SUMMARY Indian Contract Act 1872 is the main source of law regulating contracts in Indian law. It determines the circumstances in which promise made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding on them. All of us enter into a number of contracts everyday knowingly or unknowingly. Each contract creates some right and duties upon the contracting parties. Indian contract deals with the enforcement of these rights and duties upon the parties. The Indian Contract Act 1872 sections
Premium Contract Contract law
Privity of Contract LGST101 Business Law Professor George Shenoy Group Members: Ue Mu En‚ Esther Goh Yue Lin‚ Sylvia Fong Li Chu Sabina Sun Chao Ng Shi Ya 1 Content Page 1. Case Summary 2. Can Brad sue Jennifer? 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Validity of Contract Breach of Contract Brad cannot sue Jennifer Brad can sue Jennifer 3. Can Angelina sue Jennifer? 3.1 3.2 Angelina cannot sue Jennifer Angelina can sue Jennifer 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 Contract (Rights of
Premium Contract Common law Breach of contract
Thomas Hobbes: The Social Contract Theory Thomas Hobbes theory is that in the state of nature‚ the only thing that motivates an individual is self interest. The state of nature is essentially a state in which men and women are left to their own desires and can do whatever they want. There is no government to intervene or necessary laws and standards. In the state of nature‚ you will do whatever you have to do to fulfill your self interest. In the prisoner’s dilemma two people have been arrested
Premium Social contract Political philosophy State of nature
This is a case of a sales firm which operates for 203 days in a year. Each day the firm operates‚ it generates revenue (profit) of Rs. 10 Lac. At the beginning of the year‚ the employees’ union confronts the management of the sales firm over wages and the union presents its demand. The management either accepts this‚ or rejects it and returns the next day with a counteroffer for wage to be paid to the employees. The firm can open and start functioning only after an agreement on wage is reached between
Premium Contract Wage Supply and demand
Decrease in trades and other payables + provisions (inclu NCL) Cash flow statement reports amount as - 6129 This includes the $714 CSR adj that we made in calculating NPAT (which doesn’t appear in the actual reported NPAT) So this figure needs to exclude the $714 otherwise we will double counting it The amount of decrease should be -6129 + 714 = -$5415 The 714 represents a loss that would reduce decrease in the payable that is a negative cash flow and reason why we making adjustment if
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Cash flow Free cash flow
The respondent is unable to justify the violations of Section 8 and 10 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms (charter) with regards to section 24 (2) of the charter. Section 24 (2) states that where in proceedings under section (1)‚ a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that did not infringe or deny any rights of freedoms guaranteed by the charter‚ the evidence shall not be excluded if it is established that‚ having regard to all the circumstances‚ the admission of it
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Common law
traditionally a law driven enterprise‚ that of negotiation. It is argued that the stability of contract which results from an earlier application of equitable principals in the negotiating process is just as crucial to integrative bargaining as the desire to increase the pie. With this conclusion‚ it becomes apparent that solutions which encourage integrative bargaining will result in more stable contracts. The increased stability rationale holds true even where there is no increase in the fixed sum
Premium Contract Negotiation
essay I will be discussing Thomas Hobbes’ and John Locke’s interpretation of the social contract theory. I will then be evaluating Locke’s argument that his conclusions differ from Hobbes’ as he claims. My thesis is the following: John Locke’s argument that his conclusions are different from Thomas Hobbes’ conclusions is not valid. He makes no claim as to why people are motivated to enter into a social contract; he also does not establish where the understanding of personal property comes from.
Premium Social contract Political philosophy John Locke
> ESSENTIAL REQUISITES OF CONTRACTS GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 1318. There is no contract unless the following requisites concur: (1) Consent of the contracting parties; (2) Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract; (3) Cause of the obligation which is established. (1261) SECTION 1. – Consent Art. 1319. Consent is manifested by the meeting of the offer and the acceptance upon the thing and the cause which are to constitute the contract. The offer must be certain
Premium Contract
NOTE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT‚ 1986 A person may be consumer of goods‚ or services. When I purchase a fan‚ a gas stove or a refrigerator‚ I could be the consumer of goods. When I open a bank account‚ take an insurance policy‚ get my car repaired‚ I could be the consumer of services. The consumer protection Act‚ 1986 tries to help a consumer when for example‚ the goods purchased are defective or the services rendered to him are subject to so deficiency. Prior to the consumer Protection
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Consumer protection Plaintiff