00. STARLITE reported
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-12342 August 3‚ 1918 A.A. ADDISON‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ Vs. MARCIANA FELIX and BALBINO TIOCO‚ defendants-appellees. FACTS: By a public instrument dated June 11‚ 1914 plaintiff Addison sold to the defendant Marciana Felix and husband Balbino Tioco‚ 4 parcels of land. Defendants paid‚ at the time of the execution of the deed‚ the sum of P3‚000.00 on account of the purchase price‚ and bound herself to pay the remainder in installments
Premium Legal terms Property law Contract
Art. 1544- Double Sale G.R. No. L-19248 7 SCRA 452 February 28‚ 1963 ILUMINADO HANOPOL vs. PERFECTO PILAPIL‚ BARRERA‚ J.: Case Nature : APPEAL from a decision of the Court of First instance of Leyte. Facts: Hanopol claims ownership of the land by virtue of a series of purchases effected in 1938 by means of private instruments‚ executed by the former owners surnamed Siapo. Additionally‚ he invokes in his favor a decision by the CFI of Leyte (in Civil Case No. 412) rendered
Premium Property Appellate court Appeal