Business Case (The Ford Pinto) There was strong competition for Ford in the American small-car market from Volkswagen and several Japanese companies in the 1960’s. To fight the competition‚ Ford rushed its newest car the Pinto into production in much less time than is usually required to develop a car. The regular time to produce an automobile is 43 months but Ford took 25 months only (Satchi‚ L.‚ 2005). Although Ford had access to a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto
Premium Ford Pinto
target groups should Ford focus with the selling of their new Ford Ka on the French small car market‚ to obtain a third of Renault’s market share within three years? 1.2 Market definition The market in which Ford Ka will operate‚ is the small car market in France. By small car market we mean category A & B‚ cars that are less than 390 cm long. Other cars are excluded‚ because the lack of information about this cars. 2. Internal analysis 2.1 Financial performance Ford word-wide: Ford’s overall
Premium Ford Motor Company Renault Ford Ka
Utilitarian Analysis The Case of the Ford Pinto The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months‚ which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time‚ but they were not required
Premium Ford Pinto Cost-benefit analysis Utilitarianism
SCMA Ford Motor Company Case Study Contents Executive Summary 2 Issue identification with Root Cause Analysis 3 Understanding Forecasts with the new Ford 2000 Projects 3 Ford’s current supplier base is excessive 4 Purchasing structure within the Ford organization 4 Environmental Factors 5 Alternatives 6 Keep its existing supply chain 6 Recommendation 6 Create a vertically integrated supply chain based on Dell’s model 6 Create a website for direct purchases 7 A pull system should be implemented
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain
THE FORD PINTO CASE: THE VALUATION OF LIFE AS IT APPLIES TO THE NEGLIGENCE-EFFICIENCY ARGUMENT Christopher Leggett Law & Valuation Professor Palmiter Spring‚ 1999 Abstract Text of Paper -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto’s due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues‚ most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company
FORD PINTO CASE The Ford management has chosen to be unethical and morally unworthy to be trusted with the lives of its customers. Can you just imagine the number of individuals riding every day in the cars that they produced‚ who are unaware that they could be in an injury any moment? Ford management has chosen not to follow the safety guidelines and standards in producing such products because at that time‚ the government is still not that strict in implementing such rules. And because of their
Premium Ford Pinto Cost-benefit analysis
Running head: FORD PINTO CASE (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1)Ford Pinto Case External social pressures play a big part in the decision reached about the Ford Motor Company. When you have highly respected individuals such as retired NASA engineer Dr. Leslie Ball say “The release to production of the Pinto was the most reprehensible decision in the history of American Engineering” (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1); there is cause for concern. There would be more
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Station wagon
The Ford Pinto was a subcompact vehicle that Ford Motor Company manufactured from 1970- 1980. The Pinto caught on with consumers‚ and sales of the vehicle were high. However‚ serious problems quickly arose regarding the design of the Pinto. The gas tank on the vehicles was placed directly behind the rear axle instead of above it‚ with only nine inches of space between the gas tank and axle. Bolts were also placed close to the gas tank‚ increasing the risk that they could puncture the tank in an accident
Premium Ford Pinto
the Recall Coordinator for Ford Motor Company. Field reports are coming in reporting the following: Rear-end collisions‚ Fires‚ and Fatalities. I must decide whether to recall the Pinto. (Case: Pinto Fires‚ Trevino & Nelson‚ p. 115) 3. Before the Pinto‚ Ford was immersed in an intense‚ internal struggle between “Bunky” Knudson and Lee Iacocca over the company’s product line. ● Major pressure to compete with German & Japanese compact cars. Iacocca and the compact car won the struggle. ● The
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Ford Mustang
Sha’Ron Williams March 25‚ 2013 Case 36: One Ford BUAD 455 Ford is an auto making known for providing outstanding products fluctuating from small cars to luxurious brands to its customers. Ford Motor Company is a United States of America auto making company .It was established by Henry Ford. It is based in Dearborn‚ Michigan‚ a small town outside of Detroit. Ford is one the world’s largest auto making company. In June 16‚ 1903 Ford was incorporated. It was also one of the few companies
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry General Motors