CASE ANALYSIS NIKE THE SWEATSHOP DEBATE Summary of the Facts Nike was established in 1972 by former University of Oregon track star Phil Knight. ... Nike has $10 billion in annual revenues and sells its products in 140 countries. ... Nike has been dogged for more than a decade by repeated accusations that its products are made in sweatshops where workers‚ many of them children‚ slave away in hazardous conditions for less than subsistence wages. ... Many reporters‚ TV shows‚ companies and organizations
Premium Phil Knight Minimum wage Human rights
Do you think the criticism of Nike is fair‚ considering that the host countries are in dire needs of creating jobs?Yes and no. In a pure capitalist economic system employers will seek to pay workers as little in cash and benefits as possible and will locate his plant in the location that incurs the least cost. That being said there is a certain moral consideration to pay a wage that allows the worker to reasonably support themselves and their dependents. Lastly you should consider Henry Ford’s Famous
Free Capitalism Economic system Wage
Sweatshops: Economical v. Ethical As corporate social responsibility is being widely implemented and scrutinized among society‚ sweatshops have become a controversial topic. Many view sweatshops as an unethical practice of corporations. However‚ it may not be perceived the same to others. Globalized companies take advantage of the cheaper labor costs when issuing their factories in countries such as: Bangladesh‚ Malaysia‚ and Thailand. Though child labor‚ low worker pay and poor working conditions
Premium Business ethics Ethics Globalization
Nike Sweatshops Slavery or Opportunity? Nike-Helping the poor Thesis- In the past Nike has had problems with sweatshops‚ but the company is helping the poor and has changed in many ways. I. Problems A. Worker wages 1. How much they get paid 2. Can they fulfill their basic needs 3. Can they support a family B. Quality of environment 1. Conditions they live in 2. Type of protection they use against harm 3. Chemicals or solvents they used to make a product with II. Improvements A. Sweatshops
Premium Poverty Minimum wage Slavery
The Nike Sweatshop DebateShould Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own‚ but where subcontractors make products for Nike?Nike is definitely not only responsible but also accountable for the working conditions of foreign factories that it does not own which it subcontracts with. Nike should have taken the initiative to be responsible of the contractors/employees working in other countries on a global scale. For example: Recently‚ Pepsi Cola was in
Premium Minimum wage Wage Employment
NIKE Case Study Krystle Guerrero University of Phoenix MGT 448 Professor Michael Ladah The Nike Corporation is the world’s leading supplier of athletic shoes and apparel. The company takes its name from the Greek goddess of victory‚ and has fulfilled its reputation of being victorious in the sporting good industry for over a decade. Nike has amassed skyrocketing production numbers through independently contracting companies outside of the United States to manufacture
Premium Employment Sweatshop Athletic shoe
A Case Analysis of Nike: The Sweatshop Debate Mindi Merritt Class Fall 2014 Instructor’s Name Introduction Nike is a hugely successful global industry that designs and markets shoes and apparel (Coakley & Kates‚ 2013). Most of Nike’s products are subcontracted and manufactured overseas in countries such as China‚ India‚ Vietnam‚ Indonesia and Korea. For decades‚ Nike has been embroiled in controversy where critics claim its products are manufactured in foreign factories with substandard
Premium Labor Child labour Wage
"Nike is criticized for using sweatshops in countries like Indonesia and Mexico. The company has been subject to much critical coverage of the often poor working conditions and the exploitativeness of the cheap overseas labor." answers.com 1. Should Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own‚ but where sub-contractors make product for Nike? Yes‚ but I do not believe that the firm is 100% responsible since it is the sub-contractors who operate
Premium Industrial Revolution Factory Sweatshop
Sandi Wodarczak BA206 – Nike Case Study Due: February 16‚ 2011 Nike: Spreading Out to Stay Together Informal structures are thought to be good during times of change‚ but can be the cause for big problems during change. When an outsider is brought into an informal structure‚ operating under a matrix‚ there may be friction as the outsider never really gets to be an insider. I think this is what happened with Perez. Perez was the outsider brought in to take over for the insider‚ Knight
Premium Organizational structure Adidas Nike, Inc.
Amanda Merkatz Management 301-02 Case Study 11 11252895 1. How does Nike’s decision to retain an in-house arm of ad agency Wieden & Kennedy exemplify the concept of organizational design? The decision to retain an in-house arm of ad agency exemplify the concept of organizational design‚ makes you look at how both companies interpret organizational design. Organizational design is the process of creating structures that accomplish the company’s missions and objectives. First looking at the text
Premium Advertising Graphic design Sweatshop