“To what extent was the inability of Nicholas II to bring about effective reforms responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty” The inability of tsar Nicholas II to bring about effective reform was a fundamental cause to the eventual fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Years of discontent and ineffective or absent reform had resulted in widespread displeasure from the Russian public‚ and proved to be the catalyst for much of the protest and rebellion in the following years. However‚ whilst a prevalent
Premium Nicholas II of Russia Russian Empire Russia
Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964? Over the period from 1855 to 1964‚ Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact
Premium Russia Russian Empire Alexander III of Russia
economic- of Russia became far beyond than the countries nearby. In addition to the appearance of a range of social problems‚ a strong trend of rebellion against authority occurs. The 1905 Revolution‚ the February and October Revolution in 1907‚ were the best examples to illustrate the desperate demand and effects on Russians of changes in economy‚ society and politics caused by over throwing the ruler. The 1905 revolution was the
Premium Russia Russian Empire Soviet Union
Background to Revolution * Russia had no competent military leaders: Czar Nicholas II insisted on taking charge of the armed forces despite his lack of training * Also‚ Russian industry was unable to produce the weapons needed for the army * Between 1914 and 1916‚ two million soldiers were killed‚ and another four to six million wounded or captures. By 1917 the Russians will to fight was gone * Beginnings of Upheaval * Czar Nicholas II was an autocratic ruler who relied
Premium Russia Saint Petersburg Soviet Union
historic revolution. In 1917‚ tensions among millions of taciturn Russians initiated concerns against the incompetent Tsarist regime. Tsar Nicholas II‚ divine right ruler‚ had repeatedly disappointed the Russian people‚ due to his lack of political ability and belief in his decisions. Tsar Nicholas created an unsystematic‚ corrupt Government‚ lacking control of Russia. Russia’s involvement in World War One was disastrous‚ due to the lack of modern industrialisation and preparation of the military. The
Premium Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia World War I
Topic 1- Decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty Syllabus outline Nicholas II as autocrat Political‚ social and economic grievances in early 20th century Russia The tsar’s failure to address the problems of Russia The role of WWI in the fall of the tsarist regime Focus questions How stable was the social basis of tsarist rule? Why was the government unable to meet the challenges emerging in the first decade and a half century? How important were the Bolsheviks before 1917? What effect did
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
the overthrow of monarchy in Russia. Long-term causes can include weaknesses of the Russian monarchy‚ failure of having strong armed forces‚ agricultural backwardness and late industrialization. First World War‚ Tsar Nicholas II mistakes‚ growing peasants unrest‚ bad harvest‚ food shortages‚ famine and growing political opposition can be regarded as short-term causes which determined the downfall of the Tsardom. The Revolution in February and abdication of Nicholas II led to the creation of the Provisional
Free Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia Russia
Questions and Anwers: Russia 1. What effect did the Decembrist Revolt had upon the character of Czarist rule? The rising of the Decembrist Russia was due to a momentary confusion over the succession. In 1825‚ Alexander I died suddenly. Alexander’s younger brother‚ Constantine‚ who was next in line‚ had no desire to assume the troublesome burden of ruling and unsettled and distrusted empire‚ so he renounced his right of succession in favour of his brother Nicholas. Nicholas‚ however‚ had been left
Free Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
(Oxley‚ 2001) until the death of Tsar Nicholas II‚ a span of 455 years (Why
Premium Russian Empire Russia Nicholas II of Russia
fall of the Tsar in the February Revolution of 1917? Russia’s poor performance in the war was an extremely important factor because it led to the Tsar becoming more unpopular. At the beginning of the war‚ there was a strong sense of patriotisms in Russia due to the excellent war performance. The decline in Russia’s war performance caused morale in the army and country to decrease. The situation of the war was made worse by the fact that in September 1915 after the Russians lost battles to the Germans
Premium Russian Empire World War I Nicholas II of Russia