"How succesful was alexander ii in overcoming opposition to the regime" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 12 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Castros Regime

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    yardstick of development of development from 60 per thousand live children in 1958 to 13.2 in 1980. On the eve of the revolution there had been one doctor for 5‚000 Cubans‚ whereas thirty years later there was one per 400. Average life expectancy had risen from 74 to 57 and only 2 percent of the population was illiterate compared to 24 percent in 1958. All children of primary school age now attended schools whereas only 56 percent had done so before the revolution. The bare figures conceal the extent of social

    Free Cuba Fidel Castro

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    american regime

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    AMERICAN REGIME One can say that the major contribution brought to the Philippine literature under the American Regime (1898-1941) is the production of the Philippine Literature in English‚ which is divided into three different time frames : The Period of Re-Orientation (1898-1910); Imitation (1910-1925); and Self-Discovery (1925). The Philippine Literature in English saw it’s dawn with the introduction of free public instruction and the use of English as a Lingua Franca in all levels of education

    Free Philippines Manila

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leader of a New Era: How Alexander the Great Conquered Persia/ Greece Today‚ there is a debate on how Alexander the Great was able to conquer most of his known world. Some people believe it was due to his leadership and ruling capabilities‚ while others think it was due to Alexander’s adept understanding of strategy and tactics. Even though some people believe that it was his leadership role that helped him manage uprisings‚ and also allowed him to expand his empire. It was‚ ultimately‚ his abilities

    Premium Alexander the Great Philip II of Macedon

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander III

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “In terms of both personality and policies‚ Alexander III did not posses the qualities necessary for a successful ruler of late 19th-century Russia” – to what extent to you agree with this judgement? Whilst the judgement could be considered well-founded‚ its validity is a matter of opinion‚ depending on how one defines the qualities of a ‘successful ruler’ of Russia in the late 1800s‚ which policies contribute to this success and what‚ overall‚ makes a Tsar a success or a failure (if the

    Free Russia Russian Empire Autocracy

    • 2638 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was‚ as the name entails‚ great in some ways. In other ways though‚ he was not so great. How great was Alexander? Alexander was great in many ways. He was an excellent strategist‚ and was able to conquer almost anything he set out for. He usually was merciful as well‚ and honored all cultures and religions. He tried to learn about hinduism from the Brahmin in India. When he conquered Persia‚ he still let some Persians rule‚ as long as they answered to him. In India‚ whenever

    Premium Alexander the Great Chandragupta Maurya Philip II of Macedon

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    several supervisors who direct the workers. The manager must be familiar with the work of all the groups he/she supervises‚ but does not need to be the best in any or all of the areas. It is more important for the manager to know how to manage the workers than to know how to do their work well. A manager may have the power to hire or fire employees or to promote them. In larger companies‚ a manager may only recommend such action to the next level of management. The manager has the authority to change

    Premium

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? In 1917 Tsar Nicholas II signed a deliration to abdicate from power; this was due to a number of long term and short term factors; some being of Nicolas II own problems and some being general problems that faced Nicholas II. When Tsar Nicholas II came to power many problems faced him‚ such as lack of industrial revolution‚ political problems‚ economical problems etc… Nicholas II was a very strong believer in autocracy and the belief that

    Premium Ethics Morality United States

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern History Assignment Focus Question: Why Did the Tsarist Regime Fall so quickly in 1917? Although the Romanov Regime had always been very unpopular with the Russian people over many years‚ the regime had always managed to survive until 1917. In order to discover why the regime fell so quickly‚ it is necessary to look at the number of different factors which led the Tsarist regime to fall in March 1917. Tsar Nicholas II ’s regime was autocratic‚ which means that the rule of the country is placed

    Free Russia Russian Empire Saint Petersburg

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Tsarist regime‚ though only started due to poor working conditions‚ the violent suppressing of the Russian people on ‘Bloody Sunday’ brought forth a wave of protest that argued for better leadership and civil rights for the people‚ and yet it wasn’t until 1906 that there became a decline in power in the Romanov rule‚ and so how did the Tsarist regime last until then‚ and what was the main reason? Immediately after the revolution there was a lack of official responses from Nicholas II‚ as he failed

    Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander the Great is renowned for uniting the known world under his leadership and has grown to mythical proportions in his leadership abilities and skill at arms. He was also a young ruler‚ brash‚ irreverent and narcissistic. His never ending lust to conquer new lands‚ his growing problems controlling his drinking and his relentless pushing of his army all contribute not only to illustrating personal character flaws but possibly to his death. In his young life Alexander was tutored by the

    Premium Alexander the Great Trojan War Iran

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
Page 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 50