Table of contents Table of Cases 1. Kopitoff v Wilson (1876) 1 QBD 337. 2. India v West Coast Steamship Co [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 278. Table of Statues 1. The Hague Rules 2. The Hague-Visby Rules 3. The Hamburg Rules 4. The Rotterdam Rules Commentary on the Rotterdam Rules Ⅰ Introduction: Background of the Rotterdam Rules It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions
Premium Law of the sea Law Transport
To be able to thoroughly discuss exclusionary rule‚ there has to be some sort of basic knowledge of what it is. Exclusionary rule is a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This paper will be discussing how exclusionary rule first came about and how it has evolved into what it is now. So this paper will‚ in a way‚ be a timeline of the exclusionary rule. Exclusionary rule was first discussed in the case of Boyd v. US (1886). Boyd v. US (1886) was about trying
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule United States Constitution
The One-Drop Rule: A Key Player in the Construction of Race in the United States Barack Obama’s election as the President of the United States in 2008 was considered by many to be a representation of the huge strides the country has made in terms of race relations. Considering that blacks in America were denied civil rights less than five decades ago‚ his election certainly indicates that progress has been made. Obama and his election to office is linked to this progress because much of the population
Premium United States World War II Olympic Games
Case Digest on Natural Resources Law San Miguel Corporation vs. Court of Appeals Facts: A petition for review on certiorari was filed by San Miguel Corporation (SMC) against Court of Appeals for denying its application for registration of a parcel of land located at Sta. Anastacia‚ Sto. Tomas‚ Batangas with lot number 684 with an area of 14‚531 square meters. The lot was purchased by SMC from Silverio Perez in the amount of Php 133‚084.80 on December 23‚ 1975. Accordingly he inherited
Premium Appellate court Supreme Court of the United States Trial court
Flies – Rules‚ Laws and Custom In a functioning society‚ laws are necessary to govern behaviour and make equal opportunities for everyone. The movie Lord of the Flies clearly exemplifies the need for laws and how laws must be enforced t be effective. Without laws anarchy would surely ensue as explored through “Lord of the Flies”. Anarchy is the state of disorder due to a poor system of law or poor enforcement of the law‚ in Lord of the Flies Ralph‚ who was the ‘leader’ creates a set of laws without
Premium Law Murder International law
Evaluate the effectiveness of the law in balancing the rights of victims‚ offenders and society (in general) in relation to the case of Gordon Wood. The law’s primary objective is to provide justice for all parties involved in legal disputes; however‚ as demonstrated through the Gordon Wood case it is evident that the law has been ineffective in balancing the rights of those concerns and deliver just outcomes. This is illustrated by the factors of delivery of just outcomes‚ time and complexity which
Premium Law
By use of examples‚ explain how an agreement recognized by the law of contract Law of contract is body of legal rules governing the conclusion and consequences of contract. Contract is an agreement based on consensus between legal subjects with contractual capacity. Which is legal‚ physically possible and complies with the prescribed formalities and which is reached with the intension of creating a legal obligation with resultant rights and duties? 1. Consideration It’s the price paid by
Premium Contract Law Gentlemen's agreement
"English-Only Rule"? "The English-Only Rule is a rule that some businesses have that require there employees to speak only English inside the workplace."(HRM) There is an ongoing debate on whether or not this rule is a safety issue or just plain discrimination. Some people see the rule as a helpful safety precaution around the workplace‚ while others see it as a discrimination of there native language. Either way the rule does exist and is causing a stir around the workplace. English-Only laws very
Premium Human rights Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Rights
Golden Rule Of Interpretation-Comparision Between English Law And Indian Law INTRODUCTION The golden rule is that the words of a statute must prima facie be given their ordinary meaning. It is yet another rule of construction that when the words of the statute are clear‚ plain and unambiguous‚ then the courts are bound to give effect to that meaning‚ irrespective of the consequences. It is said that the words themselves best declare the intention of the law-giver. In law‚ the Golden
Premium
Respondent: Led to permanent injury. Interviewer: (81:13) But how did the actions of your friend and your play dad‚ that their actions led to you having permanent injury? Respondent: No. My play dad didn’t even… My friend‚ yes is… Yes‚ he is responsible for my injury. Interviewer: (81:36) What was it that… Let me just get this right. You’re saying it led to greater… Your friend’s actions led to you having a greater injury? Respondent: Mm-hmm (agreement). Interviewer: (81:49) What exactly did he do
Premium Injury Psychology Injuries