"How could you apply kant's categorical imperative to make ethical business decisions" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    came up with an ethical theory called Kantianism. Kant believed that people’s actions should be guided by moral laws‚ and these moral laws considered as universal law. Also‚ these moral laws must be based on reason. Kantian conclude that the only thing that is called universally good is a good will without any qualification. It doesn’t matter whether the outcome is evil or right if we do an action because of our good will. He also argued that good things without any qualification could be harmful. According

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment 4 Facts Luke is an employee of ABC‚ and has appealed to me as an Ethics Department representative for advice in the following ethical dilemma. He has started to work on a project for developing an adult entertainment retail store situated in the neighborhood‚ where his brother‚ Owen‚ lives. All the information about the project is kept in strict confidentiality. However‚ Luke knows that in a month‚ when the information about the project will be made public‚ the prices for the property

    Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional‚ universally valid‚ and necessary‚ regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239). Kant writes about two formulations of his categorical imperative‚ the first being Universal law. The formulation of Universal Law is the basis of Categorical Imperative. It states that “Act only

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    main principles of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. (25) Kant believed that a moral action is made up of duty and good will. Without duty‚ an action cannot be morally good. This is how he developed the duty-based Categorical Imperative‚ also known as moral commands‚ as a foundation for all other rules and will be true in any circumstance purely based on reason. These tell everyone what to do and don’t depend on anything else‚ such as personal desires. Within the Categorical Imperative‚ Kant outlines

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What makes Immanuel Kant’s theory of moral so interesting is that it uses logical reasoning. He does not believe a set of rules that come from a divine being are correct or even come close to being right that reasoning can achieve. Why should something that claims to be all knowing create a sort of commandments if that being knows that not all humans will follow those codes of conduct? A part of Kant’s theory that intrigues me is his categorical imperative‚ and the two well know formulations of it

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality‚ the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy‚ illuminate Kant’s first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent‚ they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis‚ the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered‚ is a large distinction difficult to ignore‚

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. “The imperative thus says which action possible by me would be good‚ and represents the practical rule in relation to a will that does not at once do an action just because it is good‚ party because the subject does not always know that it is good‚ party because‚ even if he knew this‚ his maxims could still be opposed to the objective principles of practical reason” (4:414). Kant’s categorical imperative states that our actions should be in accord with universal good and not driven by any personal

    Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imperatives in general are commands that dictate a particular course of action‚ such as "you shall clean your room." Hypothetical Imperatives are commands that depend on my preference for a particular end‚ and are stated in conditional form. The Categorical Imperative‚ Kant argues‚ are moral actions based on a "supreme principle of morality" which is objective‚ rational‚ freely chosen‚ and it is not conditional upon one’s preferences. Therefore the Categorical Imperative can be the only

    Premium Metaphysics Immanuel Kant Germany

    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Explain Kant’s Categorical Imperative The Categorical Imperative was a deontological‚ absolute‚ normative and secular theory put forward by Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. Kant’s theory was deontological which means that it judges morality based on a person’s action rather than the outcome‚ it is also secular‚ this means that ‚ even though Kant is religious‚ his theory is not‚ his theory is judgemental which means the theory is normative and it is also absolute which means that Kant believes

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the formulations of Kant’s categorical imperative: “Act only in agreement with that saw through which you can at the same time with that it become a universal law.” Philosophers argues that senses of the supreme principle of morality is an average of wisdom that can be styled the “categorical imperative”. Perhaps the strongest argument that philosophers gives for that claim relies on the claim that morality requires justification by the principle which means that all immoral actions are irrational

    Premium

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
Previous
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50