Ratio Analysis Ratio analysis is used to evaluate relationships among financial statement items. The ratios are used to identify trends over time for one company or to compare two or more companies at one point in time. Financial statement ratio analysis focuses on three key aspects of a business: liquidity‚ profitability‚ and solvency. Liquidity ratios Liquidity ratios measure the ability of a company to repay its short-term debts and meet unexpected cash needs. Current ratio. The current
Premium Financial ratios Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Bank Alfalah wants to become a premier banking institution and to satisfy its customers‚ it itself needs to become a profitable organization‚ that not only has growth in profits‚ increase its assets but also provide its shareholders with the maximum return so that they are also satisfied. * Operational Result Profit Comparison for 2010 & 2011 Description | 2010 | 2011 | | Rupees in’000 | Profit before provisions and taxes | 2‚965‚588 | 3‚263‚635 | Provisions | (402‚298) | (697‚960)
Premium Balance sheet Asset Stock market
OPERATING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE COMPANY PROFITABILITY RATIOS * Gross Profit marging Gross ProfitSales×100% 2010/2011 2009/2010 = (171‚325‚029/435‚759‚776) *100 = (59‚257‚454/327‚593‚843)*100 = 39.3164% = 18.0887% * Profit Margin = NPBT * 100 Sales 2011/2012 2010/2011 = (41‚896‚089/ 435‚759‚776)
Premium Balance sheet Investment Interest
expense a good indicator of the cost of using those buildings and equipment? Compare that situation to a company with new buildings and equipment where there will be large amounts of depreciation expense. The remainder of our explanation of financial ratios and financial statement analysis will use information from the following income statement: Example Corporation Income Statement For the year ended December 31‚ 2011 | | Sales (all on credit) | $500‚000 | Cost of Goods Sold | 380
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratios Balance sheet
Microeconomics of the Ford Motor Company Final Paper – ECO201 14EW1 Karen J. Cassady Southern New Hampshire University Abstract: (Brief Summary of paper aprox 150 words) to be added for final draft. Introduction The purpose of this paper will be to explain how the supply and demand as well as the elasticity of demand exists for the automobiles produced by the Ford Motor Company. The early history of the company through the present will be highlighted in an effort to show how
Premium Ford Motor Company Henry Ford
Case problem : Ford Motor Company’s Value Enhancement Plan Group 4 : Annie ‚ Duong Boi Ngoc ‚ Jussi ‚ Michael Q1. Does Ford have too much cash? Why did Ford choose to accumulate so much cash? And why is Ford distributing a large amount of cash now? (1) To check whether Ford has too much cash‚ we have to calculate the cash ratio. But the data we have is not complete‚ we cannot find out that ratio. Instead‚ we calculate the cash turnover ratio to check whether Ford has excess cash. Cash
Premium Stock market Stock
Current Ratio Interpretation From the calculation of the current ratio it is evident that the company’s current ratio for the year 2010 is 1.30:1 ‚2011 is 1.80:1‚ 2012 is 1.54:1 and 2013 is a 1‚53:1‚ that is company’s current assets in year 2013 was Rs. 1.53 for every 1Re of current liability‚ while in the year 2012 the current asset was Rs 1.54 Re of its current liability‚ while in the year 2011 the current assets was Rs 1.80 Re of its current liability‚ and while in the year 2010 the
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset Balance sheet
Fusion or no fusion of equity and the common law at a substantive level Since the administrative fusion of the Common Law and Equity Courts after the 1873 and 1875 Acts‚ there has been a lot of controversy over whether to fuse both equity and common law. There are valid arguments both for and against fusion. Those arguing for the fusion of Equity and Common Law at a substantive level often comment on the inconsistency created by equity’s intervention in law. ‘There would sometimes be arbitrary
Premium Law Common law Property
Microsoft Oracle Interpretation and Comparison between the two companies’ ratios (Reading the Appendix of Chapter 13 will help you prepare the commentary) According to this Oracle gives more per share to their stock holders then Microsoft does. Earnings per share As given in the income statement $2.73 Basic Common $1.69 Both companies have the ability to pay back their short term debts. Current ratio Current assets Current liabilities $74‚918 $28‚774 = 2.60 $73
Premium Financial ratios Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet
the difference between the taxes and the tax liabilities Long-term debt – debt that matures more than one year in the future c. Stockholders’ equity Preferred stock – form of ownership that has preference over common stock when the firm distributes income and assets Common stock – most basic form of corporate ownership Par value – arbitrary value assigned to common stock on a firm’s balance sheet Paid-in capital in excess of par – number of shares outstanding multiplies by the original selling
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Compound interest