Lee V Lee S Air Farming 1961 Ac 12 Essays and Term Papers

  • Business Law

    Business Law “The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 has to be watched very carefully. It has often been supposed to cast a veil on the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. But that is not true. The courts can, and often do, draw aside...

    Premium | 1957 Words | 6 Pages

  • Veil of Incorporation

    Property Transferability of Shares Financial Power Capacity to Sue and be sued 3 D IFFERENCE BETWEEN A C OMPANY AND ITS PERS ONNEL S HAREHOLDERS Shareholder is an owner of shares in a company. Due to the principle of separate legal personality, a shareholder does not own any assets...

    Premium | 2053 Words | 7 Pages

  • Busniess Law

    promoters and company, the promoters motive in setting up a company absolutely irrelevant in determine corporate liability, analyze the case of Salomon v. Salomon and if the members are liable the company’s liabilities. All of these, this essay will provide a simple theoretical explanation. The Lord MacNaughten...

    Premium | 1687 Words | 5 Pages

  • Corporation Law

    regulatory history, the first thing to note is the limitation of the federal government’s power to make law with respect to the incorporation of corporations: s 51(xx); Huddard Parker has been a key factor determining the trajectory of the history of corporate regulation in Australia. The corporate history...

    Premium | 2294 Words | 10 Pages

  • Incorporation of Company

    companies in Malaysian is contained in the Companies Act, 1965. This Act is based on the English Companies Act 1948 and the Australian Uniform companies Act 1961. It is due in these historical ties, that the English and Australian Law has some significance on Malaysian Company Law. This is why you will see English...

    Premium | 3552 Words | 11 Pages

  • Company Law

    into existence as a body corporate at the beginning of the day in which it is registered with the name specified in its certificate of registration: s 119. This means that after the application for registration has been lodged with ASIC and a certificate of registration has been issued, a new legal entity...

    Premium | 1093 Words | 5 Pages

  • law assignmnet

    can be employed as well. We can say the directors as employee of the corporation. They cannot be treated as agent or trustee of the company. SALOMON V SALOMON & CO [1897] In this case, Salomon was a shoe manufacturer. He incorporated a company named Salomon and Co. Ltd. He took over the entire business...

    Premium | 2631 Words | 9 Pages

  • Some of the Cases Regarding Australian Law

    Ballantyne v. Raphael – • A syndicate containing more that 20 people was formed to buy a large tract of land. It was intended to subdivide the land and sell the indiv. blocks at a large profit. • Held- it is not a p/s as the venture was an isolated act. Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 (separate...

    Premium | 2211 Words | 6 Pages

  • Case List

    COMPARISON OF BUSINESS ORGANISATIONS Cases concerning partnership: Polkinghorne v Holland (1934) 51 CLR 143 National Commercial Banking Corp of Australia Ltd. v Batty (1986) 160 CLR 251 United Dominions Corporation Ltd. v Brian Pty Ltd. (1985) 157 CLR 1 LECTURE AREA 2 - HISTORY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK...

    Premium | 1431 Words | 4 Pages

  • Theories of Corporate Personality

    Corporate Personality And Limited Liability Cases: * Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co. * Lee v. Lee’s Air Farming * Salomon v. Salomon & Co. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I Manas Agarwal of B.A.LL.B (Hons.) is really grateful to Ms. Fincy V, without whose help and corporation this project would not...

    Premium | 4403 Words | 14 Pages

  • Company Law

    TOPIC 2: CORPORATE PERSONALITY: SALOMON V SALOMON [1897] AC 22 "It seems to me however that when one considers the fact that these shareholders were nominees of Mr Salomon's, that he took the whole of the profits and that his intention was to take the profits without running the risk of debts...

    Premium | 1474 Words | 7 Pages

  • Salomon V a Salomon

    Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd (Salomon) has created an impressive case in English Law history. The decision of the House of Lords in Salomon has reaffirmed the separate legal personality of a company. A separate legal personality is also known as the corporate personality. It is one of the consequences...

    Premium | 2261 Words | 7 Pages

  • Patterson Operation

    treated as agent or trustee of the company. Related case references Following cases can be mentioned as reference cases regarding the issue discussed: v   Macaura was a landowner who sold timber from his estate to a company of which he was the sole owner. He insured the timber that lay on his land in his...

    Premium | 6732 Words | 17 Pages

  • company law

    the articles of association and shareholders’ agreements 95 Chapter 10 Class rights 109 Chapter 11 Majority rule 121 Chapter 12 Statutory minority protection 135 Chapter 13 Dealing with outsiders: ultra vires and other attribution issues 149 Chapter 14 The...

    Premium | 15006 Words | 62 Pages

  • Itpromtess

    company the association of persons becomes a body corporate by the name contained in the memorandum. 3)REVIEW 1-Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1961] AC 12 is a UK company law case, concerning the veil of incorporation and separate legal personality. The Privy Council reasserted...

    Premium | 2173 Words | 9 Pages

  • Company Law

    who issued their opinions when deciding cases. Principles announced in these cases became precedent for later judges deciding similar cases. 12 12 Doctrine of Stare Decisis   Based on the common law tradition, past court decisions become precedent for deciding future cases. Lower...

    Premium | 1954 Words | 24 Pages

  • legal position of directors

    Institutional Nominee        Lending Institutional Nominee        Holding company nominee        Collaborator Nominee        Government Nominee u/s. 48B        Debenture holder Nominee        Independent Director        Others The individual cannot be a director for more than 15 public limited...

    Premium | 1683 Words | 5 Pages

  • Case Laws for Commercial Laws

    LGEAL PERSONALITY Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as "the rule in Foss v Harbottle", and the several important exceptions...

    Premium | 5982 Words | 16 Pages

  • Guide Line

    will be in Block therefore Phillip Spence will teach Stream A and Stream B in Weeks 1-6 and Brian Burnett will teach Stream A and Stream B in weeks 7-12. The space available in the lecture theatres is limited so swapping between classes is not advised, unless formal approval has been obtained. LEGT5541:...

    Premium | 12813 Words | 43 Pages

  • Company Law

    may prefer to do so via the LawNet database (access through the SMU Library website). Note: lawyers often abbreviate “Companies Act” to “CA”. Thus, s 19 CA means section 19 of the Companies Act. (Note that the spelling is Companies Act, not Company’s Act or Company Act). Ultimately, of course,...

    Premium | 3543 Words | 16 Pages