Sample Tutorial Answers (HBL221N Company Law) To answer all legal questions‚ students are to follow the essential steps of: (1) Identification of the issues in the questions; (2) State the relevant laws that can be used to resolve the issues in the questions; (3) Application of the relevant laws to the facts in the questions to resolve the issues in the questions (i.e. arguments); and (4) Conclusion based on arguments in Point (3). Your conclusion must resolve your issues in Point (1). NOTE:
Premium Corporations law Stock Law
Company Law – An Introduction Unit Code: DE5H 35 Outcome 1 Melissa Mackenna-500006315 Context Within this report you will find: 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Terms of Reference 1.3. Sole Traders 1.4. Partnerships 1.5. Corporate Bodies 1.5.1. Private Limited Companies 1.5.2. Public Limited Companies 1.6. Conclusion 1.7. Recommendations 1.8. Appendix 1.1. Introduction The aim of this report is to: Describe the differences in legal personalities and responsibilities between
Premium Corporation Types of companies Limited liability partnership
incorporate? If so‚ should she adopt a company structure? • Assuming Susan adopts a company structure‚ what type of Liability Company should Susan adopt? Relevant Laws: Form of association: • Consider the possible form of association‚ corporate and non-corporate • Consider comparative advantages and disadvantages of each form of association in the light of facts given. • Remember that there can be many relevant factors‚ not all of them related to corporate law issues. Taxation stamp duty and human
Premium Law Corporation Statute
legal effect of common law and the Companies Act 1965 on pre-incorporation contracts. Pre-corporation contract is one which is entered into when the Company is in the process of being incorporated but is not yet completed it. At common law such contracts were held to be void‚ as the company is not yet in existence. - Newborne v Sensolid Ltd. In the common law effect‚ Pre-incorporation contracts cannot‚ in theory‚ be made by the company or by its promoter since the company or the principal does not
Premium Common law Contract Void
UNIVERSITY LGST201 COMPANY LAW Topic 1 - Introduction to the Company General Reading: Woon‚ chapters 1 and 2 (you may omit paras 1.73 – 1.1041). Note that Woon references below are to the Revised 3rd edition (2009) (corresponding references to the 3rd edition (2005) are footnoted). Legend - Very important. Must know! - Less important (but doesn’t mean can ignore!) 1. General Themes The company is essentially an artificial person created by law. What this “person”
Premium Corporation Types of business entity
mendelsohn@hud.ac.uk • • • • • Corporate personality Artificial‚ separate legal personality Registration at Companies House Limited liability Salomon • Issues arising from separate‚ artificial legal personality A. PROMOTERS • Background • Definition - no statutory definition - 2 common law definitions • Twycross v Grant (1877) 2 CPD – someone who “undertakes to form a company with reference to a given project‚ and to set it going and… takes the necessary steps to accomplish that purpose”
Premium Stock Company Fiduciary
modern information and technology-based nations and businesses vulnerable as information can be stolen from electronic storage media and transmitted in seconds without even physically removing the data. The paper attempts to examine how investors or companies could protect themselves from corporate espionage. However‚ in doing so‚ it shall also look at the historical development of espionage and examines how the advances in technology in the recent years have facilitated the act of espionage‚ and also
Premium Security Information security Competitive intelligence
Company Law 1) Explain the background to the case Salomon vs. Salomon. Mr. Salomon was a leather merchant in a large establishment. Solomon converted his business into a limited company as Solomon and Company limited with his wife and five children becoming members. Each member took one £1 share each. The company bought the business for £39‚000. Mr. Salomon subscribed for 20‚000 further shares. The company also gave Salomon £10‚000 in debentures (i.e. Salomon gave the company a £10‚000 loan
Premium Corporation Legal entities
of a company. And the common law has extended the scope of “promoter” further in Tracy v Mandalay Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 215. In this case‚ the High Court held that the promoters are not just these persons who take an active part in the formation process‚ but also these who profits from the operation of the company with a passive role. Applying this doctrine to the case study‚ Alicia can be regarded as one of the promoters of Batco Ltd‚ since she had involved in the formation of the company and
Premium Fiduciary Stock market Civil procedure
Page 1 of 43 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE COMPANIES ACT COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE‚ AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF UGANDA (A3-U) LIMITED Incorporated this……...day of June 2012 Page 2 of 43 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA THE COMPANIES ACT COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE‚ AND NOT HAVING A SHARE CAPITAL MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF UGANDA (A3-U) LIMITED Table of Contents MEMORANDUM
Premium Board of directors Chairman Member of Parliament