Government in the Hunger Games Hunger games is a great example of a totalitarian government‚ where power is in the hands of one person or a very select few. However it could also be a form of dictatorship. Even though the leaders are termed President‚ Panem definitely not a democracy. What makes this topic trick is that the citizens of the Capitol have different rules than the rest of the districts and lead very different lives. Most readers would believe that it is a totalitarian communist government
Premium United States Government Democracy
Totalitarian Governments (Arendt Views) What is a totalitarian government? Totalitarianism is a political system where the state recognizes no limits to it’s authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private live wherever feasible. Totalitarian government is run by a sort of dictator that has immense power over the state and the people who are under him. “A totalitarian society is usually ruled by a dictator‚ and there is very little or no freedom. In totalitarianism‚ the government
Premium Government Totalitarianism Nineteen Eighty-Four
of government?” The answers have ranged from the rule of the one‚ to the rule of the few‚ to the rule of the many. This topic has long been the center of argument and has even started a few wars‚ such as the war of American Independence and the French Revolution. America and most of the Western world’s answer to these questions is democracy. That leads to another question‚ however‚ “Is democracy the best form of government?” In America‚ and most of the Western world today‚ the best government is
Premium Democracy United States Government
including individuals‚ society‚ business‚ governments‚ education‚ and many others. In the UK around 60% of adults actively use the Internet (Oxis)‚ (Laudon&Laudon‚ 2010). Electronic Government or in short e-government here refers to the conveyance of government information and services via the Internet or other digital means toward citizens or businesses or any other government agencies. The World Bank Group defined e-government as‚ “The use by government agencies of information technologies (such
Premium Public administration Government Public services
Authoritarian Government and Economic Development Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the correlation between economic development and authoritarian governments. The objectives of this study are to find out whether authoritarian governments an impediment to economic growth and how the authoritarian governments are performing economically compared to the developed democratic nations. The study was conducted using a quantitative approach. In the first part of the study questionnaires
Premium Democracy Autocracy Economics
Different people have different perspectives on government. There is always a purpose for creating a government‚ but different governments have different powers allotted to them. Throughout history‚ governments have changed and adapted to the people and environments. Many events of the past have made an impact on our current government. A government is created for many purposes‚ has powers allotted to a variety of people‚ and gives the country’s citizens and states certain rights. For generations
Premium Political philosophy Government Sovereign state
Should Governments Sponsor Gambling? The government is now sponsoring gambling to raise revenues. By 2002 government-sponsored gambling brought in 11 billion dollars! "Winning means a life of luxury and happiness‚" is only one of the many slogans the government uses to advertise gambling. Gambling has a lot of pros as to the economy and employing more citizens but it has a lot of cons as well. Should governments sponsor gambling? The answer is no! Governments should not sponsor gambling because
Premium Problem gambling Addiction Gambling
An oppressive government is more desirable than no government at all. Hello everyone‚ my name is Christopher Denq and I am the affirmative side of this debate. I would like to firstly provide two basic definitions relevant to this topic‚ followed by the value and criterion‚ then my four contentions‚ and finally‚ a conclusion. Firstly‚ my definitions: “Oppressive” is defined as unjustly inflicting hardship and constraint on a particular group. “More desirable” is defined as “more appropriate
Premium Political philosophy Government Democracy
Government is Different Paul Appleby • A good lawyer doesn’t mean that he will make a good judge • The more a person has succeeded in nongovernmental fields‚ the more they have developed interests and habits of thought that will unfit them for governmental roles • Government is a system‚ the system can’t be understood except in terms of the public employees themselves‚ their conceptions of their positions‚ and the attitudes of the public about what is required in and from our civil serveants
Free Aristotle Political philosophy Organization
Financial Tips Corliss Group Online Magazine: 10 Things Liberals Believe the Government Does Well Is there anything that big government does well? I mean sure‚ our military is really pretty practiced at breaking things and shooting people; which (I guess) explains why they are being sent to fight Ebola. (If that logic escapes you‚ don’t worry… I think a lot of us feel that way.) And yeah‚ the IRS is pretty good at separating me from my hard-earned money; but‚ then again‚ so is Banana Republic
Premium Liberalism Political philosophy Government