New Jersey v. T.L.O.‚ (1985) is the case that impacted me the most. It is a decision by the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of a search of a public high school student after she was caught smoking. A search of her purse revealed drug paraphernalia‚ marijuana‚ and documentation of drug sales. She was charged as a juvenile for the drugs and paraphernalia found in the search. She went against the search‚ claiming it violated her 4th Amendment right against unreasonable searches. The
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Case: R v. Hebert Facts of Case Judges: Dickson‚ Robert George Brian; Lamer‚ Antonio; Wilson‚ Bertha; La Forest‚ Gérard V.; L’Heureux-Dubé‚ Claire; Sopinka‚ John; Gonthier‚ Charles Doherty; Cory‚ Peter deCarteret; McLachlin‚ Beverley Neil Hebert was suspected of having robbed the Klondike Inn. After the police located Hebert‚ they placed him under arrest and informed him of his rights‚ and took him to the R.C.M.P detachment in Whitehorse. Hebert contacted counsel and obtained legal advice regarding
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Police
Title: R. v. Hufsky‚ [1988] 1 S.C.R 621 Parties: Werner E. J. Hufsky – Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen - Respondent Decision: Appeal was dismissed Notions/Concepts: Constitutional Law Criminal Law Equality before the law Charter of Rights and Freedoms Arbitrary detention Unreasonable Search Refusal to provide breath sample Facts: Appellant was stopped at a random spot check by police Nothing unusual about his driving at the time of the spot check Spot check was for the purposes
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States
appealed the case to the appellate division‚ which found that no violation of the Fourth Amendment had taken place‚ but returned the case to the juvenile court for a possible Fifth Amendment violation dealing with her confession. T.L.O. appealed the ruling of the appellate division’s ruling on the Fourth Amendment‚ the case was then sent to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the appellate
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Microsoft South Africa Timeline 1956 Department Store Law in Japan required that a permit be obtained for each new department store. 1957 Charles Lazarus started Children’s Supermarket in the US. It was later renamed as Toys R Us. 1966 Toys R Us was sold to Interstate Stores. 1971 McDonald’s introduced fast-food in Japan by entering the market with a joint venture with Fujita & Company. 1973 Japan introduced the Large Scale Retail Law subjecting large retailors to a rigorous screening process-Submit
Premium Retailing
Savannah Paterson FINAN Case Questions #5 Toys “R” Us LBO 1. What are the risks and merits of the transaction? This LBO transaction has both risk and profit potential. KKR‚ Bain‚ and Vornado Realty Trust face risk because the industry that Toys “R” Us (toys) is currently in‚ the retail toy industry‚ is in a decline. Industry sales have been down 4% in the last year‚ and analysts don’t have a positive projection for future sales in the US. This declining industry‚ and threat of new competitors
Premium Leveraged buyout Private equity
1. Name and Citation R. v. Williams‚ [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128 2. Type and Level of Case This case was heard by the British Colombia Court of Appeal on February 24th‚ 1998 and a decision was made on June 4th‚ 1998. 3. Facts The accused‚ an aboriginal man‚ pleaded guilty to robbery charge‚ saying that the robbery was done by someone other than himself. He was elected a trail by judge and jury. First Trail; questions were asked to jury to assure the jury was unbiased‚ 12 of 43 potential jurors were dismissed
Premium Jury Court Appeal
Toys “R” Us LBO Background Toys "R" Us‚ Inc. is the world’s leading dedicated toy and juvenile products retailer. As of January 29‚ 2005‚ it operated 1‚499 retail stores worldwide and generated 11.1 billion in revenue. However‚ that’s a decrease of 1.9 percent from a year ago. Toys "R" Us has suffered from both downstream demand and increased competition from mass/discount channel such as Wal-Mart and Target. A group of private equity investors intends to do a leverage buyout of Toys "R" Us. They
Premium Leveraged buyout Private equity
R. v Burns case Brief Case Facts The defendants Glen Sebastian Burns and Atif Ahmad Rafay were accused to have committed aggravated first degree murder in Washington State. In a confession to an undercover RCMP officer in British Columbia‚ posing as a mob boss‚ it is clamed that Burns was a contract killer hired by Rafay to kill his parents so that Rafay could get insurance money for their deaths. It is claimed that Burns beat the victims with a baseball bat while Rafay watched (para.10). They
Premium Appeal Crime Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The purpose of this report was to investigate a makeup brand named NYX Cosmetics under L’oreal Company for the development of CLENATARA. The information used in this report was analyzed from websites on the references. An interview couldn’t be conducted. NYX Cosmetics is a cosmetics company founded in Los Angeles by Toni Ko in 1999. Later in 2014‚ Toni Ko sold NYX to L’Oréal. NYX is now under L’oreal’s Consumer Products Division. In L’oreal there are 4 divisions and 10 departments are managed by
Premium Management Corporate governance Cosmetics