WITH LOW DOSE OF ARIPIPRAZOLE IN MENTAL RETARDATION- A FIRST CASE REPORT. ABSTRACT Aripiprazole is considered as a third generation antipsychotic and known for its unique partial agonist activity at dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1Areceptors. Partial antagonist action at serotonin 5-HT2Areceptors . The common neurological side effects are extra pyramidal symptoms‚ headache‚ insomnia and drowsiness. Seizures had been reported in 2 cases of adults with normal intelligence and 1 in healthy 3 year
Premium Major depressive disorder Bipolar disorder Schizophrenia
retains all ownership rights to the development of X. It also states that in R&D arrangements the entity (in this case Pharmagen) usually has an option to either purchase the partnership’s interest (PEI) or to obtain the exclusive rights to the entire results in return for a lump sum payment or royalty payments to the partnership (in this case PEI). This clearly fits into Pharmagen’s case since PEI is entitled to receive future royalties from Pharmagen in return for contributions (funds) for the development
Premium Pharmacology Pharmaceutical drug Pharmacy
1101IBA Tute Case Analysis – Preparation Sheet Week 6 Tutorial Case for critical thinking: Phone hacking‚ corruption and the closure of the News of the World 1. Which of the four views of ethical behaviour can best be applied to this case? Justify your answer. The moral-rights view of ethical behaviour would be best applied to this case as the decision for the company to illegally partake in phone hacking. By this decision‚ the company has intruded hundreds of individual’s personal privacy
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
Here‚ there was no harm. * RMJ case (804) – advertising their specialty is okay. terms you use matters. * Zauderer case (805) – can use pictures * Shapero case (805) – targeted mailings are okay * Peel (806) – okay to advertise a lawyer’s credentials‚ as long as truthful and helpful * Ibanez case (806) – CPA/CFP okay * Florida Bar case (806) ** EXCEPTION * Targeted mailings going to families of accident
Premium Law Lawyer Justice
COSTCO Case * In 1998‚ How were membership fees recorded in COSTCO’s financial statements? The membership fees recorded as revenue when received in Costco’s financial statement in 1998 according to the cash accounting. * Was this correct? If not‚ what accounting principle does it violate? No. It violates the revenue recognition principle because they did not provide services to members when they pay the membership fee during this fiscal year. It can only record this item as unearned
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue Sales
Reasonably foreseeable victims were brought to the forefront by cases such as Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California and subsequent duty to warn cases. Foreseeable means that a “reasonable anticipation of the possible results of an action” exists (Foreseeability. (n.d.)). The Tarasoff decision defined the first two categories of reasonably foreseeable victims‚ a person directly named by the client as being the target‚ and a person that a psychologist deems identifiable by using
Premium Family Parent Child abuse
Mr. Gioia’s decisions regarding the Pinto fires highlights the disengagement from emotion often associated with business decisions. From a business stand point‚ decisions have to be based on facts and financial repercussions are the ultimate deciding factor in which action to pursue. If a defect in a certain make or model of car is classified as an extremely rare incident then no action will be taken. This is governed by the premise of statistical probability. Coupled with a detailed cost versus
Premium Employment Management Ethics
subsidy scheme and the Plaintiff sued the Government for subsidies it claimed it was due. Rules There was no contract. The statement made by the Commonwealth was not offered as consideration for the plaintiff buying the wool. The Court stated that in cases such as this: ‘… it is necessary‚ … that it should be made to appear that the statement or announcement which is relied on as a promise [here the subsidy statement] was really offered as consideration for the doing of the act‚ and that the act [buying
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
The Obergefell decision is a landmark case that deals with a much greater debate than just that of the legality of same-sex marriage. The majority opinion of the court ruled in favor of the guaranteed right to marriage in every U.S. state regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. While the advancement of liberal social rights is evident in this opinion‚ the ruling‚ perhaps more importantly‚ confronts the struggle between the dissenting views of the nature of Constitutional revision. Through
Premium United States Constitution Liberalism Supreme Court of the United States
the Rights of People of Color’ Homework Nidhi Lala Indiana University‚ Bloomington Philosophy-P 145 Professor Sandra Shapshay 18th‚ September‚ 2014 Ta-Nehisi Coates makes an incredibly powerful statement about the rights of African Americans in ‘The Case for Reparations’. He traverses American History by exposing the various socioeconomic ways in which African American have been exploited. Coates’ shows through this essay that the exploitative acts of the past directly caused the disadvantages facing
Premium Black people Race African American