Corporate Sustainability is Attainable: NIKE Case Study SUS 500 A1 - Principles of Sustainability October 17‚ 2010 Abstract Nike‚ Inc. is one of the world’s largest manufacturers and brands of athletic apparel‚ shoes‚ and equipment. The company has undergone a revolution in the past decade. They have gone from a risk management‚ philanthropic and compliance model to a long-term strategy focused on innovation‚ collaboration‚ transparency‚ and advocacy. This paper discusses the goals of Nike’s
Premium Sustainability
name Nike they think of great footwear‚ quality apparel and top of the line athletic merchandise. People wear the Nike swooshes with pride‚ thinking what they are wearing will improve their own personal athletic goals‚ or simply boost their self-confidence. Also‚ people purchase the Nike brand because they relate it with so many of the athletes who Nike endorses. Nike being in the market‚ has opened so many doors for athletes and being in the media and advertising positive social values. Nike is a
Premium Nike Mass media
Nike Case Study Table of Contents Part 1 Page Introduction and Overview 3-4 Part 2 Nike Company Information 5-6 Part 3 Nike weaknesses 7-8 Part 4 Ethics and impacts 9-10 Part 5 Conclusion 11 References 12 Nike manufactures and markets sports apparel and equipment on a global scale. They operate in 160 different countries‚ and have revenues of $18
Premium Nike, Inc. Business ethics Athletic shoe
Nike Ethical Dilemmas Ethical Audit Report Table of Contents Nike Ethical Dilemmas 1 Ethical Audit Report 1 Executive summary 2 Purpose of the Report 2 A Snapshot of Nike’s Business Ethics 3 Ethical Dilemma’s Facing Nike 4 Nike’s Best Ethical Practices 7 Conclusion 8 References 9 Executive summary As globalization increases the scope of the Multinational Companies (MNCs) to penetrate the market both for cost effective
Premium Corporate social responsibility Business ethics Social responsibility
increase its capital is a corporation. There are also non-profit corporations organized for religious‚ educational‚ charitable or public service purposes. One of the corporations are the “Nike‚ Inc” which in other words can be said a company. And what here will be discussed the process how a corporate body that is Nike governs‚ ethic of it and the corporate responsibility of it upon the business world and balance of interest of the stakeholders such as Government‚ Employees‚ Customers‚ Suppliers‚ Creditors
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe
Case Study 1: Nike April‚ 11‚ 2013 Nike (originally named Blue Ribbon Sports) was founded in 1964 by Phil Knight and his University of Oregon track Coach Bill Bowerman. It was born as a business project of Knights while he was in Stanford. The idea was to import shoes from Japan into the U.S. Up until this point the majority of shoes were imported from Germany. By importing the shoes from Japan the cost would drastically be improved because of labor savings. Nike‚ with the ingenious
Premium Bill Bowerman Corporate social responsibility Nike, Inc.
PRESENTATION ON EXPORT CUSTOM PROCEDURE Tuesday‚ November 10‚ 2009 S I O M 1 Presented by: * Rinto Rajan (44) * Prakash Khaladkar (43) * Nihal Mansoori (47) * Pragya Mishra (26) Tuesday‚ November 10‚ 2009 S I O M 2 CONTENTS Introduction Registration stage Pre-shipment stage Shipment stage Post shipment stage Shipping and custom formalities Procedure for realization of export proceeds Conclusion S I O M 3 Tuesday‚ November 10‚ 2009 Introduction Export procedure
Premium International trade Export Import
Running head: Nike and the Sweatshop Debate Nike the Sweatshop Debate Shelia D. Marshall Global Strategies MGT 448 Shabbir Karim October 12‚ 2009 Nike the Sweatshop Debate Beneath all the hoopla and controversy about Nike being a successful company in the United States in which its earnings in 2009 according to Hoovers Inc.‚ 2009‚ Nike’s revenue for 2009 was $19‚ 176.1 million and their gross profit was $8‚604.4 million‚ made possible by the hands of women and underage workers
Premium Corporate social responsibility Sweatshop Social responsibility
` case? 2. Why should Nike be held responsible for what happens in factories that it does not own? Does Nike have a responsibility to ensure that factory workers receive a “living wage”? Do the wage guidelines of FLA or WRC seem most appropriate to you? Why? 3. Is it ethical for Nike to pay endorsers millions while its factory employees receive a few dollars a day? 4. Is Nike’s responsibility to monitor its subcontracted factories a legal‚ economic‚ social‚ or philanthropic responsibility
Premium Factory Social responsibility Ethics
Nike versus Adidas As companies decided to dip into new markets‚ they develop a marketing plan‚ review external and internal contingencies and complete a SWOT analysis on their organization and competitors. Adidas is one of those companies that have completed this task as it prepares to fight against Nike to become the number one company in the market for footwear and sports apparel. With Adidas and Nike being in the same market they have similar external contingencies‚ yet different views
Premium Adidas Nike, Inc. Marketing