attached. The property was bought for R750 000 and was registered on our name 26 November 2013. 6.2. The 1481 Breyer Avenue property was brought for R 1 450 000‚ and was registered in October 2012 in the taxpayer’s names. A deed search can be obtained to verify the above. 6.3. The full amount of the bond was utilised for the acquisition of both properties. 6.4. No‚ the bonds was not increased subsequent to the purchase of the Limpopo property. 6.5. Steps taken to transfer the properties into profitable
Premium Property Tax Renting
Project Title: Bring Unity in Response to Anti-vandalism (BURA) Project Description Vandalism is defined as a willful or malicious destruction or defacement of the things of beauty or of public or private property. It is considered as a major offense as provided by the Notre Dame of Midsayap College (NDMC handbook‚ but campaign against it is not strongly implemented. Vandalism is often caused by ideological‚ vindictive and malicious reasons. Boredom and exam charters contributes to the problem
Premium Property Education Project management
MOSK GIVES US MOORE OF AN IDEA ABOUT PROPERTY Contents MOSK GIVES US MOORE OF AN IDEA ABOUT PROPERTY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 PROPERTY DEFINITION 4 ADAPTABILITY 5 LEGISLATIVE GUIDANCE 6 ETHICS AND EQUITY 7 WEAKNESSES OR STRENGTHS? 10 POST ‘MOORE’TEM 13 CONCLUSION 14 INTRODUCTION The question of property rights in human tissue has traditionally been relevant in matters concerning dead bodies. However‚ with the rise of Biotechnology human tissue storage is increasing rapidly
Premium Property Law Property law
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY CONDITION REPORT Disclaimer This condition report concerns the immovable property situated at [furnish both deeds office and physical descriptions of the property concerned] (“the property”). This report does not constitute a guarantee and/or warranty of any kind or nature by the owner of the property or by the property practitioners representing that owner in any transaction. This report should‚ therefore‚ not be regarded as a substitute for any inspections or warranties
Premium Real estate Property Ownership
Property and the Concept of ‘Stridhana’ As mentioned earlier there were two schools of law namely Mitakshara school and Dayabhaga school. In both the schools women’s property rights were restricted. Under Mitakshara law male were coparcenaries ie‚ the owners of land. They got this right by birth and not by succession. But the main characteristic of this property was the inalienability. A person who possessed that property cannot dispose it by sale‚ gift or by will. Ownership was just a notion. The
Premium Marriage Property Wife
Swettenham Rubber Co Ltd [1913] 15 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi [1905] 16 Schultz v Corwill Properties (1969) 16 Russo v Bendigo Bank Ltd (1993) 17 The In Personam Exception 18 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 18 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co Ltd v Gosper (1991) 20 Vassos v State Bank of South Australia (1993) 20 Special equity cases: 21 Personal equity and breach of trust: 22 Personal Equities and Mistake 23 OTHER EXCEPTIONS; OVERRIDING STATUTES 23 The Register‚ equitable
Premium Property law Easement Mortgage
to own private property and the ability to rule. Plato’s‚ The Republic and Aristotle’s‚ the Politics of Aristotle illustrates both philosophers’ ideal states of regime. It is also where we get a clear view on the different opinions both men have on the subject of ruling and ownership. Plato believed that the abolishment of Private property was necessary especially for the Guardians and the auxiliaries. While Aristotle on the other hand‚ criticized the abolition of private property‚ believing that
Premium Property Political philosophy Plato
but the most valuable assets as they compose the intellectual property of the business. Companies do not always recognize correctly the intellectual property they possess and as a consequence they cannot benefit from what they have. That is why it is of crucial importance to identify what the intellectual property is; and to know how to protect the exclusive right of the inventor from all the possible infringements. Intellectual property law guards the originators in titling them with trademarks
Premium Trademark Copyright Intellectual property
PROPERTY LAW 2013 Contents 1. Rights Above and Below Land……………………………………………………. 3 2. Fixtures and Related Matters……………………………………………………… 7 3. Co – Ownership……………………………………………………………………. 12 4. Easements………………………………………………………………………….. 26 5. Covenants………………………………………………………………………….. 35 6. Adverse Possession………………………………………………………………... 46 7. Native Title Legislation and Indigenous Land Rights Legislation………………... 60 1. Rights Above and Below Land Cuius est solum eius usque ad coelom
Premium Property law Real estate
Summary: In our case scenario Bart and Alan bot reside in Boring‚ Oregon. Alan is the finder of Bart’s lost item before Bart offers a reward. In Contract law a reward offer is binding. In Property law a person has a responsibility to return lost personal property to its rightful owner. Issue: Is Alan entitled to collect a reward before he returns Bart’s object? Rule: MacFarlane v. Bloch‚ 59 Ore. 1 (Or. 1911) In the above mentioned case‚ one party found a pocketbook with a value
Free Property Property law Law