archive file of PSY 480 Week 1 Discussion Questions consists of: DQ 1: What are the four different approaches in clinical psychology? Which one do you believe is the most effective? Explain why. DQ 2: How is a clinical psychologist different from a psychiatrist? Under what circumstances would you likely encourage a close relative - child‚ spouse‚ parent‚ or friend - to see a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist? General Questions - General General Questions PSY 480 Week 1 Examination of Clinical
Premium Clinical psychology Psychology Mental health professional
Enron 1. How did the corporate culture of Enron contribute to its bankruptcy? There was an overwhelming aura of pride‚ carrying with it the deep-seated belief that Enron¡¦s people could handle increasing risk without danger. The culture also was about a focus on how much money could be made for executives. For‚ example Enron¡¦s compensation plans seemed less concerned with generating profits for shareholders than with enriching officer wealth. Enron¡¦s corporate
Premium Enron Andrew Fastow
Enron case 1. What activities and practices of Enron’s management team do you believe were unethical and/ or illegal? Concealing debt By using SPEs‚ Enron’s balance sheet understated its liabilities and overstated its equity and earnings. Enron disclosed to its shareholders that it had hedged downside risk in its illiquid investments using special purpose entities which were lies. Enormous spending Extravagant expenses were rampant in the company which included enormous salary expenses
Premium Enron scandal Enron Stock
Current issue: Scandals in auditing Enron Scandal 1. Introduction Accounting scandals are political or business scandals which arise with the disclosure of financial misdeeds by trusted executives of corporations or governments. These days‚ not too often‚ these scandals are splashed as headlines across media. Why? Because there are complex groups of stakeholders who might be seriously affected by the scandals. Enron scam was the most remarkable scandal in 20 centuries by their institutionalized
Premium Enron Arthur Andersen
Case Analysis for Starbucks-Early 2008 October 4‚2010 MKTG 480 By: Brandy Johnson Instructor: Dr. Jeff Totten Table of Contents I. S.W.O.T. 3 II. Situation Analysis 5 III. Problems Found in Situation Analysis 7 IV. Strategic Alternatives for Solving Problem 8 V. Selection of Strategic Alternative and Implementation 9 S.W.O.T. Strengths • Established reputation/High brand recognition • Strong financial background
Premium Management Marketing Starbucks
1. The Enron executive team including Kenneth Lay‚ Jeffrey Skilling‚ Andrew Fastow and other executives‚ were the key players in the crisis. The business practices they used when creating hundreds of SPE’s and diverting large amounts of liabilities to those off-balance sheet entities. Enron was aware of the minimal accounting guidelines for SPE’s and used them to their advantage. To create such a complex “paper” structure‚ the executives had to have coordinate their plans with the accountants
Premium Enron Audit Auditing
Enron‚ what caused the ethical collapse? Q1. What led to the eventual collapse of Enron under Lay and Skilling? A1. There are many reasons‚ which led to the collapse of Enron. With the senior leadership of the company not holding/staying true to the company’s code of ethics‚ not enforcing many laws (which led to the company violating those laws). Therefore‚ the inability of the senior leadership to ensure that there are not only written practices as to how business should be done‚ but actually
Premium Enron Ethics
Arthur Andersen LLP was found in Chicago‚ developed to become one of the “big five” largest accounting firm in the US. In 2003‚ after 90 years of business‚ the Chicago-based accounting firm was forced to close its doors because of accounting scandal I. The advent of consulting In the 1950s‚ Andersen began providing consulting services and over the next 30 years‚ Andersen’s consulting business became more profitable. With quick development of consulting sector‚ in 1999‚ Andersen separated
Premium Enron Audit Arthur Andersen
Case Analysis Arthur Andersen: Questionable Accounting Practices ●Introduction Arthur Andersen LLP‚ which is over a span of nearly 90 years‚ would become one of the "Big five" largest accounting firms in the United States. Moreover‚ the accounting firm seen as the symbol of trust‚ integrity and ethic. The good reputation is derived from the advent of consulting business‚ which was developed by Leonard Spack. However‚ with the growth of consulting services‚ many accounting firms viewed it as a
Premium Enron Business ethics Big Four auditors
1. The top management of Enron including Kenneth Lay‚ Jeffrey Skilling and Andrew Fastow. These managers created a tone at the top of Enron that allowed and encouraged accounting that mislead investors. The audit team at Anderson and especially David Duncan the lead partner for Enron’s audit holds responsibility. Anderson was negligent in finding problematic accounting used by Enron. In addition‚ Anderson made millions on consulting services provide to Enron which makes their independence
Premium Enron Audit Auditor's report