States should have mandatory military advice I disagree. First and foremost‚ if Americans were to be drawn to go into the military many inexperienced and untrained men and women would die in war because they would be too unequipped to handle the war. Many unimpeachable lives would be taken by forcing them to spend days and night in a war zone unprepared. A great variety of families would be traumatized not knowing if their family member would come back home. In addition‚ mandatory military would
Premium United States World War II Vietnam War
Should there be a mandatory military service? Should there be a Mandatory Military service in the US? David Labore Grantham University Should there be a Mandatory Military service in the US? The United States has the best military in the world. It has even been argued as the best ever in history. This has been accomplished with an all-volunteer military. The great armies of the past have been draft style‚ and mandatory style recruitment. The Roman’s started out
Premium Military United States Army
could either make it a success or a resounding failure and discriminatory policy. The mandatory community service for college is discriminatory towards minority and lower-income students‚ as well as their respected communities. The loose wording of key definitions along with systematic societal challenges makes for this policy as it stands a cog in the cycle of oppression and poverty. The proponents of mandatory community service for college students often claim that it is cut and dry on how the
Premium Community service Community University
Mandatory Military Essay While many people feel that mandatory military service protects the United States‚ ultimately in reality it sacrifices numerous of our fellow young citizens to death. Therefore‚ we should not have mandatory military service even as a proposition. Till this day there is a huge debate about whether or not people of a certain age should be forced to go to war. People question‚ should young men and women attend the military service? Is it really worth it? Supporters
Premium Military Conscription United States
Mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is right and reasonable in order to stop the habitual offenders of misusing this benefit. Are the hard working drug tested tax payers ready to support this law since it’s the hard earned tax dollars that fund these benefits? The argument stands to reason that we need to take control as employers to stop the misuse of benefits that pay for illegal drugs. Mandatory Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Did you know that as a tax payer‚ you are
Premium Drug addiction Drug test Employment
be able to weed eat all day‚ had to supply a drug test when there are people who are getting free money from the government and they do not. It is my opinion‚ that everyone who is receiving any kind of assistance from the government should have mandatory drug testing done. In 1935‚ President Roosevelt signed the signed
Premium Drug addiction Employment Drug
Mandatory Drug Testing For Public Assistance Mandatory drug testing should be required for people wanting public assistance. It is used in order to stop habitual offenders that misuse the benefits that the government provides to us‚ the tax payers. It is our hard earned tax dollars that fund these benefits. This argument is to reason that we need to take control as employers to stop the misuse of benefits that pay for illegal drugs. As a tax payer‚ you are considered an employer
Premium Drug addiction Drug test Welfare
serve two years of military service‚ and as America continues to have military struggle throughout the globe it has been proposed to follow the similar policy of mandatary service. However‚ joining the military should be each individual’s choice. Mandatory recruitment will only result in putting listless people in the army‚ education interference‚ and places lives at risk. Instead‚ young men and women should be required to contribute in public service that interests him/her and could benefit them in
Premium Military Conscription United States
discussion about the benefit and downfalls of a society deamed to mandatory national service. Should our Government require every citizen to provide some type of national service‚ at a minimum but not limited to a year? Or should every citizen continue to have the right to restrict themselves of any national services? Lets weigh both options and provide supporting details to each. Many of you readers probably agree with the idea of mandatory national service. One supporter of this movement writes in
Premium Leadership Psychology Communication
difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences‚ because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes‚ but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences‚ but they “are the
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice